Perioperative anti-infective prophylaxis with teicoplanin compared to cephalosporins in orthopaedic and vascular surgery involving prosthetic material  K.Z. Vardakas, E.S. Soteriades, S.A. Chrysanthopoulou, P.J. Papagelopoulos, M.E. Falagas  Clinical Microbiology and Infection  Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 775-777 (October 2005) DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01177.x Copyright © 2005 European Society of Clinical Infectious Diseases Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 ORs and 95% CIs for infections at the site of surgery (the vertical line represents the ‘no difference’ point between the compared groups, and the horizontal lines the 95% CIs). The squares represent ORs from the different trials; the size of each square denotes the proportion of information abstracted from each trial. The diamond represents the pooled OR for all randomised controlled trials (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.45–3.84). Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2005 11, 775-777DOI: (10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01177.x) Copyright © 2005 European Society of Clinical Infectious Diseases Terms and Conditions