Gifted and Talented Academy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Advertisements

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Teamwork: Developing SMART Goals Together Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials September 12, 2013.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Gifted & Talented Program Evaluation CCSD Board Meeting Monday, May 19th, :00 PM.
Gifted and Talented Academy Session 4 April 5, 2011
Gifted Academy 4 Day 4 5/2/13. Agenda Welcome Goal Check-in Tuning Protocol Program Evaluation – Principal Interviews Developing a Communication Plan.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 2 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HEAEnet-public Password: education0309.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HAEAnet Password: education
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
©2012 Texas Education Agency and the University of Texas System GRANT WALK-THROUGH 1.
Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs Weekend 1 February 25-6, 2011
Best Practices in Gifted Education Site Visit Preparation Mary Schmidt Gifted Education Consultant or ext.
Gifted and Talented Academy Session 3 March 12, 2010
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
PASSING THE BATON SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION BETWEEN STUDENT ORGANIZATION LEADERS.
EDL 505 Week 5 Individual Plan for Professional Development Session To purchase this material click below link
The Planning Period and Beyond…
This training references results from the 2017 TELL Kentucky Survey available online at The intent is to begin discussion among staff.
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Developing Comprehensive Gifted Programming
Expeditionary Learning Professional Development
Expeditionary Learning Professional Development
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2
The Year of Core Instruction
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
TIME Hierck, T., & Weber, C. (2014). RTI roadmap for school leaders: plan and go. Englewood, CO: Lead Learn Press. LCHS Relearn/Reassess Policy My Student.
TIME Hierck, T., & Weber, C. (2014). RTI roadmap for school leaders: plan and go. Englewood, CO: Lead Learn Press. LCHS Relearn/Reassess Policy My Student.
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Youth Participatory Evaluation in a Public School District
Chapter 2: Mapping and Assessing Career Readiness Policies, Programs, and Industries May 2017 Copyright © 2017 American Institutes for Research. All rights.
Gifted & Talented Program
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Board Presentations Protocol:
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Professional Development Update
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Gifted & Talented Program
Aims of this session To get feedback from you on work that the planning group has done so far To what extent do you feel this structure supports your needs.
Work Time Work with your team to further develop and/or refine your written gifted and talented plan. Next session: May 17 You will be working independently.
Developing Comprehensive Gifted Programming
Systemic Student Support (S3) Academy
Sharing Leadership.
Assessment for Learning
Designing Comprehensive Gifted Programming
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Designing Comprehensive Gifted and Talented Programming
Work Time Work with your team to further develop and/or refine your written gifted and talented plan. A copy of your new/revised written gifted and talented.
Gifted and Talented Academy
TIME Hierck, T., & Weber, C. (2014). RTI roadmap for school leaders: plan and go. Englewood, CO: Lead Learn Press. LCHS Relearn/Reassess Policy My Student.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2
Best Practices in Gifted Education
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
Our Leadership Journey
Gifted and Talented Academy
Work Time Work with your team to further develop and/or refine your written gifted and talented plan. A copy of your new/revised written gifted and talented.
Gifted and Talented Academy
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Iowa Leadership Academy Superintendents’ Networks
Presentation transcript:

Gifted and Talented Academy Session 5 April 26, 2016 http://aea11gt.pbworks.com

Agenda Day 5 Welcome/Warm Up Lessons Learned Staffing Patterns/GT Schedules Job Descriptions Advocacy Work Time Closure

Wherever you go, go with all your heart. --Confucius

Welcome Back! Where we’ve been Vision/Mission/Beliefs/Commitments to Action Target population Identification Program goals Comprehensive programming Collaboration

Objectives To deepen understanding of the components of comprehensive gifted and talented programming To examine system-level factors affecting comprehensive programming Advocacy & Leadership To identify areas of professional growth necessary to effectively implement programming In-service Design

Warm Up Individually In your team/at your table Identify three ways you’ve grown in your thinking about g/t programming since September (1/sticky note) In your team/at your table Share ideas (3-5 minutes) Pair up w/someone not at your table Share 1 idea Repeat twice Return to table Share one thing you heard

Lessons Learned Form mixed-district groups of five Number off by 5’s Jigsaw “Lessons Learned” article Discuss connections to Academy learning Large group share

Barriers or Bridges Four lunch bags Bag 1 Nest w/bag 2 Build wall One side – barrier to accomplishing the recommendations from “Lessons Learned” Other side – bridge to accomplishing Nest w/bag 2 Build wall What two barriers can you identify with? What bridges do you need to build? Discuss with your team “What’s our plan?”

Staffing Patterns/Schedules What are the total FTEs for gifted and talented in your district? How are they distributed K-12? Who develops the schedule? What programming components have been identified? How is the teacher’s time allotted to implement those components effectively? What needs to change? Make connections to funding, inservice design, and advocacy. What works about your schedule? In a perfect world, what would your schedule look like? Where does practical reality meet Utopia?

Job Descriptions Do you have a job description? If so, in what ways does it accurately reflect what you do? What guidance should/would the written g/t plan provide and vice versa? What are the key elements of your job? What should you be doing that your currently aren’t? Rough out a job description that includes duties, dispositions, etc.

GT Teacher/Administrator Agreement What is the value in an agreement? How does it align with programming and with job description? What do school counselor agreements look like? Do you need an agreement with administrators? Time to discuss

Advocacy: What is it? Why is it necessary? On what levels does it occur? What resources are available? Where do we need to focus our advocacy efforts? Do we need a plan?

--NAGC, 2000 as cited in Purcell & Eckert, 2006 Advocacy: What is It? “…the act of arguing in favor of something – an idea, cause, or policy” --NAGC, 2000 as cited in Purcell & Eckert, 2006 …getting decision makers at the school, school district, state, and national levels to support strategies, services, and policies to initiate, implement, and support gifted education. --Purcell & Eckert, 2006

Why Advocate? Raise awareness Show positive impact Influence change --Purcell & Eckert, p. 240 Review Guiding Principles – p. 241

Levels of Advocacy National State District School

Levels of Advocacy Find a partner and discuss… …how you have been involved in gifted advocacy at any of these levels. …the extent to which advocacy is or should be part of your job. …the effectiveness of your individual and collective advocacy efforts. …ways to increase the effectiveness of your efforts.

Advocacy Resources http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=36 http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/advocacy.htm Purcell & Eckert, Chapter 18 (p. 239-248)

Advocacy Plan Traits Clarity – the plan has a clear message Inclusiveness – the plan involves interested parties Support Information – the plan includes support information Specificity – the plan provides specifics for implementation --Purcell & Eckert, p. 242

Advocacy Focus Barriers and Bridges Think back to the barriers and bridges you identified. Discuss the ways in which advocacy could make a difference. Do you need to develop an advocacy plan? (See p. 243, Purcell & Eckert)

Inservice Design What do the results of this SA/RT section reveal to you? What is revealed by your work so far in this Academy? What professional learning do you need and/or want, and how will that contribute to program growth and success? What professional learning do others in your district require to fully participate in comprehensive programming and services?

Learning Designs Think beyond “Death by PowerPoint” http://www.learningforward.org Hover over “standards” and click on Learning Designs.

Work Time Work with your team to further develop and/or refine your written gifted and talented plan. A copy of your new/revised written gifted and talented plan is due June 30.

Required Sections Vision/mission/beliefs/commitments to action Identification (include target population) Program Goals Differentiated Program Staff Qualification/Allocation In-service Design