UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey Q results.

Advertisements

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey Results from Quarter 4 – 2009/10 The results are shown as a percentage of the total responses.

TAFE NSW Teacher Advisory and Assessment Scheme Policy Training Assessment Activity – TAA1 Action Plan Suitable for Advisor / Assessor – ( Institute Representative.

Making the most of your Meet the Buyer appointments

Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.

QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS QUESTION ASKEDYESNO 1.How long have you received service? 12 months Did a supervisor conduct.

30 th August 2006 ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR SOLAR SERVICE DELIVERY Saliya J. Ranasinghe.

Training and development Education Evaluation: Benefits to Trust and its Learners Clinical skills training Education Quality Team May 2014 Training and.

Customer Care delivering a first class service Striving for excellence.

Richard Philp New Zealand Inland Revenue Department Session No. 7 Conclusions for tax policy and revenue administration from compliance studies, perception.

Challenges Faced in Developing Audit Plans and Programs 21 st March, 2013.

Getting ready for the future: Preparing for the KS3 ICT onscreen test Sue Walton Project Director, KS3 ICT onscreen test development project Luton March.

2010 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EVALUATION REPORT SUMMARY The provision of training and technical assistance (TA) to provider agencies is an integral component.

Better Deal for Business Presentation to Providers of Publicly Funded Services Presenter Name Job Title Organisation.

Chapter 5 – The Client. Definition of the Client n Differences between Internal and External Clients.

1 FY04 ORS Performance Management Manage Information Technology Team Members: Charlie Jones, Ben Ashtiani, Denny Bermudez, La'Tanya Burton, Ron Edwards,

Version 10.0  The High Performance Organisation Ltd Creating A Process Based Management System 1 Welcome Creating a Process Based Management.

2 YEAR COURSE. COURSE AIMS  To enable students to investigate a range of areas within business  To provide students with the knowledge, understanding.

Powered by Foster Parent Survey 2015 Tuesday, July 28, 2015.

Assessing General Practices’ Capacity to Participate in Research Organisational Factors Influencing the Research Capacity of General Practices Jocelyn.

Mitcham Medical Centre PATIENT SURVEY –Purpose of the survey was to assess the quality of our services and review areas requiring improvement –Survey.

Outcome 1 – Effectiveness in the workplace Outcome 2 – Changing working practices Outcome 3 – Recruiting and supporting staff Outcome 4 – Meetings Outcome.

Report on the evaluation of the Independent prison Visitors System by Ms Jacqui Gallinetti, CLC UWC.

Consistent & Reliable Customer Service Unit 4 P2 + M2.

Obtain and review client feedback. Creating evaluation or feedback tools Importance of client feedback  The use of client feedback is very useful to.

YAHOO TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE Welcome to you.

After-Session Actions

Web Development Services

HUMAN RESOURCES | SERVICE EXCELLENCE SURVEY

Assessment of Seafarers

Provide reception services

Understanding CAEP Fees & Accreditation Costs

‘We didn’t need you, but it was good to know you were there’

Erin N. Panepucci is an Administrative Assistant with vast experience in administrative support, program management, and customer service. She has efficiently.

Stakeholder Survey Prepared for: Seafish Date: May 2016.

FPG Child Development Institute

CCC Library Strategic Plan

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion – The Business Case

CAEP Orientation: Newcomers

Volunteer Role Description for: Location: Main contact:

UNIT V QUALITY SYSTEMS.

Auditing & Investigations I

Google chrome toll free number Dial

Portfolio Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion

Business Communication Dr. Aravind Banakar –

Business Communication

Business Communication

Short term Medium term Long term

Law Society of Scotland Survey of members 2017

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

Volunteer Role Description for: Location: Main contact:

2 Service: The Heart of Hospitality. 2 Service: The Heart of Hospitality.

Tuesday 17th December Mr Nicholls

Performance Evaluations

ACCREDITATION PROCESS SASSETA ETQA DIVISION PRESENTER: LYDIA MACHOBANE

Eurostat User Satisfaction Survey

Dealing with users: From the quality of the reception to the quality of the service provided Hello!

Conducting Concerns Surveys

Thank You!! For More Information Visit: m/ Call to :

Research Participant Satisfaction

Investing in Volunteers

Identifying Data Needs:

Why Accreditation, why IQIPS?

Howard Cottage STAR Survey 2017 Results

Yahoo Mail Customer Service Number.

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey

Tower Hill Partnership Survey Results

CEng progression through the IOM3

Presentation transcript:

UKAS Customer Satisfaction Survey Q2 2016/17 results

How satisfied are you with UKAS’ overall service to your organisation over the last year?

In the experience of your organisation how does last year's service compare with the previous year?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that UKAS understood your business needs?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that UKAS staff were easy to make contact with?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that UKAS generally responded to your needs in a timely manner?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your pre-visit arrangements well?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that your assessment team prepared well for your visit?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that your assessment team conducted visits well?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that your assessment team had the right skills and knowledge?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that your assessment team had the right attitude?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that the application of the accreditation requirements was consistent with the previous year?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handled your improvement actions promptly?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that UKAS handles your technical enquiries well?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied that UKAS handled your administrative enquiries well?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfies are you that UKAS handled your invoicing and related enquiries throughout the year conveniently and efficiently?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied that UKAS handled your extension to scope requests promptly?

Over the last twelve months, how satisfied are you that UKAS was effective in promoting awareness of accreditation and of the UKAS brand?

Reflecting on the last 12 months' experience of dealing with UKAS, how satisfied are you that UKAS provided value for money?

Thank you