Structure of the Protein Phosphatase 2A Holoenzyme

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Advertisements

Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Structure and Mechanism of the Phosphotyrosyl Phosphatase Activator
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Caspase-3 by XIAP
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Structural View of the Ran–Importin β Interaction at 2.3 Å Resolution
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structural Basis of Caspase-7 Inhibition by XIAP
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structure of the BRCT Repeats of BRCA1 Bound to a BACH1 Phosphopeptide
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Structure of the Protein Phosphatase 2A Holoenzyme Yanhui Xu, Yongna Xing, Yu Chen, Yang Chao, Zheng Lin, Eugene Fan, Jong W. Yu, Stefan Strack, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi  Cell  Volume 127, Issue 6, Pages 1239-1251 (December 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Structure of the Heterotrimeric PP2A Holoenzyme Bound to Microcystin-LR (MCLR) (A) Overall structure of the PP2A holoenzyme bound to MCLR. The scaffolding (Aα), catalytic (Cα), and regulatory B′/PR61 (B′-γ1) subunits are shown in green, blue, and yellow, respectively. MCLR is shown in magenta. B′-γ1 interacts with both Aα and Cα through extensive interfaces. Cα interacts with Aα as described (Xing et al., 2006). Three views are shown here to reveal the essential features of the holoenzyme. Surprisingly, B′-γ1 adopts a structure that closely resembles that of the scaffolding subunit (discussed in detail later). (B) A surface representation of the PP2A holoenzyme. Aα and B′-γ1 are shown in surface representation. Cα is shown in backbone worm to highlight the observation that the carboxyl terminus of Cα binds to a surface groove at the interface between Aα and B′-γ1. Figures 1A, 2A, 4A, and 4E were prepared using GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991); all other structural figures were made using MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991). Cell 2006 127, 1239-1251DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of the Regulatory B′/PR61 Subunit (A) A surface representation of the structure of B′-γ1 showing electrostatic potential. Three perpendicular views are shown here. Note that the elongated B′-γ1 protein contains a highly acidic, concave surface patch (top panel). B′-γ1 uses its less-charged, convex surface to interact with Aα. (B) The regulatory B′/PR61 subunit is structurally similar to the scaffolding subunit of PP2A and other binding proteins. B′-γ1 (yellow) contains eight HEAT repeat-like structural motifs. These HEAT-like motifs can be superimposed well with the scaffolding subunit of PP2A (left panel) or karyopherin α (importin α, right panel). The peptide binding region of karyopherin α coincides with the acidic, concave surface of B′-γ1. (C) Structural overlay of all eight HEAT-like motifs in the regulatory B′/PR61 subunit. HEAT-like motif 7 is most similar to the HEAT repeat of the PP2A scaffolding subunit. The majority of the HEAT-like motifs have helices almost parallel with each other. Cell 2006 127, 1239-1251DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sequence Alignment of the Regulatory B′/PR61 Subunits across Species Secondary structural elements are indicated above the sequences. Each HEAT repeat is represented by a distinct color. Conserved residues are highlighted in yellow. Residues that interact with Aα and Cα are identified by green and blue circles, respectively, above the sequences. The sequences shown include all five isoforms of B′/PR61 from humans: alpha (GI:18490281), beta (GI:30795206), gamma1 (GI:1418819), delta (GI:31083279), and epsilon (GI:31083295). The other sequences are the following: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rts1p (GI:532526), Chizosaccharomyces pombe CpB′ (GI:19075706), Caenorhabditis elegans CeB′ (GI:17557914), Drosophila melanogaster DmB′ (GI:60677747), and Arabidopsis thaliana AtB′ (GI:2244898). Residues 626–651 were not shown in this alignment. Cell 2006 127, 1239-1251DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interactions among the Three Components of the PP2A Holoenzyme (A) A surface potential representation of the PP2A holoenzyme. The electrostatic surface potential is shown for Aα and B′-γ1. Note the acidic environment at the interface between Aα and B′-γ1. The carboxyl terminus of Cα extends out into a negatively