Galactic Cosmic Ray Propagation in the 3D Heliosphere

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Advertisements

Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
Olga Khabarova & Vladimir obridko Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow,
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
A New Look at the Heliosphere and Solar Modulation
Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
Bastille Day 2000 Solar Energetic Particles Event: Ulysses observations at high heliographic latitudes M. Zhang Florida Institute of Technology.
IMPRS June Energetic particles in the solar system The heliosphere is flooded with those particles, from at least 6 different sources!
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.
Intermittency beyond the ecliptic plane Anna Wawrzaszek, Marius Echim, Wiesław M. Macek, Roberto Bruno Mamaia, 6-13 September 2015 (1) Space Research Centre.
Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona I acknowledge helpful discussions with J. Kόta and J. GIacalone. Presented at the TeV.
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
1 Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation Kiruna 2011 LEE Low Energy Electrons P.I.C. June 30, 2010 John Clem and Paul Evenson.
C. J.Joyce 1, J. B. Blake 2, A. W. Case 3, M. Golightly 1, J. C. Kasper 3, J. Mazur 2, N. A. Schwadron 1, E. Semones 4, S. Smith 1, H. E. Spence 1, L.
Ed Stone Symposium February 11, 2006 Voyager Observations of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Heliosheath F.B. M c Donald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C.
02-06 Dec 2013CHPC-Cape town1 A study of the global heliospheric modulation of galactic Carbon M. D. Ngobeni, M. S. Potgieter Centre for Space Research,
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
Composition and spectral properties of the 1 AU quiet- time suprathermal ion population during solar cycle23 M Al-Dayeh, M I Desai, J R Dwyer, H K Rassoul,
39 th COSPAR Scientific Assembly Mysore, INDIA July 14-22, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal.
Centenary Symposium 2012 University of Denver June 26-28, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal 4.
Primary Cosmic Ray Spectra in the Planet Atmospheres Marusja Buchvarova 1, Peter Velinov 2 (1) Space Research Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
The Geoeffectiveness of Solar Cycle 23 as inferred from a Physics-Based Storm Model LWS Grant NAG Principal Investigator: Vania K. Jordanova Institute.
Daniel Matthiä(1)‏, Bernd Heber(2), Matthias Meier(1),
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Cosmic Rays at 1 AU Over the Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle 23/24 Cosmic Ray Transport in the Helioshealth: The View from Voyager AGU Fall Meeting San Francisco,
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT SIMULATIONS: A PARAMETER STUDY FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF MULTI-SPACECRAFT SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS.
16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
What Goes into a Pulsar Timing Model? David Nice Physics Department, Princeton University Pulsar Timing Array: A Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Telescope.
Multi-spacecraft observations of solar energetic electron events during the rising phase of solar cycle 24 W. Droege 1, R. Gomez-Herrero 2, J. Kartavykh.
Charge Sign Dependence in Cosmic Ray Solar Modulation John Clem and Paul Evenson Bartol Research Institute, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
Solar Wind Helium Abundance and the Minimum Speed of the Solar Wind
A NEW LOOK AT THE HELIOSPHRE AND SOLAR MODULATION The V1/V2 Saga and the Deep Minimum of Solar Cycle 23/24 Voyager CRS Science Team: E.C. Stone (PI) 1,
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their Reacceleration at the Termination Shock F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber.
Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.
The heliospheric magnetic flux density through several solar cycles Géza Erdős (1) and André Balogh (2) (1) MTA Wigner FK RMI, Budapest, Hungary (2) Imperial.
1 Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particle Propagation for Space Weather Mike Marsh, S. Dalla, J. Kelly & T. Laitinen University of Central.
Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz Extraterrestrische Physik Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik Christian Albrechts-Universität.
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
Inferring the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Back to the Maunder Minimum
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
Southwest Research Institute
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
T. Laitinen, S. Dalla Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, UCLan, UK
EGU General Assembly 2016 Contact: Dr. Johannes Labrenz
SLIDE SHOW 6. SOLAR WIND (Mariner 2, 1962)
Energetic Particle Fluences from Solar Wind to Cosmic Ray Energies
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
M. D Ngobeni*,1, M. S. Potgieter1
Energetic Particles: From Sun to Heliosphere – and vice versa
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
. Multipoint, galactic cosmic ray observations associated with a series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the case study of June 2015 A. Papaioannou1,
Xi Luo1, Ming Zhang1, Hamid K. Rassoul1, and N.V. Pogorelov2
  V1 and V2 Measurements of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Outer Heliosphere and the Heliosheath during Solar Cycle #23   W.R. Webber (The.
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
LIP Lisbon We would sugest to include in the Statement of Work the following points: The development of an engineering tool to extrapolate measured solar.
Gradients of Galactic Cosmic Rays: Ulysses KET Results
International Workshop
Mariette Hitge, Adri Burger
Presentation transcript:

