Completion Object Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Completion Agenda At the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Define completion Describe the process of completion List and define the different.
Advertisements

Step 1: Digging a Cellar On land, a majority of wells begin with digging a cellar from three to fifteen feet in depth. The purpose of a cellar is to align.
SPE WITSML: Technology to Business (T2B) for the Oilfield J
Statewide Rule 10 : Downhole Commingling
How to Submit Oil Online Completions – (Form W-2)
1 TIW CORPORATION A PEARCE INDUSTRIES COMPANY P.O. Box Houston, Texas U. S. A.
Completion Object Overview June 2013 WITSML/PRODML Standards.
Evolution 1. WITSML Life Cycle Timeline Years Version 1.0 Version 1.1 Version 1.2 Version
Should Horizontal Wellbores be Logged? An analytical approach to hydraulic fracturing entry positioning and completion equipment selection.
Inflatable DST Equipment An Overview Presentation.
INFLATABLE DST EQUIPMENT
Global Real Time More Efficiency. More Possibilities and.
Getting the Most Out of Blue Mountain RAM
Overview 1. 2 WITSML Special Interest Group Members A set of Data Exchange and Web Services Standards First published in 2001 Version 1.4 due in Q3 50+
Baker Jardine Petroleum Engineering & Software Gas Lift Diagnostics A New Approach Daniel Lucas-Clements Baker Jardine.
Uses of WITSML David Johnson Drilling and Completions
Speaker Introduction John Shields Software Projects Manager, Baker Hughes, Aberdeen 30 years working for Baker Hughes 30 years working for Baker Hughes.
Schlumberger Update Nigel Deeks Real Time Technology Manager
<PRODML/> - Industry Standard
1 Agenda Introduction Energistics Standards Panorama / History / Participants Web Services Interoperability Standards v1.0 WITSML Version 1.x Services.
PRODML Review Energistics Western Europe London, 31 May 2011.
Completing & Producing A Well
Energistics Technical Architecture Work Group Orientation Meeting.
19.Oct.2006 Presentation to WITSML Seminar and Exhibition by Cheo Alvarez, OVS Product Manager, OVS © One Virtual Source TM and.
Technical Team WITSML SIG Paris 16 May Technical Team Representatives mainly from service companies Energistics (Gary) keep a global issue list.
WELL OPERATIONS (WEOPS) Major Contractors. 2 PURPOSE OF WEOPS WORKSHOP Facilitate one to one meetings between Local Contractors and KPO WEOPS Major Contractors.
PRODML Overview – Energistics Seminar
WITSML – Realizing the Value John Shields Baker Hughes.
Merrick Systems Inc. Drilling Products Rapid Component Identification System Covered by one or more of the following U.S. patent No’s: 5,142,128; 5,360,967;
© Copyright 2006 POSC1 Production Reporting Overview.
WITSML Use Cases Calgary Workshop April Use Cases / Practical Implementations of WITSML Where are we now ? Different drivers in different Operators.
1 Agenda Introduction Energistics Standards Panorama / History / Participants Web Services Interoperability Standards v1.0 WITSML Version 1.x Services.
Energistics Asia South Region Meeting: (Drilling) WITSML SIG Update New Delhi, IndiaAlan Doniger 14 January 2007Chief Technology Officer Le M▲ridien New.
Agenda Introduction Energistics Standards Panorama / History / Participants Web Services Interoperability Standards v1.0 WITSML Version 1.x Services /
DDR Drilling and Well model Status – core group meeting.
WITSML Public Seminar and Vendor Exhibition: Welcome Alan Doniger, Energistics CTO May 28, 2009.
Welcome to the WITSML Public Seminar and Vendor Exhibition Paris, France 16 May 2007 Sponsored by Total.
SC 19 Liaison report to SC 18 API Winter Conference 2013 Jimmy Hashem Jan 24, 2013.
WITSML™ Drilling Standards Pemex 21 August 2008 Ciudad de México Alan Doniger, Energistics.
The European Gateway to TANKSAT The Ultimate Service for LPG Tank Telemetry MCS Europe Group Solutions.
WITSML SIG Area of Interest –the definition, movement, and storage of drilling data, information, and knowledge, especially the “right time” seamless flow.
ARTIFICIAL LIFT METHODS
PRODML Roadmap Energistics 2 nd Annual Standards Summit 2 November 07 Laurence Ormerod, Weatherford.
Introduction to Well Completions
Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking)
Lecture 10 Production Engineering
OSLC PLM Reference model February Summary of the OSLC PLM Reference Model V0.2 February 22 nd 2011 Gray Bachelor Mike Loeffler OSLC PLM Workgroup.
Oil and Gas Production 1 PRO 250 PowerPoint presentation created by Dr. Shauna Kocman used in CMC PRO250 with her permission under Creative Commons License.
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi
Drilling & Measurements (D&M)
Input to project from IIP
ERP = Enterprise Resource Planning
Recent Advances in Oil and Gas Production Engineering
Software Testing With Testopia
Overview of Production Engineering K12PG42. Topic Covered  Well Completion and Its Types  Perforation Types ( including Gun Types)  Workover Job 
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Optimizing Efficiency + Funding
Well Identification Industry Meeting
Lec 3: Object-Oriented Data Modeling
General Fund Enterprise Business System (GFEBS) Navigation Overview
Enter Participant Organization here Enter System / Activity Name here
Your Facility Your Information
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
CHAIR - JIM BENNETT EXXONMOBIL
Engineering Geology I (GED355) S
HSF Contents and Future Links to the ADMM
Civil Contractors Federation ‘2014 Earth Awards’ Submission Template CATEGORIES 1 and 2 ONLY Company Name (NOTE: if an Alliance then the name of the.
WELL COMPLETION AND STIMULATION BY BHARAT KUMAR HARANI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DAWOOD UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KARACHI.
Presentation transcript:

