Selectivity / Channel Rejection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.
Advertisements

10/10/ * Introduction * Network Evolution * Why Gi-Fi is used * Bluetooth & Wi-Fi * Architecture of Gi-Fi * Features / Advantages * Applications.
Determining and Characterizing the Number of Frequency Hopping Interferers using Time and Frequency Offset Estimation Alican Gök Prof. Danijela Cabric.
Anatomy of Radio LAN Onno W. Purbo
Design MAN WLAN Onno W. Purbo Understanding.. WLAN Bandwidth Channels Propagation Designing the MAN Inserting Point to Point (P2P) Links.
Dirk Grunwald Department of Computer Science University of Colorado at Boulder July 7, 2011.
Wireless Networks and Spread Spectrum Technologies.
FHSS vs. DSSS Presented by Ali Alhajhouj. Presentation Outline Introduce the issues involved in the system behaviors for FHSS and DSSS systems used in.
Wi-Fi Technology.
Wireless Communication: Overview of basic concepts Narayan Mandayam.
Introduction to RF and Microwave Systems
Bluetooth Radio Basics
List and Details of Sources of Interference Kawsu Sidibeh Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, UK ESA Wireless Study WP 2.1.
2.4-GHZ RF TRANSCEIVER FOR IEEE B WIRELESS LAN UF# UF#
Paper Presentation Wi-Fi (802.11b) and Bluetooth: Enabling Coexistence Jim Lansford, Ron Nevo, and Brett Monello CSC8900 Presented by: Tu Tran.
Comparative Use of Unlicensed Spectrum Training materials for wireless trainers.
Stacy Drake Bluetooth Vs. Wi-Fi. What is Bluetooth?
XP New Perspectives on The Internet, Sixth Edition— Comprehensive Tutorial 6 1 Real-Time Communication on the Internet Exploring Wireless Networks Tutorial.
Doc.: IEEE ad Submission May 2010 Chin-Sean Sum, NICTSlide 1 Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence Date: Authors:
W.lilakiatsakun.  Radio Wave Fundamental  Radio Wave Attributes  RF System Component  RF Signal Propagation  RF Mathematics.
System parameters and performance CDMA-2000, W-CDMA (UMTS), GSM 900, WLAN a, WLAN b, Bluetooth. By Øystein Taskjelle.
24-July-2007 Wireless Networks. Wireless Technologies Bluetooth, ZigBee & Wireless USB short range communication between devices typically controlled.
Sept. 27, 2006 Lab #3 Due Today Tie it all together: Bandwidth, bandlimiting, information capacity example EM Spectrum Noise.
Preliminary Coexistence Tests The same wireless signal was used as the victim: – Power Level = 0 dBm – BW = 20 MHz – Center Frequency = GHz.
WIRELESS Communication Automation Control. Wireless = Efficiency Performance: Performance: –Space Efficiency: Efficiency. = #receptors / box area –Unlimited.
BLUETOOTH TECHNOLOGY Coexistence Of Bluetooth And Wi-Fi
Doc.: IEEE < g Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Partially Overlapped Channels Not Considered Harmful Arunesh Mishra, Vivek Shrivastava, Suman Banerjee, William Arbaugh (ACM SIGMetrics 2006) Slides adapted.
January 2001 Richard Paine, Boeing Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /046 Submission Boeing Wireless Dilemma Coexistence IEEE Monterey, Ca 1/15-19/01.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Wednesday, December 3, 2003Slide 1.
TI Confidential – NDA Restrictions High output power under 915 MHz FCC regulations without FHSS Digital modulation.
ECE 250: Wireless Communications and Networking Lecture 1.
Objective of this Presentation To understand what is Wi-Fi and what is Bluetooth. Difference between Bluetooth and Wi-Fi.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt XPD measurement & Alignment.
Wifi interference Site survey and Interference avoidence for wifi performance By zyyad ali shah syed Unik
Electromagnetic Waves
Gi-Fi Technology.
Electromagnetic Waves
RF components Design for the Internet Over TV Band Adaptor
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Wireless Technologies
Heterogeneous WiFi a/b/g/n
Critics of IEEE P response to FCC NPRM
Presented by: Jeffrey D. Bombell, American Computer Technologies
Three types of wireless technology
Ultra-Wideband - John Burnette -.
Wireless Sensor Networks 5th Lecture
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
WI-FI AND WIMAX.
Bluetooth: Vision, Goals and Architecture
February 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY considerations for low power body.
IEEE Interference Environment
November 18 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Device Technology for WNAN Date Submitted:
Cognitive Radio Networks
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
CCI support of TDD stations
Amateur Extra Q & A Study Pool
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
Multimedia Training Kit
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY considerations for low power body area.
Wireless LAN Technologies and Products
March 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Harmonization of The 15.4g Mandatory Data.
CCI support of TDD stations
Wireless Range Testing
November 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [UWB Coexistence Issues] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence
Presentation transcript:

