The Assessment of Results & Competencies (ARC) for RCs and UNCTs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Guidance Note on Joint Programming
UNDGO – UNDP BCPR – OCHA JOINT INITIATIVE ON RECOVERY COORDINATION (JI) DGO TRANSITION WORKSHOP Cairo, 6 March 2008.
RDT Capacity Assessment Report. RDT Capacity Assessment Report (draft) Assessment recommended in the M&A System Implementation Plan (April 2009) Assessment.
OMT RETREAT (WORK PLANNING). The UNDG Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of Common Services were developed in 2000 by an inter-agency.
Regional Adviser on Human Rights and the Law, UNDP Regional Center WCA
URUGUAY’s efforts to address synergies among the Conventions Workshop on synergies and cooperation with other conventions 2-4 July 2003 Espoo, Finland.
Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.
How to use this Presentation
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
Working Group on Audit Chaired by Dagfinn Knutsen, Director, Internal Audit Division, OIOS, UN Secretariat Achievements for 2007.
High level expert meeting to develop the Near East Regional Action Plan to Implement the Global Strategy to improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics.
SEPTEMBER 2013 PREPARED FOR: UNDG TASK TEAM ON GENDER EQUALITY CHAIRED BY UN WOMEN PREPARED BY: UNDG SUB-GROUP ON “ACCOUNTING FOR RESOURCES FOR GENDER.
Visual 3.1 Unified Command Unit 3: Unified Command.
Overview of UNDAF process and new guidance package May 2010 u nite and deliver effective support for countries.
Session V: Programme Roles and Responsibilities
UNDAF Challenges and Regional Support 1. 2  Government/National Authorities  United Nations System (Resident Coordinators, UN Country Teams, Regional.
Overarching Roles of Critical Partners In A Project 9:30 – 10:00 Rob Curlee, FMO Joseph Dominque, OCISO Mike Perry, EA.
Overview of UNDAF process and new guidance package March 2010 u nite and deliver effective support for countries.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Unite and Deliver An update Francesco Galtieri UN Development Operations Coordination Office (DOCO), New York JPO Workshop, Maputo, May 2009.
TUESDAY, 4:00 – 4:20PM WEDNESDAY, 4:00 – 4:20PM Douglas Hill, NHIN Implementation Lead (Contractor), Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Vanessa.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Name Position Organisation Date. What is data integration? Dataset A Dataset B Integrated dataset Education data + EMPLOYMENT data = understanding education.
Economic and Social Council Operational Activities Segment 9-13 July, 2010, New York.
UN Reform and the CCA / UNDAF process UN Reform and the CCA / UNDAF process.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
Quality Management Systems FIETA Providers Herman Letoka ETQA MANAGER.
Joint UN Teams and Programmes on AIDS Lessons from a UNDP/UNAIDS e-Discussion.
Simplification and Harmonization - Update UNDAF results matrix: feed back from roll out countries Joint Programming.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Expanded “Delivering as one” funding window for achievement of MDGs Francesco Galtieri UN Development Operations Coordination Office (DOCO), New York JPO.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Uniting Nations by Learning Together UPR as a process of accountability: Opportunities for inclusiveness Regional Governance Week Social Accountability.
1 Introducing the ARC: The New Performance Appraisal Tool for RCs and UNCTs March 2016.
Update from Regional Working Group on Gender (RWGG) May 2016 Geneva, Switzerland RCM and RUNDG Meeting.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Implementation of RCA Projects
The New Performance Appraisal Tool for RCs and UNCTs
Well Trained International
System Office Performance Management
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
WORK PROGRAMME to support the implementation of the Recommendation
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
Public School Monitoring Roadmap
How can field leadership make a difference?
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
UNDG Coordination Toolkit
Gender Reference Group
Road map and outline of the revised evaluation policy of UNICEF
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Service Development at Aalto University Key Enabler for Aalto's Academic Mission Mari Svahn.
REGIONAL COORDINATION OFFICERS’ WORKSHOP 5 to 9 September, 2016
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
The United Nations’ Legal Identity Agenda: Fulfilling the promise to Leave No One Behind Presented by, Kristen Wenz, Focal Point for the UN Legal Identity.
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Strategy
Chapter 3: Project Integration Management
Roles and Responsibilities
Multi-Stakeholder Workshop on the United Nations Convention against Corruption and its Review Mechanism Addis Ababa, 8-11 April 2019 Mirella Dummar Frahi.
Mr. LONG Maoxiong CAEA, China 25 June. 2007
Shasta CCD Board Retreat CEO Search, Accreditation & Student Success
Project Name Here Kick-off Date
Presentation transcript:

The Assessment of Results & Competencies (ARC) for RCs and UNCTs July 2018

Executive Summary The ARC is an integrated model for the assessment of results and competencies of Resident Coordinator and UN Country Teams working together towards supporting the achievement of SDGs under the 2030 Agenda. The ARC methodology allows for Resident Coordinators and UNCT members to clearly indicate their contribution to common UNCT goals, and will allow for mutual accountability to be addressed through a feedback mechanism between them. Combining both results assessment and competency assessment in one platform, and underpinned by a conceptual framework that supports mutual accountability, the ARC process and platform provide the following: Competency assessment of RC, and team attributes assessment of UNCT Results performance assessment of RC and UNCT Peer feedback between RCs and UNCT Members, and between UNCT Members Developmental plan for both RC and UNCT

Regional UNSDG Performance Management Team UNSDG ARC OVERVIEW Regional UNSDG Chair Regional UNSDG Performance Management Team UN Resident Coordinator UNCT Country Team in the ARC UNCT Goals & Success Criteria and UNCT Development Plan UNCT ARC Member/UNDP UNCT ARC Member/UNHCR UNCT ARC Member/FAO UNCT ARC Member/UNESCO Peer feedback amongst the UNCT ARC Members, and the RC will be conducted at year end and provided to supervisors UNCT ARC Members provide their indicators & self-assessments towards common UNCT Goals & Success Criteria to their direct supervisors Regional UNSDG Chair will sign off on final rating & narrative performance assessment on behalf of Regional UNSDG PMT Regional UNSDG PMT will review and provide feedback to RC/UNCT UNSDG, DSS, OCHA, DPA/DPKO, OHCHR provide additional inputs RC provides his/her indicators towards common UNCT Goals and Success Criteria; can also provide Development Plan

COMPONENTS IN THE ARC The four main components of the Performance Appraisal process are: RC/HC/DO/DSRSG Appraisal The performance appraisal will be based on the RC/HC/DO/DSRSG’s self-assessment of results against the ARC methodology, as well as structured performance feedback from all UN System stakeholders. For those RCs who also perform integrated mission leadership functions (i.e. DSRSG/DSC), DPA or DPKO provide inputs to their performance appraisal. For those RCs who are also HC, the ERC provide inputs to their performance appraisal. For those RCs who are also DO, the UNDSS provides inputs. The inputs are incorporated into one reporting instrument which is then used by the Regional UNSDG Team to appraise the RC/HC/DO/DSRSG across all job functions and to provide concrete feedback on 2017 performance. UNCT Appraisal The UNCT will be appraised by using the ARC methodology. The ARC methodology allows for RCs and UNCT members to clearly indicate their contribution to combined UNCT goals. UNCT Member The UNCT Member will be appraised by using the ARC methodology. The ARC methodology allows for UNCT members to clearly indicate their contribution to combined UNCT goals and will allow for mutual accountability to be addressed through a peer feedback mechanism, which will support UNSDG agency performance appraisals of their representatives on their contribution to the UNCT. Peer Feedback A RC/UNCT peer feedback process will be used to collect narrative feedback from RC and UNCT members on the achievement of joint UNCT goals and demonstration of UNCT attributes, as well as feedback to the RC on the demonstration of results competencies. Additionally, the process requests feedback from the RC to individual UNCT members participating in the ARC.