Completion Object Overview June 2013 WITSML/PRODML Standards

Completion Object Project Started: May, 2011 with participation from both WITSML and PRODML Participating companies: Chevron (sponsoring operator), Weatherford, Peloton, (lead vendors), Schlumberger, Paradigm, ExxonMobil, BP, Total, Halliburton with Energistics Delivery for Special Interest Group and subsequent public review: January 2013. After review, final version release: June 2013

Business Case and Benefits

High Level Application of Completion Object Primary Initial Usage Drilling – Production hand-offs DB to DB sync & transfer Initial completion & subsequent workovers Initial Completion transfer from rig Well services through life of asset Engineering applications transfers Eg, Nodal analysis models Well surveillance

Primary Initial Use Case: Over the Well Lifecycle, Drilling & Production MUST Pass Data Back and Forth Drilling & Completions Domain Production Domain Primary Initial Usage New Completion Drilling system WITSML Completion DB Current Workover Planned Now Enabled Drilling Data Completion Data Data Updates Drilled Well As Completed Well Perm. Gauge DTS Tubing Perforations SSSV Packer E.g. Gas Lift Change Well Services

Business Drivers and Benefits Eliminate multiple data entry requirements thereby improving accuracy and saving time Improved safety. Knowledge of what is down hole will improve operations Improved data consistency, accuracy, quality Improved planning and scheduling (through faster access to better quality data and by eliminating manual re-entry of data) Reduce reliance on paper or spread sheet well files

Concepts for Completion Object

Three Use Cases dealt with in this release Snapshot of completion at a point in time “what is current status?” eg for completion diagram, engineering application eg Nodal Change Log of events which alter completion between one time and another Eg, from well services contractor Cumulative History – whole life of well capable of generating current snapshot or any previous one Eg, for sync or transfer between databases

Example Snapshot at One Instant Snapshot is akin to a completion diagram at one instant in time DTS SSSV Tubing Casing Perm. Gauge Packer Perforations

