Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Picosecond Multiphoton Scanning Near-Field Optical Microscopy
Advertisements

Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Growth and Morphology of Escherichia coli: Experiments and Stochastic Model  Pradeep Kumar, Albert Libchaber  Biophysical.
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages L67-L69 (April 2008)
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Laurdan Fluorescence Lifetime Discriminates Cholesterol Content from Changes in Fluidity in Living Cell Membranes  Ottavia Golfetto, Elizabeth Hinde,
K-Space Image Correlation Spectroscopy: A Method for Accurate Transport Measurements Independent of Fluorophore Photophysics  David L. Kolin, David Ronis,
3-D Particle Tracking in a Two-Photon Microscope: Application to the Study of Molecular Dynamics in Cells  Valeria Levi, QiaoQiao Ruan, Enrico Gratton 
Photobleaching-Corrected FRET Efficiency Imaging of Live Cells
György Vereb, Elizabeth Jares-Erijman, Paul R. Selvin, Thomas M. Jovin 
Measurement of Single Macromolecule Orientation by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Joseph N. Forkey, Margot E. Quinlan,
Different Metabolic Responses in α-, β-, and δ-Cells of the Islet of Langerhans Monitored by Redox Confocal Microscopy  Ivan Quesada, Mariana G. Todorova,
Complex Metabolic Oscillations in Plants Forced by Harmonic Irradiance
Molecular Dynamics in Living Cells Observed by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy with One- and Two-Photon Excitation  Petra Schwille, Ulrich Haupts,
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Orientational Changes of Crossbridges During Single Turnover of ATP
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Raibatak Das, Stephanie Hammond, David Holowka, Barbara Baird 
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Dynamic Processes Shape Spatiotemporal Properties of Retinal Waves
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 91, Issue 10, Pages (November 2006)
Jana Humpolíčková, Aleš Benda, Jörg Enderlein  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Protein Free Energy Landscapes Remodeled by Ligand Binding
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Cholesterol Depletion Mimics the Effect of Cytoskeletal Destabilization on Membrane Dynamics of the Serotonin1A Receptor: A zFCS Study  Sourav Ganguly,
CW and CCW Conformations of the E
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Gustav Persson, Per Thyberg, Jerker Widengren  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Ivan V. Polozov, Klaus Gawrisch  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Pattern Selection by Dynamical Biochemical Signals
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
FRET or No FRET: A Quantitative Comparison
Pulsed Interleaved Excitation
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Obstructed Diffusion in Phase-Separated Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined Atomic Force Microscopy and Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching Approach 
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 97, Issue 9, Pages (November 2009)
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Blockers of VacA Provide Insights into the Structure of the Pore
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Chien-Jung Lo, Mark C. Leake, Richard M. Berry  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Long-Range Nonanomalous Diffusion of Quantum Dot-Labeled Aquaporin-1 Water Channels in the Cell Plasma Membrane  Jonathan M. Crane, A.S. Verkman  Biophysical.
Quantification of Fluorophore Copy Number from Intrinsic Fluctuations during Fluorescence Photobleaching  Chitra R. Nayak, Andrew D. Rutenberg  Biophysical.
Monitoring Actin Cortex Thickness in Live Cells
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Eric D. Siggia, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Stefan Bekiranov 
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages (November 2011)
Laurdan Fluorescence Lifetime Discriminates Cholesterol Content from Changes in Fluidity in Living Cell Membranes  Ottavia Golfetto, Elizabeth Hinde,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 1631-1649 (September 2002) Dynamic Fluorescence Anisotropy Imaging Microscopy inthe Frequency Domain (rFLIM)  Andrew H.A. Clayton, Quentin S. Hanley, Donna J. Arndt-Jovin, Vinod Subramaniam, Thomas M. Jovin  Biophysical Journal  Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 1631-1649 (September 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5 Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic of rFLIM apparatus. The microchannel plate intensifier was modulated at the photocathode. The signal generators driving the image intensifier and the acousto-optical modulator (AOM) were phase locked to a 10-MHz frequency standard. The relative phase (δ phase) between the two was adjusted under computer control, cycling through a series of n phase steps of 360°/n. An image was recorded at each phase step. The zero-order light exiting the AOM was isolated from the higher orders by an iris and relayed to the microscope illumination system through a multimode optical fiber. The optical modulation frequency was double the AOM driving frequency. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Dependence of rFLIM measured parameters (ΔΦ, YAC, YDC) and their partial derivatives on ωτ and σ. See text for discussion. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Spatially-resolved FLIM and rFLIM of fluorescein solutions containing 10% and 61% glycerol. Solutions in adjacent cuvettes: 10% glycerol, left in images and red in histograms; 61% glycerol, right in images and blue in histograms. Top and bottom rows, histograms corresponding to the images in the two center rows. Symbols, all of the binned data points; solid lines, Gaussian fits. Both original measured signals (ΔΦ, YAC, YDC) and derived anisotropy parameters are shown. The objective was a Plan 2× air (NA 0.06). See text for nomenclature and discussion. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Multi-frequency rFLIM of fluorescein solutions containing 10% and 70% glycerol. Values denote the image (population) average of the respective images (adjacent cuvettes). Circles, 10% glycerol; squares; 70% glycerol. Open symbols, ΔΦ; closed symbols, YAC. The solid lines represent global fits to the combined ΔΦ and YAC data, according to an isotropic rotator (Eqs. 7 and 8, r∞=0). The objective was Plan 2× air (NA 0.06). See text for a discussion of the results. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 FLIM–rFLIM images and derived parameter histograms for EGFP in E. coli bacteria and free in solution. (a) wide-field intensity (I, left) and steady-state anisotropy (r¯, right) images of the same selected field. (b) 2D histograms: r¯ versus I, left; YAC versus I, right. (c) 2D (τphase versus τmod) histogram of bacterial subpopulation (masked by thresholding). (d) 2D (τphase versus I) histogram. (e) 2D (YAC versus ΔΦ) histogram of free extracellular EGFP (upper cloud) and masked bacteria (lower cloud). Circles, mean values; solid lines, range of values predicted for EGFP as an isotropic rotator undergoing emFRET as a function of concentration (see text for details). (f) 2D (ϕΔΦ versus ϕYAC) histogram of free extracellular EGFP (upper orange cloud) and masked bacteria (lower green cloud). Circles, mean values calculated from the mean values of (e). τ and ϕ values in ns; intensities in arbitrary units; ΔΦ in radians. The objective was a Nikon 20× (NA 0.5) Plan Air. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Confocal laser scanning microscope images of isolated E. coli bacteria expressing EGFP and demonstration of emFRET by anisotropy enhancement after photobleaching. (a) Intensity (left) and r¯ (right) of bacteria expressing different levels of EGFP. (b) Intensity (left) and r¯ (right) of bacteria after local photobleaching of the main cell body. For compactness of presentation, the intensity and anisotropy images were merged as mirror images. (c) 2D (r¯ versus I) histogram of the image depicted in (b). The objective was a Zeiss 63× (NA 1.2) C-Apochromat water immersion. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Concentration depolarization (emFRET) of EGFP solutions. Solutions were measured in microcuvettes (pathlength 0.25mm) at 20°C. Values of r¯ (circles) averaged over the emission range 520–560nm and intensities (squares) corrected for inner filter effects on excitation, see Experimental) plotted as a function of EGFP concentration. The r¯ values (for c<1 mM) were fit to Eq. 30 (——; see text in Results and Discussion) and the corrected I values were fit to a straight line. Data were taken in two separate experiments (denoted by the open and closed symbols; allowance was made for a systematic difference of 15% in the signal levels of the two data sets). Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure A1 Dependence of ΔΦ (——) and YAC (- - - -) on ϕ and ωτ. Isotropic rotator: optical modulation frequency=58 ·γ MHz, τ=4.2ns, ro=0.35, r∞=0. The numbers identifying the curves are=γ. The circles and squares correspond closely to the experimental system (fluorescein in 10% and 61% glycerol solutions) studied by rFLIM (Fig. 3, Table 2). Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure A2 Simulations illustrating the influence of Gaussian distributions of ΔΦ values on ϕΔΦ distributions for an isotropic rotator (optical modulation frequency=58MHz, τ=4.2ns, ro=0.35, r∞=0). (A) Histograms corresponding to a mean ΔΦ of 0.05 radians (corresponding to a ϕ of 0.14ns, left curves: squares) and 0.22 radians (corresponding to aϕ of 1.1ns, right curves: circles). The open symbols are for an SD of the ΔΦ distribution of 0.005 radians and the closed symbols for an SD of 0.05 radians. Each distribution was generated with 5000 points, of which 1238 were rejected (by virtue of yielding imaginary solutions of Eq. 14) from the 1.1-ns ϕ histogram corresponding to the 0.05 SD ΔΦ distribution. Symbols are shown for every tenth point. (B) Effect of increasing the CV (at constant mean) of the ΔΦ distribution centered at 0.05 radians (ϕ of 0.14ns) on the computed mean ϕΔΦ (open circles) and the CV (closed circles) of the ϕΔΦ histogram. 1000 points were used for each calculation. (C) As in B but for the ΔΦ distribution centered at 0.22 radians (ϕ of 1.1ns). Open squares, fraction of rejected (imaginary) points. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1631-1649DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73932-5) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions