G0 Accelerator Planning Meeting (11/1/05)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journées Instrumentation du GDR Nucléon 8-9 Avril 2008, CEA Saclay Polarized Positrons at the Jefferson Laboratory (i) Physics motivations (ii) Principe.
Advertisements

Source Outlook High polarization strained-layer photocathodes were activated in both electron guns during the summer shutdown, with usual QE (0.2% at 850.
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise measurement of the density -dependence.
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : density -dependence of the symmetry energy. Nuclear.
Final Design of a CW Radio-Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) for the Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)* Abstract: The Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)
R. Michaels PVDIS at Nov 2009 Beam Requirements for PVDIS Property ValueRun-Avg Hel. Correl. 1-Day Hel. Correl. Energy 6 and 4.8 GeVdE/E < 1 ppm < 5 ppm.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
/SC-PAC Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Joe Grames CEBAF Operations
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Strained Superlattice.
PESP-2002 Sept High Power Diode Laser System for SHR D.Cheever, M.Farkhondeh, B.Franklin, E.Tsentalovich, T.Zwart MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
G 0 Coordinator Update & “To-Do List” Joe Grames William & Mary, June 5-6, 2006  Hall C Beam Line Tasks  Accelerator Preparation Tasks  Beam Halo 
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
SLAC, September 25, 2009 Searching for a U -boson with a positron beam Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility  The light.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 2014 Hall A Update Thia Keppel 1.
Polarized Positrons at the Jefferson Laboratory Idaho State University, Idaho Accelerator Center, Jefferson Lab, LPC Clermont-Ferrand, LPSC Grenoble, Old.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
3 MeV test stand measurement plans A. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 10/01/2013BCC MeV test stand measurements1.
G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.
Beam Optics for Parity Experiments Mark Pitt Virginia Tech (DHB) Electron beam optics in the injector, accelerator, and transport lines to the experimental.
Injector Status & Commissioning QWeak Collaboration Meeting May 24, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, S. Covert, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Parity Experiments and JLab Injector Riad Suleiman February 5, 2016.
G0 Backward Angle Request: Q 2 = 0.23, 0.48 GeV 2 Main points G0 goal is to measure G E s, G M s and G A e over range of momentum transfers with best possible.
CEBAF Source and Injector Status PREx-II Collaboration Mtg Feb. 26, 2016 Matt Poelker and Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources.
G 0 Project Coordinator Report Joe Grames “Big Picture” Schedule Preparations Polarized Source Injector Accelerator Hall C Accelerator Plans for 687 MeV.
Operated by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Polarized Electron Beams.
Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) B-Team Meeting September 10, 2008.
Polarized Injector & Upgrade Schedule QWeak Collaboration Meeting November 06, 2009 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Polarized Injector Update
Spin Precession At CEBAF
Grigory Eremeev, Joe Grames, Reza Kazimi, Yves Roblin
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, U.S.A.
Tango status at Elettra
A Mini-Primer for Parity Quality Beam (as seen from the Accelerator)
The G0 experiment at JLAB
G0 Backward Angle Accelerator Preparations

Parity Violation Experiments at JLEIC
5 MeV Mott Measurement for CEBAF Operations group
Noise Analysis for PREx - Pb Radius Experiment
Accelerator Issues Raised in Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting, April B-Team Meeting April 29, 2009.
Operations Department
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
QWeak Collaboration Meeting
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
Qweak Coordination Meeting
Adiabatic Damping and Parity Quality of Low Energy
Hall C – this week Time Period Plans 10/24-10/27 Target cool down
Beam size diagnostics using diffraction radiation
Physics Interpretation of PREX
Helicity Magnets for PQB Feedback Helicity Magnets for PZT Booster
Schedule Rolf Ent HPS Meeting, May 22, 2018.
Why CeC is needed? High luminosity of US future electron-ion collider(EIC) is critical for success of its physics program 2018 NAS Assessment of U.S.-Based.
Polarized Source: Recent Activities
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
Injector Setup for G0 and HAPPEX & Lessons Learned
B-Team Meeting October 28, 2009
MEIC Polarized Electron Source
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
Injector Commissioning & Optimization
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
HALLA APEL REPORT Yves Roblin Hall A colllaboration Meeting
Hall A Beam Parameters Table
Presentation transcript:

G0 Accelerator Planning Meeting (11/1/05) Agenda: 1. Introduction & Proposed Beam Specifications (Grames/Pitt/Suleiman - 15 min) 2. Proposed Accelerator Configuration [non-parity quality concerns] (Freyberger- 10 min) 3. Polarized Source Setup [parity quality concerns] (Poelker/Suleiman - 10 min) 4. Injector Matching [parity quality concerns] (Chao - 10 min) 5. Engineering Issues (Merz/Lauze - 10 min) 6. Software Issues (Bickley/Roblin- 10 min)

What is new for backward angle? 499 MHz vs. 32 MHz 80 uA (100 uA) vs. 40 uA Lower energy 687 MeV & 360 MeV (vs. 3 GeV) Superlattice (85%) vs. Strained (75%) photocathodes Ti:Sap & Fiber laser options PQB specs reduced ~2x <-> Asymmetries larger ~10x PQB dominated by source setup and injector matching G0 spectrometer reversed

Scheduling (intended accelerator schedule, but not yet firm) Pre G0 Run Accelerator down January-February 5 G0 laser table setup G0 injector matching setup CASA G0 1-pass G0 setup Hall B, then Hall A (using Hall C laser) run period 2/6-3/13 Hall C nominally down until 3/14 Best estimate for early beam delivery for checkout 3/1 First Run Period (687 MeV, 1 pass, high Q2 measurement) G0 accelerator commissioning 3/15 & 3/16 G0 physics commissioning 3/17-4/2 (3 polarized expt’s) G0 physics production run 4/7-5/1 (2 & 3 polarized expt’s) Second Run Period (360 MeV, 1 pass, low Q2 measurement) ~2 weeks later, start w/ ~2 days accelerator commissioning Special accelerator setup, G0 run only 5/16-8/1 Third (and final) Run Period (687 MeV, 1 pass, high Q2 measurement) Begin ~9/22-12/22 (3 experiments)

Parity Quality Beam Specs Property Nominal Deviation (slow) Helicity “noise” (2) 1/30th Other “noise” e.g. 60 Hz Run Averaged (3) Forward Specified Forward Achieved Energy (1) 687, 360 MeV ±0.1% 0.003% (105um) 0.01% (350 um) <5x10-8 (180 nm) <75 eV 29 ± 4 eV Energy Spread <0.1% CW Intensity 80 mA (100 uA) ± 5% 0.2% 1.0% <2 ppm <1 ppm -0.14 ± 0.32 ppm Position at Target “0” ± 0.2 mm 20 mm 0.2 mm <40 nm <20 nm 4 ± 4 nm Angle at Target ± 0.05 mrad 2 mrad 0.02 mrad <4 nrad <2 nrad 1.5 ± 1 nrad Divergence at Target 100 mrad ± 50% Unrastered RMS Size at Target 200 mm ± 25% 4 mm ? Polarization >70% Halo at Target <10-6 outside 3 mm radius <0.2% of nominal Dispersion at 3C12 35 mm/% and <1 mm/% at target. Standard deviation of difference between adjacent samples (each 1/30th) E.G, number of pairs in run, N = 15 per sec * 3600 sec/hr * 700 hr = 37.8 Msamples, and 20 mm/Sqrt(N) ~ 3 nm

G0 Diagnostics Girder

G0 Halo Girder