Selectivity / Channel Rejection Gives a measure of how good the receiver is at handling interference Desired signal / Interferer Power Alternate channel rejection/ Selectivity [dB] Adjacent channel rejection [dB] Selectivity/Channel Rejection Due to the world-wide availability of the 2.4GHz ISM band it is getting more crowded day by day (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ZigBee, cordless phones, microwave ovens, wireless game pads, toys, PC peripherals, wireless audio devices and many more). How robust a system’s link is will therefore be influenced by more than just the sensitivity and the output power. How the system handles interference is getting more and more important for all the frequency bands. Co-channel rejection is valid for a situation with an interferer at the same frequency as your wanted signal. The green spectrums is your wanted signal. For CC1020, the interferer may be up to 11 dB lower than desired signal without degrading performance. Adjacent Channel Rejection is a specification that tells us how well our receiver will be perform when there are other transmitters in channels next to your channel. Measure of how close the channels can be spaced. ACR = interferer level - desired signal level For CC2420, the signal in the next channel may be 39 dB higher than the desired channel without degrading performance, i.e a jammer in the next channel can be ~7900 times stronger without degradation of the wanted signal. Co-channel rejection [dB] Frequency Channel separation Channel separation

Blocking Gives a measure of how good the receiver is at handling interference from a source further away in frequency Frequency Frequency Offset Power Desired signal / Interferer Blocking Similar to channel rejection usuall mesurements with a larger frequency offset of +/- 5 MHz, +/- 10 MHz. Usulally when it is measured it is measured using a unmodulated signal as a interferer. How good the system is to "ignore" WLAN or any other transmitter is related to the selectivity of the receiver. We will see an example on next slide.

Receiver Example Desired signal / WLAN Chip A Chip B Frequency 5 MHz Power Desired signal / WLAN Chip A Chip B Sensitivity: -100 dbm -97 dBm Blocking: 27 dB +/- 5 MHz offset 55 dB +/- 5 MHz offset Case 1: The power from the WLAN is –80 dBm. Receiver A can receive a –100 dBm signal. Receiver B can receive a –97 dBm signal. Receiver Example 6 dB theoretically doubles the range. Case 1: The range of chip A is 1.4x the range of chip B. No degradation in receiver sensitivity.

Receiver Example 2 Desired signal / WLAN Chip A Chip B Frequency 5 MHz Power Desired signal / WLAN Chip A Chip B Sensitivity: -100 dbm -97 dBm Blocking: 27 dB +/- 5 MHz offset 55 dB +/- 5 MHz offset Case 2: The power from the WLAN is –40 dBm. Receiver A can receive a -40-27 = -67 dBm signal. Receiver B can receive a -40-55 = -95 dBm signal. Receiver Example Case 2: The range of chip B more than 16x the range of chip A. WLAN transmitter can be very close to the reciver. For example in a notebook. 6 dB theoretically doubles the range. Receiver B have 27 dB better receiver sensitivity.