Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Advertisements

Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
Reporting on Programme of Measures (Art. 13)
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
Current condition and Challenges for the Future Report s (Scotland and Solway Tweed)
Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.
WFD Reporting, Copenhagen, 4th Feb 2010 Schema overview WFD reporting training Copenhagen, 4 February 2010 Jorge Rodriguez-Romero DG Env, European Commission.
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Thematic assessments based on results from RBMPs Coastal and transitional ecological status & related presures Inland surface waters Hydromorphological.
EU Update/CIS England WFD Stakeholder Forum 4 April 2008.
Environmental Services Training Group
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Draft Mandate Johannes Grath Balázs Horvath (DG Env)
EEA 2017 State of European waters
Principles and Key Issues
Assessment of 1st FRMPs and 2nd RBMPs
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Philippe Quevauviller, Johannes Grath
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Daughter Directive Groundwater - Working Procedure -
The EU WATER POLICY.
Agenda item 6e) Update on progress elaboration of Article 4.7 Guidance
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
A. Pistocchi, A. Aloe, S. Bizzi, F. Bouraoui, P. Burek, A. de Roo, B
State of play of French progress in cost-effectiveness analysis
WFD and Hydromorphology - 4/5 June 2007, Berlin, Germany -
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Commission's activities
Update on RBMP&FRMP adoption and reporting Assessment of RBMP&FRMP
2018 Reporting under the Environmental Quality Standards Directive
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
Natural water Retention Measures
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Assessment of the Implementation of the Programmes of Measures
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
5b - Expert Group on Agriculture & Water/River Basin Network on agriculture Paving the way for WFD in cross compliance: discussion on practical implementation.
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
2012 reporting on PoMs Balázs Horváth DG ENV Water Unit.
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
EEAs assessments of the status of Europe’s waters
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy
EU Water Framework Directive
Commission's activities
EP Pilot project Comparative study of pressures and measures
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Update WG Eflows activity and link with EcoStat
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
Compliance checking of RBMP An inventory of questions
Directive on the assessment and management of flood risks - towards implementation SCG, By Maria Brättemark, European Commission, DG Environment,
CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Jacques Delsalle, DG Environment, Unit D.1
Water Director's Meeting December 2013, Vilnius DG Environment
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Item 7. Paving the way for WFD in Cross Compliance
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Water Director's Meeting May 2013, Dublin DG Environment
Water Director's Meeting December 2013, Vilnius DG Environment
Henriette Faergemann DG Environment, 04/09/2013
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016 CIS Working Group on Programme of Measures 25/26 March 2014 Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016 Steve Nixon WRc

Review of Reporting of Water Framework Directive Started in 2013: Lessons Learnt; needs of Commission; way forward endorsed by Water Directors Meeting on the review of current reporting guidance, 14 to 17 January 2014 Revised guidance to be discussed at WG DIS meeting, 1-2 April 2014 Resulting output forwarded to SCG (7-8 May) and Water Directors (5-6 June) for final endorsement Reporting 2nd RBMPs/PoMs in March 2016

Reporting of PoMs in 2010 “Elements” to be reported defined and described in schema Very complex and cumbersome structure Reporting of Article 11.3.a basic measures not useful Poor information on relationship between pressures, status and measures, and achievement of objectives Not a common understanding of what should be implemented and reported: e.g. Article 11.3 basic measures and Article 11.4 supplementary measures

Proposed new structure Measures to tackle significant pressures Measures to meet WFD objectives for Priority Substances List of Key Types of Measure and quantitative indicators of the expected implementation over the second planning period List of Measures Detailed information on specific measures and aspects Results of first programme of measures

What is meant by a “significant pressure” Those pressures which, either alone, or in combination with other pressures prevent or put at risk the achievement of WFD Article 4(1) environmental objectives including the achievement of good status, the non-deterioration of status, the avoidance of a significant and sustained upward trend in pollution of groundwater and the achievement of objectives in WFD protected areas. This means that for the second RBMP, all water bodies which are below good status and are not expected to achieve good status in 2015 are at risk and MS are expected to identify significant pressures for them.

Measures to tackle significant pressures (1) Subunit/RBD Water category Objective not being met failing to achieve good ecological status/potential by 2015; failing to achieve good chemical status by 2015; risk of deterioration to less than good status; failing to achieve good quantitative status by 2015; reversal of significant and sustained upward trend in the concentration of pollutants; achievement of objectives in WFD Protected Areas.

Measures to tackle significant pressures (2) Number/length/area of WBs not meeting objective Significant pressure type causing WBs not to meet objectives List of pressures_sources E.g. diffuse-agriculture; point-urban waste water; dams barriers and locks for hydropower Key Type of Measure planned to tackle pressure Value of quantitative indicator in 2015 and expected at end of planning cycle 2021 Other Measures planned to tackle pressure Value of MS quantitative indicator in 2015 and expected at end of planning cycle 2012

Measures to meet WFD objectives for Priority Substances Objective not being meet Achievement of good chemical status by 2015; Progressive reduction of pollution from priority substances (if this goes beyond achievement of good chemical status by 2015); Ceasing or phasing out emissions, discharges and losses of priority hazardous substances Priority Substances causing objective not to be met Number/length/area of affected water bodies Date for achievement of objective Measure(s) taken to achieve objective

List of Key Types of Measure and quantitative indicators 16 KTMs for the reporting of progress with PoMs in 2012 with quantitative indicators of progress Review of “Other” national KTMs reported in 2012 8 new KTMs proposed for 2016 Scope of some KTMs expanded Quantitative indicators proposed for each KTM

Change in scope of some existing KTMs (1) 2012: Construction or upgrades of wastewater treatment plants beyond the requirements of the Directive on Urban Waste Water Treatment (e.g. more advanced treatment than required in the UWWT Directive or constructions below the size threshold given in the UWWT Directive; please consider only WFD measures). 2016: Construction or upgrades of wastewater treatment plants including measures to reduce pollution from septic tanks and to upgrade treatment at small treatment works (<2,000 pe).