Galactic Cosmic Ray Propagation in the 3D Heliosphere Bernd Heber, Jan Gieseler, Phillip Dunzlaff, Oliver Sternal, Reinhold Müller-Mellin, Andreas Klassen, Raul Gomez-Herrero, and Horst Kunow — Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Leibnizstr.11, D-24118 Kiel Abstract The on-going Ulysses mission provides a unique opportunity to study the propagation and modulation of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) in detail in the three-dimensional heliosphere. GCR particles are scattered by irregularities in the interplanetary magnetic field and undergo convection and adiabatic deceleration in the expanding solar wind. The large-scale heliospheric magnetic field leads to drifts of GCRs in the interplanetary medium. Therefore the spatial distribution and the time history of electrons and protons are a suitable tool to investigate the importance of drifts and diffusion in heliospheric modulation. In 1995 Ulysses moved from 800S to 800N, showing a positive latitudinal gradient for galactic cosmic ray protons and no latitudinal gradient for electrons. In 2007 the spacecraft will again span the same latitudinal range. Becasue the heliospheric magnetic field reversed from an A>0- to an A<0-magnetic epoch in 2001, the drift motion of particles is reversed. Therefore we expect no latitudinal gradient for protons and a small positive latitudinal gradient for electrons. In this contribution we will present first Ulysses COSPIN/KET measurements from the current southern polar scan. Radial gradients With the known galactic cosmic ray intensities measured by Ulysses (I(U)) and at 1AU (I(A), the radial distance of Ulysses and ACE from the Sun (Δr), we can determine the radial gradient of the galactic cosmic rays (Gr) and the normalisation factor f between both channels, by fitting to the data. The best fit results in a radial gradient of Gr = 4.5 +- 0.6%/AU Introduction The modulation of galactic cosmic rays is caused by a number of physical processes, including spatial diffusion in the turbulent heliospheric magnetic field, convection and adiabatic deceleration in the expanding solar wind, gradient and curvature drift in the large scale magnetic fields. The strength and relative importance of these processes varies with the location in the heliosphere and with the 22-year solar cycle. Since its launch in October 1990 Ulysses reached high southern heliographics latitudes three times, around 1994 close to solar minimum around 2000 close to solar maximum, and again in 2007 during the declining phase of the solar cycle (see figure 1). Since Ulysses is not only moving in latitude but also in radial distance, the determination of the latitudinal gradients requires not only a correction for temporal variation but also for the radial intensity gradient. Figure 2: The radial gradient of the galactic cosmic ray intensity for alpha particles with energies from 116 to 125 MeV/n in the inner heliosphere. Also plotted is the line of best fit from which we get the radial gradient: Gr = 4.5 ± 0.6%/AU. The temporal variation of galactic cosmic rays at Earth is given by a combination of carbon energy channels, as summarized in fig. 1 and tab. 1 which will be compared to the 1.2 GV Helium channel from Ulysses. We now need to find the ACE measurement which is corresponding best to the quiet time Ulysses helium channel. The best agreement is given, if the ratio of the intensity ratios in 2004/2005 and 1998/1999 is close to one (see 5th column of tab. 1).. Latitudinal gradients With the known galactic cosmic ray intensities measured by Ulysses (I(U)) and at 1AU (I(A), the radial distance of Ulysses and ACE from the Sun (Δr), we can determine the radial gradient of the galactic cosmic rays (Gr) and the normalisation factor f between both channels, by fitting to the data. The best fit results in a radial gradient of Gr = 4.5 +- 0.6%/AU Figure 1. From top to bottom: Ulysses radial distance and heliographic latitude, the sunspot number, Ulysses daily averaged count rates of 125 to 250 MeV/nuc Helium and 27 day averaged intensities of 126 to 196 MeV/nuc Carbon. The red curve in panel four reflects quiet time helium intensities. Marked by shading are two time periods in 1998 and 2004 when Ulysses was at about 5 AU from the Sun. Table 1: Ulysses KET and ACE CRIS accumulated intensities and ratios for the time-intervals 1998-1999 and 2004-2005, as well as the ratio of the ratios of column 4 and 3.