Example Change Log for Single Job Perm. Gauge DTS Tubing Perforations SSSV Packer Casing Well CM [Construction and Maintenance] Ledger entry Perforation Job Perforations Data concerning change, in Downhole Components

Example Well Cumulative History Day 1 Day 4 Events Well equipment Well CM Ledger gets added to cumulatively Downhole Components added, updated or removed by Events

Data Organization 4 top-level objects: Downhole Component - contains wellbore equipment Well Construction Management Ledger - contains details of Jobs & Events Well Completion –associates a wellhead stream with one or more wellbore completions (completed zones) in the well Wellbore Completion – represents a section of wellbore open to flow with reservoir.

Scope of Downhole Components Wellhead Accessory Wellhead: not described in full detail Cement: placement as well as properties (also other fills) Downhole String Set Casings: multiple strings supported, can include joint tally Accessories to strings: e.g. packers, gas lift valves Tubings: multiple strings supported, can include joint tally Borehole String Set Borehole: the open hole sizes as drilled Perforation Sets Formation Layers: with basic properties String Equipment Perforation Set: physical description of perforations etc. Equipment: the components used Assembly: groups of components

Scope of Well Construction Management Ledger Identity information such as the well name Event Information, eg depth & time ranges of operation Completion reference information including references to string, equipment. Operational/management information eg, business associate, w/order number, cost, rig ID, flags if operation was planned/unplanned etc. eventExtension - contains the job data (limited types), may have reference to details in a WITSML object Participant – enables link to be made to any WITSML object, eg a log. No semantic meaning conveyed.

Nesting of Jobs containing multiple Events An event in the ledger can have a parent event ID. Events can be organized into a hierarchy. Eg, “Job Producer” = top level event “Sub Job” Events with this “Job Producer” parent: “Job – Well Service Rig Crew” “Job – Site Work” “Job – Tubing Inspection” From Different Service providers Hence, each service provider can supply their report to operator using the data-object

Scope of Flow Paths, Reservoir to Wellhead Parent =well Parent =wellbore Parent = downholeComponent Well Completion: a commingled “flow” in the well, eg “X” A References Well Completion X Not Specified: flow through specific tubing strings etc Wellbore Completion: section of borehole open to flow , eg “A” Contains Contact Intervals These would be further Wellbore Completions & Contact Intervals, linked to the 2nd tubing string’s Well Completion Contact Interval: physical connection to reservoir, 4 types: perf, o/h, slot, g/p References Perf set, borehole, equipment as appropriate AND Geology feature String Equipment: has Ref’d Perforated Intervals: from this component (eg casing) Perforation Set: physical perforation details

Role of Well and Wellbore in Completion The whole completion spans multiple wellbores so Downhole Components has parent Well Well Completion (where Well “flows” are defined has parent Well String and Equipment have parent downhole component and are associated with a wellbore (the end (bottom) point will define which wellbore) Each wellCMLedger entry in wellCMLedgers can apply to a different well (in addition to wellbore) Borehole has parent downhole component and is associated with a wellbore Wellbore Completion and Contact Interval has parent wellbore

Future Plans (Possible) Surveillance, flow paths etc – where are instruments, flows reported & measured (PDGs, DTS, etc.) in complex completions especially Optimization – addition of inflow performance and description, fluid properties  Nodal Analysis Reservoir connection made explicit e.g. with link to RESQML layers Tree and surface equipment Further “xxxJob” objects, eg perfJob, gravelPackJob, which contain full details of operations (not just “end result” of the jobs)

Other (secondary) Use Cases in Production Domain Completion DB Surveillance/ Reporting Optimization Optimization using Nodal models Perm. Gauge DTS Flowing Intervals, sensor depths

Summary A Major new Capability for life of well completion data management Needs promotion and adoption now Potential to Expand Data Coverage and Usage Potential to support new “Well Services DOF” industry approach with standard services reporting method