Self­Assessment Learner and Learning Create New

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
THREE HANDBOOKS TEACHER PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM EDUCATIONAL SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION.
Artifacts as Evidence in the KEEP Evaluation System
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
The Assessment Rubric in KEEP August 7, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw - KSDE Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
Informal Observations in KEEP by Evaluators and Observers October 16, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw, Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth Portfolio Your Name Here Date.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Teacher Evaluations in KEEP August 13, :30 am - 2:30 pm USD 447 Cherryvale High School Bill Bagshaw, KSDE.
Evaluations in KEEP and Accreditation Update August 12, 2013 Easton KSDE Scott Myers, Bill Bagshaw, Vicki Seeger, Kayeri Akweks.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
How to Conduct the KEEP System Evaluation and How the KEEP Repository Technology Works October 28, 2013 at Basehor-Linwood USD 458 Kayeri Akweks, KSDE.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Teacher Evaluations in KEEP August 30, am to 2 pm USD 429, Troy Public Schools, Troy High School cafeteria Bill Bagshaw, KSDE Peg Dunlap, KSDE Consultant.
May 29, 2013 Chanute USD 413 And Kansas State Department of Education.
KEEP for Teachers Pratt – SCKSEC Bill Bagshaw Assistant Director Teacher Licensure and Accreditation, KSDE.
Teacher Evaluations in KEEP August 20, 2013 USD Clyde HS Kayeri Akweks, KSDE; Peg Dunlap, KSDE Consultant.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Summary Rating Responses November 13, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw, Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
July 2001Mara Alagic: Differentiating Instruction 1 Differentiating Instruction: Individualized Learning Adapted from: Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Comprehensive Planning
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
School Self-Evaluation 
Goals in KEEP: District, Building, Professional, Ratings
INTASC Standards By: Jackie Celia.
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Colorado Department of Education
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presented by: Jenni DelVecchio, Renee Mathis, and Kevin Powell
Presentation transcript:

Self­Assessment Learner and Learning Create New User: kdempewolf­districtadmin District: D0450 Building: 0000 Access Level: 2 Current Evaluation: Roger Morgan ­ USD 450 ­ Home ­ Teacher Evaluations (https://appss.ksde.org/keep2/Evaluations.aspx) Self­Assessment Create New Years in profession: Years in this role in this district: Construct 1 Construct 2 Construct 3 Construct 4 Learner and Learning To ensure that each student learns new knowledge and skills, teachers must understand that learning and developmental patterns vary individually, that students bring unique individual differences to the learning process, and that students need supportive and safe learning environments to thrive. 1.1 Learner Development The teacher planned instruction based on the learning and developmental levels of all students. Goal N/A Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective The evidence indicates that the teacher did not or infrequently planned instruction that aligns with The evidence indicates that the teacher planned instruction that indicates that the teacher consistently and effectively planned https://appss.ksde.org/KEEP2/self_assessment.aspx

3/11/2016 Self­Assessment students’ developmental levels and learning needs. partially aligns with students’ developmental levels and learning needs. aligns with students’ developmental levels and learning needs. instruction that closely aligns with students’ learning needs and developmental levels. The evidence indicates that the teacher relied on a single teaching approach and resource. The evidence indicates that the teacher incorporated some teaching approaches and resources. indicates that the teacher regularly used a variety of teaching approaches and resources. indicates that the teacher consistently and effectively used a variety of appropriate teaching approaches and resources. that the teacher did not or infrequently provided adaptation of plans and instruction, and the adaptation that was provided was often not appropriate to the students’ learning needs. indicates that the teacher provided some adaptation of plans and instruction that met some of the student’s learning needs. indicates that the teacher adapted plans and instruction, when appropriate, to meet all students’ learning needs. indicates that the teacher consistently and effectively adapted plans and instruction, when appropriate, to meet all students’ learning needs. 1.2 Learner Differences The teacher recognized and fostered individual differences to establish a positive classroom culture. Goal N/A Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective The evidence indicates that the teacher did not or infrequently took steps to learn about students as individuals and as learners. indicates that the teacher took partial steps to learn about students as individuals and as learners. indicates that the teacher regularly took steps to learn about students as individuals and as learners. indicates that the teacher consistently and effectively took steps to learn about students as individuals and as learners. indicates that the teacher did not or infrequently incorporated knowledge of individual students to create a classroom culture of respect and rapport that meets the needs of all students. indicates that the teacher began to use knowledge of individual students to create a positive culture that meets the needs of all students. indicates that the teacher regularly incorporated knowledge of student diversity to create a positive culture of respect and rapport that meets the needs of most students indicates that the teacher consistently and effectively incorporated knowledge of student diversity to create a positive culture of respect and rapport that meets the needs of all students. https://appss.ksde.org/KEEP2/self_assessment.aspx

Construct 1 Comments Evaluator Comments 1.3 Learning Environment 3/11/2016 Self­Assessment 1.3 Learning Environment The teacher established a classroom environment conducive to learning. Goal N/A Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective The evidence indicates that the teacher did not or infrequently collaborated with students to promote student ownership of the learning. indicates that the teacher began to collaborate with students to promote student ownership of the learning. indicates that the teacher regularly collaborated with students to promote student ownership of the learning. indicates that the teacher consistently and effectively collaborated with students to promote student ownership of the learning. indicates that the teacher did not or infrequently established a safe, respectful, and academically engaging environment for students. indicates that the teacher began to establish a safe, respectful, and academically engaging environment for students. indicates that the teacher regularly established a safe, respectful, and academically engaging environment for students. indicates that the teacher consistently and effectively established a safe, respectful, and academically challenging environment for all students. Construct 1 Comments Based on your selections an approximate overall rating would be: N/A Unsubmit Printer Friendly Version Evaluator Comments https://appss.ksde.org/KEEP2/self_assessment.aspx

Artifacts Add New Artifact Artifact Type Date File/URL Components 3/11/2016 Self­Assessment Artifacts Artifact Type Date File/URL Components Lesson Plan Feb 23, 2016 lessonplanspage.com­War of 1812.pdf (3.1) Add New Artifact Select one or more Components Learner Development Learner Differences Learning Environment Content Knowledge Innovative Applications of Content Knowledge 3.1 Planning for Instruction https://appss.ksde.org/KEEP2/self_assessment.aspx

Save Reset Assessment Instructional Strategies 3/11/2016 Self­Assessment Assessment Instructional Strategies Reflection and Continuous Growth Collaboration and Leadership Upload file File types allowed: PDF, MS Word and MS Excel No file chosen URL URL for files hosted elsewhere Choose File Comments Save Reset ©2015 Kansas State Department of Education, All Rights Reserved Help Desk: Kelly Dempewolf ­ (785)296­5140 kdempewolf@ksde.org (mailto:kdempewolf@ksde.org) Bill Bagshaw ­ (785)296­2198 Bbagshaw@ksde.org (mailto:Bbagshaw@ksde.org) 120 SE 10th Avenue Topeka, KS 66612­1182 All sessions with this server are subject to the KSDE Use Policy and will be monitored and logged. Disconnect now if you do not consent to having your actions monitored and logged, or if you do not agree to comply with the KSDE Use Policy. Terms of Use (http://www.ksde.org/TermsofUse.aspx) | Privacy Policy (http://www.ksde.org/privacy.aspx) | EOE Statement (http://www.ksde.org/504GrievanceProcedure.aspx) https://appss.ksde.org/KEEP2/self_assessment.aspx