Change in scope of some existing KTMs (2) 2012: Reduce nutrient pollution in agriculture beyond the requirements of the Nitrates Directive (please consider only WFD measures). 2016: Reduce nutrient pollution from agriculture

Change in scope of some existing KTMs (3) 2012: Upgrades or improvements of industrial wastewater treatment plants (including farms) beyond the requirements of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive (please consider only WFD measures). 2016: Upgrades or improvements of industrial wastewater treatment plants (including farms)

New KTMs Reduce sediment delivery Measures to prevent or control the adverse impacts of invasive alien species and introduced diseases recreation including angling fishing and other exploitation/removal of animal and plants pollution from urban areas, transport and built infrastructure pollution from forestry Natural water retention measures Adaptation measures for climate change

Quantitative indicators of expected implementation Population equivalent covered by measure Area of agricultural land covered by measures Loads of pollutants Number of barriers to be tackled Length or area of bank/shore with rehabilitation and restoration measures Number of permits for abstractions and modifications of flow regime with ecological flow requirements Number of water bodies with eradication or control measures

Measures Associated with the Key Types of Measures Water Category Significant pressure Key Type of Measures Measure from list of measures

List of measures Measure code Measure name Measure type (Basic or supplementary) Basic Measure type (Article 11.3.a to l) Geographic coverage (MS, RBD, WB) Implementation Lead organisation Implementation Partners Finance secured? Funding sources (EU, national) Link to national information on measure

Detailed information on specific measures and aspects Based on targeted questions used in Commission’s 2012 assessment report Focus on methodological aspects and closed questions (yes/no/enumeration lists) Specific information provided in background documents that are accessible and allow digital processing of information Or could be in specific chapters or Annexes of RBMPs

Detailed information on specific measures and aspects Safeguard Zones Abstraction Thresholds Discharge Thresholds Physical Modification Permitting Adaptation to Climate Change Coordination with Flood Risk Management Plans Natural Water Retention Measures Drought Management Plans Water Efficiency measures Water Re-use

Progress with and achievements of the PoM for 1st planning cycle Closed question and links to specific documents on: Financial commitment for PoM New enabling legislation/regulation Degree of PoM implementation Improvement in status Measure effectiveness Obstacles Transfer of measures to 2nd plan

Thank you for your attention

COM in-depth assessment of the 2012 PoM reports Steve Nixon WRc CIS Working Group on Programme of Measures 25/26 March 2014 COM in-depth assessment of the 2012 PoM reports Steve Nixon WRc

CSWD accompanying Commission’s 2012 report to European Parliament and Council concluded on PoMs: Often a poor level of detail reported on the planned measures Difficult to assess the extent of the actions And how effective measures would be in achieving WFD objectives Measures often not clearly linked to the pressures they were to tackle and how far they were expected to contribute to the achievement of the stated objectives.

Preliminary Assessment of 2012 MS reports on progress with implementation of PoMs Undertaken during 2013 information on this presented at last WG PoM meeting, November 2013 Based on Member States reports on: First RBMP – March 2010 Progress with implementation of programmes of measures – December 2012 Deliverables: Preliminary Assessment Report Draft preliminary summary for each of 24 MS that had reported progress

In-depth assessment 2014 Aim is to establish the link between the proposed PoMs and the expected improvement in the status Overall assessment of how far the measures will be sufficient to address the pressures To inform the Commission’s Interim report to the European Parliament and to the Council describing Member States’ progress in the implementation of their Programmes of Measures published in their first River Basin Management Plans by December 2015 (Article 18.4).

Key Topics of the assessment Agriculture Chemicals Hydromorphological alterations Urban Waste Water Treatment Water Abstraction Horizontal economic aspects

Sources of information Information provided by Member States in bilateral discussions with Commission on issues arising from 2012 assessment Implementation reports on some Article 11.3.a Directives – UWWT and Nitrates Pressures and measures study reported in 2012: e.g. on water governance, enforcement and controls, and the legal status of RBMPs Background documents supporting 2009 RBMPs

Process and timelines Results of in-depth assessment added to MS summaries of the preliminary assessment Revised MS summaries consulted with Member States starting in June 2014 With questions to be addressed by MS and to request further information/clarifications One month consultation with MS The final MS assessments are to be completed by 1 October 2014 Draft overview assessment report on programmes of measures developed in parallel

Thank you for your attention

What is a measure? Measure - any action which will be taken on the ground to help achieve Water Framework Directive objectives. Mechanism - the policy, legislation, financial tools and other relevant means which are used to bring about those actions. Mechanisms include, for example: licensing systems; legislation; economic instruments; codes of good practice; negotiated agreements; promotion of water efficiency; educational projects; research, development and demonstration projects.