PARTICIPATION IN THE ARC Participation in the ARC is mandatory for the RC. For UN Country Team members, all criteria must be met to be eligible. Criteria for participation of Resident Agencies Criteria 1: Must be a full-time UN Staff member Criteria 2: The agency of the staff member must be an agency of the UNSDG Criteria 3: Has been in their current role for a minimum of 6 months during the calendar year being appraised Criteria 4: Has full delegated authority from their agency on both the financial and programmatic decision making for their respective agency Criteria 5: Is a member of the Security Management Team and a decision maker on the security of their agency staff Criteria for participation of Non-Resident Agencies  Criteria 2: Staff member agency must be a member of the UNSDG Criteria 5: Staff member must be accredited or have formal representation to the country For futher details on eligibility criteria please review the FAQs 2018 ARC Participation and the ARC Guidance 2018.   By no means does the ARC replace the respective performance assessment processes of the individual UN entities that comprise the UNCT. UNCT Members, regardless of their participation in the ARC, need to comply with the performance appraisal obligations of their respective UN entities. UNCT Members participating in the ARC are to discuss with their managers their planned contribution to common UNCT goals and success criteria, and also to provide them their self-assessments at year end. The ARC platform will allow for a report to be generated that can be shared with their manager, showing the UNCT goals, success criteria, and their specific indicators and self-assessment.

ROLES IN THE ARC Regional Chair Regional Director Regional ARC Administrator Resident Coordinator UNCT Member UNCT ARC Administrator Additional Inputs – UNDG/DSS/OCHA/DPA/DPKO HQ Admin (UN-DOCO)

ADMINISTRATIVE LEVELS IN THE ARC Acts as a focal point for the RC and UNCT on ARC administrative matters Inputs into the ARC platform on behalf of the UNCT and supports RC and UNCT members with any trouble shooting and advice on the ARC UNCT ARC Administrator Support the Regional UNSDG Performance Management Team in the performance appraisal process for the respective region Ensures RC and UNCT as a team comply to the deadlines and inputs required for the ARC Regional ARC Administrator Provides policy guidance on the ARC and its implementation Provides administrative oversight and technical support of the ARC platform HQ ARC Administrator (UNDOCO)

OPERATIONAL LEVELS IN THE ARC The RC, as well as their other roles such as the DSRSG, the HC and the DO, are incorporated in one holistic performance review. UNCT Members include their contributions to the UNCT Goals, which is shared with their agencies supervisor as part of their agency appraisal process UNCT as a team defines the overall UNCT Goals & Success Criteria that the UNCT will focus on for the year Resident Coordinator & UNCT Member & UNCT as a team The Regional UNDG Performance Management Team consists of the Regional UNDG Chair and Regional Directors (from across the UNDG at the D2 level) who provide an overall performance assessment for the RC & UN Country Team. Regional UNSDG Performance Management Team Agencies participating through the UNSDG mechanism can provide overall feedback on the performance of the RC and provide their input for consideration by the Regional UNSDG Management Team For the multi-hatted role of the RC (DO/HC or DSRSG) appraisals and inputs are provided by UNDSS, OCHA, DPA, DPO and OHCHR Additional Inputs from across the UN

UNIQUENESS OF THE ARC   The ARC brings together the appraisals of the RC, as well as their other roles and responsibilities as the Deputy Special Representative of the Secretary General (DSRSG), the Humanitarian Coordinator (HC), and the Designated Official (DO) – in one holistic performance review. Eligibility for participation in the ARC is clearly established thereby clarifying who is accountable for the UN’s results in each country. The ARC provides the opportunity for UNCT members to clearly indicate their responsibilities against UNCT goal categories to their supervisors as well as the RC and UNCT. The ARC captures both results and competencies into a single platform, streamlining the process and the collection of inputs from all parties providing feedback to the RC. RCs and UN Country Team Members can indicate their individual leadership contributions to collective UNCT goals, and thus expressing their mutual accountability towards these common goals. The ARC creates a peer feedback mechanism between the RCs and UNCT Members, as well as UNCT Members to each other to allow for mutual accountability for agreed UNCT goals. The RCs provide formal input into the performance appraisal process of all UN representatives who are members of the UN Country Team participating in the ARC. The ARC provides flexibility in the formulation of UNCT goals and can be updated throughout the reporting cycle if the country context changes. The ARC also offers the flexibility of an informal mid-year review, as needed.

THANK YOU!