charged surface groove at the interface between Aα and B′-γ1. Two areas are circled. Area 1 involves a protein interface between Cα and B′-γ1. Area 2 centers on the recognition of the carboxyl terminus of Cα by Aα and B′-γ1. (B) A stereo view of the atomic interactions between Cα and B′-γ1 in area 1. This interface involves the HEAT-like repeats 6–8 of B′-γ1 and the α5 helix region of Cα. Side chains are colored orange. This interface contains a number of hydrogen bonds, which are represented by red dashed lines. (C) A stereo view of the recognition of the carboxyl terminus of Cα by Aα and B′-γ1 in area 2. This interface involves the HEAT-like repeats 5 and 6 of B′-γ1 and HEAT repeats 1 and 2 of Aα. Most residues from the carboxyl terminus of Cα participate in specific interactions. There is a good mixture of hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions at this interface. (D) Additional interactions with Cα are provided by the extended loop within HEAT-like motif 2 of B′-γ1. (E) A surface representation of the PP2A holoenzyme to highlight the binding mode of the regulatory B′/PR61 subunit. Note that B′-γ1 uses its convex surface to interact with the conserved ridge of Aα. (F) A stereo view of the atomic interactions between Aα and B′-γ1. This interface is rich in van der Waals interactions and involves six HEAT repeats of Aα. Cell 2006 127, 1239-1251DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Remarkable Conformational Flexibility of the Scaffolding Subunit (A) Structural comparison of the PP2A core enzyme (Xing et al., 2006) with the PP2A holoenzyme. The PP2A core enzyme contains Cα (orange worm) and Aα (magenta). The core enzyme is aligned with the PP2A holoenzyme to show the extent of conformational rearrangements upon binding to B′-γ1. Compared to that in the core enzyme, the amino-terminal portion of Aα swings as much as 50–60 Å in formation of the holoenzyme. (B) The switch point of the conformational changes in the scaffolding subunit is in HEAT repeat 11. To locate the switch point, the scaffolding subunits from the core enzyme and the holoenzyme were aligned on the basis of their carboxy-terminal 5 HEAT repeats (left panel) and their amino-terminal 10 HEAT repeats. Comparison of these two alignments identified a single switch point in HEAT repeat 11. (C) A close-up view of the alignment around HEAT repeat 11. (D) A stereo view of the detailed hydrogen bond patterns in the first α helix of HEAT repeat 11. The switch in HEAT repeat 11 appears to originate from residues 401–406. The presence of Pro406 makes it an ideal candidate for allowing these conformational rearrangements to occur. Cell 2006 127, 1239-1251DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Role of Methylation in the Assembly of PP2A Holoenzyme Involving B′/PR61 Subunit (A) In vitro assembly of a heterotrimeric PP2A complex does not depend on methylation of the catalytic subunit. Compared to the fully methylated Cα (top panel), the unmethylated Cα (middle panel) and the carboxy-terminally truncated Cα (residues 1–294) (bottom panel) retained the ability to form a stable complex with Aα and B′-γ1. Shown here are representative gel-filtration runs, with the peak fractions visualized by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (B) Measurement of the binding affinity between B′-γ1 and the unmethylated PP2A core enzyme using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). (C) Structure of the heterotrimeric PP2A complex involving Aα (green), B′-γ3 (yellow), and the truncated Cα (blue, residues 1–294). The red oval circle denotes the absence of interactions involving the carboxyl terminus of Cα. (D) A structure-based model for the assembly and regulation of the PP2A holoenzyme. The first step in holoenzyme assembly is the association of the free scaffolding subunit with the catalytic subunit to form the PP2A core enzyme. This association results in significant conformational changes in HEAT repeats 13 and to a lesser extent HEAT repeat 12 (Xing et al., 2006). The PP2A core enzyme then associates with a regulatory B′/PR61 subunit to form a holoenzyme. This association results in more drastic conformational rearrangements in the scaffolding subunit. The regulatory B′/PR61 subunit recruits substrate proteins using its acidic, concave groove. The red star in the catalytic subunit denotes the active site. Cell 2006 127, 1239-1251DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.033) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions