Restoring the Promise of Public Postsecondary Education: The Access to Success Initiative (A2S) Jennifer Engle June 10, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

UMKC’s A2S Initiative An initiative of the University of Missouri System, the National Association of System Heads (NASH) and the Education Trust.
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Horizon 2023 National Enrollment Projections and the Role of California Dr. Lisa Castellino Institutional Research and Planning Data sourced from NCES.
Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Grant Program Corey Chatis Chatis Consulting, Inc.
Washington Tuition and Fee Report House Higher Education Committee January 21, 2004.
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
Selected Data for West Virginia Higher Education J. Michael Mullen WVFAA November 6, 2003.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Resource for Researchers Tate Gould, NCES.
College Ready, But Locked Out? Setting the Stage Travis Reindl New England Leadership Summit on College Readiness and Success Boston, MA November 30, 2007.
State Support for Higher Education Illinois Board of Higher Education January 26, 2010 Paul E. Lingenfelter, President State Higher Education Executive.
Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Grant Program Tate Gould, Program Officer US Department of Education.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
Julie Johnson Vice President of Strategy. 2 Alliance Member DC  Arkansas  Colorado  Connecticut  District of Columbia  Florida  Georgia  Hawaii.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
It’s been 18 years… 1996 Purchasing Power compared to cents to the dollar. What $1.00 could buy in 1996 now costs $1.48.
Selected Data for West Virginia Higher Education National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Presented on June 4, 2003 National Collaborative.
Southern Regional Education Board Cheryl Blanco, Vice President, Special Projects Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
US MAP TEST Practice
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
What is Adult Learning? Presented by: Pamela Tate President & CEO, CAEL July 19, 2009.
© 2011 THE EDUCATION TRUST Graduation Initiative Unity Day| April 25, 2011 | Sacramento, CA.
Student Contribution to the Cost of Higher Education in the United States Multinational Higher Education Forum March 17, 2006 Paul Lingenfelter, President,
Studying the Impact of Indicators of Children's Well-Being on
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1994 – 2014
The Gateway to the Game Changers
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The New American Dilemma
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
THE PATH FORWARD KCTCS Strategic Plan
Chart 6. 12: Impact of Community Hospitals on U. S
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
2025 Initiative: CSU and CI Metrics & Benchmarks
Caralee Adams Contributing Writer, Education Week.
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
Nettles: Equity & Excellence Project Meeting, May 2018
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Facilities Forum State-by-State Analysis of Demographics, Affordability, and Appropriations.
Performance-Based Funding
Adult Learning in Focus
University of Hawai‘i Community Colleges
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Wed. April 20, 2016 Board of Trustees Meeting
Oklahoma Higher Education Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Presidential Electoral College Map
KCTCS Strategic Plan Update: Retention and graduation rates
School Model — Senate Education Finance and Policy Committee
School Model — State of Minnesota
FIRST ® Advocacy Don Bossi February 2019
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
Student Demographics and Success Trends
Oklahoma Higher Education Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Achieving The Dream Oklahoma Higher Education
Oklahoma Higher Education Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Achieving The Dream Oklahoma Higher Education
Achieving The Dream Oklahoma Higher Education
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Oklahoma Higher Education Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Achieving The Dream Oklahoma Higher Education
Presentation transcript:

Restoring the Promise of Public Postsecondary Education: The Access to Success Initiative (A2S) Jennifer Engle June 10, 2009

THE EDUCATION TRUST WHO WE ARE WHAT WE DO The Education Trust works for the high academic achievement of all students at all levels, pre-kindergarten through college, and forever closing the achievement gaps that separate low-income students and students of color from other youth. Our basic tenet is this — All children will learn at high levels when they are taught to high levels. Advocacy to help schools, colleges, and communities mount campaigns to close gaps Research and policy analysis on patterns and practices that both cause and close gaps Technical assistance to schools, colleges, and community-based organizations to raise student achievement and close gaps

Higher Education at EdTrust NASH/P16 Summer Institute with Achieve, Inc. NASH/EdTrust Access To Success Initiative (A2S) College Results Online (CRO)

Access to Success (A2S) Initiative Goal: 23 State University Systems committed to cutting access and success gaps for low-income and underrepresented minority students in ½ by 2015 Access to Success (A2S) Initiative

The Access to Success Imperative Need to produce more college graduates to compete in the global economy Changing demographics demand focus on underrepresented populations in higher education Current trends moving in the wrong direction in terms of real progress on access and success The Access to Success Imperative

Access to Success (A2S) Systems California State University System Connecticut State University System State University System of Florida University of Hawaii System Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education University of Louisiana System Southern University A&M College System University of Missouri System University System of Maryland Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning Montana University System City University of New York State University of New York University of North Carolina System University System of Ohio PA State System of Higher Education University of Puerto Rico System Rhode Island Board of Governors for Higher Education South Dakota Board of Regents Tennessee Board of Regents Vermont State Colleges University of Wisconsin System

23 Systems 390 Campuses 3 Million Students Systems Campuses Students California State University System 23 347,284 Connecticut State University System 4 28,503 State University System of Florida 11 233,757 University of Hawaii System 10 43,439 Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education 24 181,245 University of Louisiana System 8 71,044 Southern University A&M College System 3 11,441 University of Missouri System 47,841 University System of Maryland 97,882 Minnesota State Colleges and Universities 37 172,469 Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning 55,344 Montana University System 36,947 City University of New York 17 196,418 State University of New York 64 371,410 University of North Carolina System 16 160,192 University System of Ohio 61 500,000 PA State System of Higher Education 14 112,500 University of Puerto Rico System 55,458 Rhode Island Board of Higher Education 35,830 Tennessee Board of Regents 19 146,530 Vermont State Colleges 5 11,945 University of Wisconsin System 26 175,000 23 Systems 390 Campuses 3 Million Students

A2S Activities Partnership with NASH Convene CEOs and liaisons to facilitate system change work Convene workgroups with system representatives on key topics to identify promising practices and expert resources Develop, collect, and publicly report data metrics on progress toward A2S goals annually A2S Activities

A2S Data Metrics ACCESS: How well does the system’s entering class reflect the socioeconomic and racial/ethnic diversity of its state’s high school graduate population? SUCCESS: Is there parity in outcomes between low- income and underrepresented minority students and their peers in the system? ACCESS/SUCCESS: How well do the system’s degree recipients reflect the diversity of its state’s high school graduate population?

A2S Metrics Count the Missing Students Include all students, not just first-time, full-time students Include part-time and transfer/transition students, many of whom are low-income and underrepresented minorities Report retention and success rates for low- income students and transfer/transition students

A2S Data Definitions Student unit vs. aggregate data Systems use unit record data to produce aggregate reports System level data vs. institution level data System data captures transitions/completions across all institutions AA /BA cohorts vs. 2/4 year institutions Systems report on cohorts of AA and BA seeking students across institution types Transfer vs. transition students Transition student: Students who move from an AA to a BA program within an institution/system

A2S Access Indicators Associate’s and Bachelor’s Cohorts Representation of Low-Income Students % of entering students with Pell Grants/ % of HS graduates who are low-income in state First-time Transfer/transition students Characteristics of Low-Income Students For first-time & transfer/transition students: % Part-Time % Female % URM Representation of URM Students % of entering students who are URM/ % of HS graduates who are URM in state First-time Transfer/transition students Characteristics of URM Students For first-time & transfer/transition students: % Part-Time % Female % Pell

Access Metrics Comparison Data Low-Income URM Bachelor’s Cohorts First-Time High school graduates ages 18-24 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were low-income (below 200% of the poverty level), 2005 High school graduates ages 18-24 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were URM, 2005 Transfer/ Transition High school graduates ages 18-34 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were low-income (below 200% of the poverty level), 2005 High school graduates ages 18-34 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were URM, 2005 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2003-2005 via IPUMS

Access Metrics Comparison Data Low-Income URM Associate's Cohorts First-Time High school graduates ages 18-34 without associate’s degrees in your state who were low-income (below 200% of the poverty level), 2005 High school graduates ages 18-34 without associate’s degrees in your state who were URM, 2005 Transfer/ Transition Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2003-2005 via IPUMS

A2S Success Indicators Bachelor’s Cohorts Degrees Conferred Retention and Persistence Yearly retention and persistence rates by Pell and URM status Graduation Rates and Ratios 4- and 6-year graduation rates for Pell recipients / 4- and 6-year graduation rates for non-recipients 4- and 6-year graduation rates for URMs/ 4- and 6-year graduation rates for non-URMs Degrees Conferred # of bachelor’s degrees conferred to Pell recipients Overall and STEM # of bachelor’s degrees conferred to URMs

A2S Success Indicators Associate’s Cohorts Retention and Persistence Yearly retention and persistence rates by Pell and URM status Success Rates 4-year success rates for Pell / 4-year success rates for non-Pell recipients 4-year success rates for URMs/ 4-year success rates for non-URMs Disaggregated success outcomes by Pell and URM Transfer/transition to 4-year, certificate, or associate’s degree Degrees Conferred # of associate’s degrees conferred to Pell recipients Overall and STEM # of associate’s degrees conferred to URMs

A2S Access/Success Indicators Associate’s Cohorts Bachelor’s Cohorts % of students who were successful within four years who were Pell recipients at entry / % of HS graduates who were low-income four years prior % of students who were successful within four years who were URM / % of high school graduates who were four year prior % of students who earned baccalaureates within six years who were Pell recipients at entry / % of HS graduates who were low-income six years prior. % of students who earned baccalaureate degrees within six years who were URM / % of high school graduates who were URM six years prior

Access/Success Metrics Comparison Data Low-Income URM Bachelor’s Cohorts First-Time High school graduates ages 18-24 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were low-income (below 200% of the poverty level), 2000 High school graduates ages 18-24 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were URM, 2000 Transfer/ Transition High school graduates ages 18-34 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were low-income (below 200% of the poverty level), 2003-2000 High school graduates ages 18-34 without bachelor’s degrees in your state who were URM, 2000 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 and American Community Survey 2001-2002 via IPUMS 18

Access/Success Metrics Comparison Data Low-Income URM Associate’sCohorts First-Time High school graduates ages 18-34 without associate’s degrees in your state who were low-income (below 200% of the poverty level), 2001 High school graduates ages 18-34 without associate’s degrees in your state who were URM, 2001 Transfer/ Transition Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 and American Community Survey 2001-2002 via IPUMS 19

A2S System Change Activities U.S. Education Delivery Institute with Michael Barber Cross-system workgroups on cost management, financial aid, transfer, developmental education, enrollment management Pilot projects with Delta Cost Project, NCAT, and Equity Scorecard A2S System Change Activities

Jennifer Engle Asst. Director of Higher Ed. 202.293.1217 x370 Contact Us Jennifer Engle Asst. Director of Higher Ed. 202.293.1217 x370 jengle@edtrust.org www.edtrust.org 1250 H Street N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005 202/293-1217

2009 EdTrust National Conference When the Going Gets Tough: Smart Choices and Bold Action to Raise Achievement and Close Gaps November 12-14, 2009, in Arlington, Va. Join us. Visit our website to submit a proposal to present For more information, visit www.edtrust.org 1250 H Street N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005 202.293.1217