TGn Sync Calibration for Beamforming

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1635r0 Submission January 2005 John S. Sadowsky, IntelSlide 1 WWiSE Preambles and MIMO Beamforming? Notice: This document has been.
Advertisements

TGn Sync An IEEE n Protocol Standard Proposal Alliance PHY Overview
Doc.: IEEE /1635r1 Submission January 2005 John S. Sadowsky, IntelSlide 1 WWiSE Preambles and MIMO Beamforming? Notice: This document has been.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1449r0 Submission November 2004 John Ketchum et al, QualcommSlide 1 High-Throughput Enhancements for : PHY Supplement John Ketchum,
Doc.: IEEE /0935r1 Submission July 2011 Fei Tong, CSRSlide 1 An improved non-compressed beamforming feedback format for 11ac Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0496r1 November 2016
Beam Tracking for ay Date: Authors: January 2017
MU MIMO beamforming protocol proposal
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
FCC TVWS Terminology Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Beamforming for mmWave Distribution Networks
Implicit Sounding for HE WLAN
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
BRP Transmit Sector Sweep
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
Multi-band Discovery Assistance
Two-sided LMR Feedback between AP and STA
Secure Ranging Measurement
120MHz channelization solution
Multi-band Discovery Assistance
Discovery Assistance for ay
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
OCT based 6 GHz AP Operation Discussion
Regarding UL MU protection
Multi-band Discovery Assistance for ay (CR on CID 1771)
A Comment on Black-Box adaptation for simulation methodology
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
First Path FTM SFD Text Date: Authors: December 2017
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
High-Throughput Enhancements for : PHY Supplement
Responses to “No” Vote Comments on Calibration
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
Multi-band Discovery Assistance for ay (CR on CID 1771)
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Discovery Assistance for ay
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Optimized MIMO Aryan Saed, Jung Yee, Jim Wight
Nulling and coordinated beamforming
Explanations for CR on NDP feedback report
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
Nulling and coordinated beamforming
Wireless Location Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
An improved non-compressed beamforming feedback format for 11ac
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack
AoD in Passive Ranging Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
AoD in Passive Ranging Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Comparison of Coordinated BF and Nulling with JT
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
First Path FTM SFD Text Date: Authors: December 2017
Virtual BSS For Multi AP Coordination
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Implicit Channel Sounding in IEEE (Feasibility Study)
Sounding for AP Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

TGn Sync Calibration for Beamforming Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 November 2004 TGn Sync Calibration for Beamforming John S. Sadowsky Intel Corporation 5000 W. Chandler Blvd. Chandler, AZ USA 85226 e-Mail: john.sadowsky@intel.com John S. Sadowsky, Intel John Doe, His Company

November 2004 Overview The TGn Sync proposal includes optional BF (beamforming) transmission modes. This requires a calibration to equalize response differences between the Tx and Rx RF and analog chains of a given STA. This contribution does not provide an exhaustive treatment of calibration. Rather, we provide mathematical details for one important case; the case of an AP transmitting BF on the downlink to a low cost client. Our design criterion, for this example case, is to minimize complexity in the client. A future revision of the TGn Sync proposal will include the details of this calibration procedure, as well as other protocols to support bi-directional BF. John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Terminology Correction Calibration Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 November 2004 Terminology Correction The correction is a complex coefficient applied to the transmit streams on a per antenna – per subcarrier basis. The purpose of the correction is to equalize response difference between transmit and receive processing paths (up to an unknown constant across antennas). Calibration The process of calculating correction coefficients. John S. Sadowsky, Intel John Doe, His Company

November 2004 Tx Corrections The correction matrix is a diagonal matrix of per antenna correction coefficients that is applied after beam-forming trans-formations and before IFFT processing. There is a different correction matrix for each subcarrier. We have suppressed subcarrier dependence in the notation. John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Frequency Domain Model November 2004 Frequency Domain Model Tx chain response matrix for device i: Rx chain response matrix for device i: Physical antenna-to-antenna channel for transmission from device i to device j: John S. Sadowsky, Intel

November 2004 Tx Calibration The purpose of calibration is to select the correction coefficients so that for each device we have Since these are diagonal matrices, we can also express this element-wise as The constant is constant across antennas (but may vary across subcarriers). It is not necessary to know as beam-forming is phase invariant. Definition: The composite channel is Under calibration Mismatch ratio for antenna k of STA i John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Reciprocity of Composite Channel November 2004 Reciprocity of Composite Channel Reciprocity of physical channel: Reciprocity of composite channel, up to an unknown constant: by reciprocity of physical channel John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Calibration Uncorrected composite channel: November 2004 Calibration Uncorrected composite channel: Since A and B are diagonal matrices, we can work element-wise: Thus STA 1 mismatch ratio STA 2 mismatch ratio reciprocity X John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Calibration (2) Calibration of STA 2 uses both and . November 2004 Calibration (2) Calibration of STA 2 uses both and . Select fixed k1. For k2 = 0, …, N-1 because k1 is fixed John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Two Types of STA Correction Capabilities November 2004 Two Types of STA Correction Capabilities Basic BF-Rx only STA Does not transmit BF Does not apply any corrections BF-Tx&Rx STA STA can transmit and receive BF Must have Tx correction capability John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Basic DL Only BF Solution November 2004 Basic DL Only BF Solution BF transmission BF only in DL (AP → client) Client is a BF-Rx only STA Client Calibration Exchange AP sends sounding PPDU to client on DL May or may not transmitted with correction Client responds with sounding packet (no correction) containing DL channel estimates from previous AP PPDU in data payload AP has both UL and (uncorrected) DL channel estimates AP calculates both AP and client correction coefficients If not already calibrated, AP my also calculate its own correction coefficients as well John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Basic Rx Only Solution Packet Exchange November 2004 Basic Rx Only Solution Packet Exchange Sounding packets from client (carrying RAC or RTS, and/or ACK) provide uncorrected composite UL channel AP corrects UL channel estimate by applying client Tx correction coefficients AP calculates SVD for corrected UL channel transpose AP transmits SVD using AP correction coefficients Key features of basic Rx solution Minimal complexity at the client Client requirements are only that the client transmit sounding packets and participate in the calibration protocol exchange including transmitting channel estimates in protocol packet data payload. AP complexity AP must apply Tx corrections to DL BF transmissions, and AP must store client correction coefficients for UL channel estimate correction John S. Sadowsky, Intel

Summary and Conclusion November 2004 Summary and Conclusion Basic Rx-only BF Tx correction capability is not mandatory This eliminates complex multiplies form low cost clients Mandatory requirements for basic STA Ability to transmit sounding packets Calibration exchange Respond to inquiry by sending channel estimates Additional Calibration Protocols Support for bi-directional BF Modification of Rx-only protocol is straight-forward John S. Sadowsky, Intel