PPH at the Israel Patent Office

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
Advertisements

Effective and Efficient Search and Examination of Patent Applications in Small and Medium Size IP Offices Effective and Efficient Search and Examination.
Michael D. Stein Principal Stein IP LLC 1400 Eye Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC (202) Patent Prosecution.
Implementing First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the AIA By: Scott D. Malpede, Seth Boeshore and Chitra Kalyanaraman USPTO Rules Effective March 16, 2013.
_1 STRATEGIC USE OF THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY Samson Helfgott Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP New York, NY WIPO Services and Initiatives Princeton,
1 © 2014 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved. Advantages and Disadvantages of PPH Mark Abumeri 9 November 2014 Asian Patent Attorneys.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
Q. TODD DICKINSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA) USPTO PUBLIC MEETING JULY 20, 2010 AIPLA Comments: Enhanced.
International Worksharing and its Perspective Inhong YEO International Cooperation Division.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) United States Patent and Trademark Office.
AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, 2010 Report on Patent Prosecution Highway Manny Schecter Chief Patent Counsel
Información Cientifico- tecnológica e industrial SEMINARIO LATINOAMERICANO SOBRE PROPRIEDAD INTELLECTUAL EN BIOTECNOLOGIA Cuernavaca, March 8, 2006 Anja.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
PATENT SEARCH Patent Awareness Seminar, Mumbai Andreya Fernandes Gopakumar Nair Associates Url:
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
1 Introduction to the Japan Patent Office Japan Patent Office.
Collaboration between WIPO & the Vancouver Group Technical infrastructure for improved international collaboration on search and examination John Alty.
1 Worksharing: A Cooperative Approach to Patent Workload Management Charles Eloshway Patent Attorney, Office of External Affairs USPTO.
Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
1 QUESTEL ORBIT.COM. 2 QUESTEL French company Producer and provider of online and internet services Collection of patents, trademarks, designs, scientific-technical.
Patent Cooperation Treaty and Application Conference September 24, 2012 Neal L. Slifkin 99 Garnsey Road Pittsford, NY (585)
Patent Protection in Europe
The Patent Prosecution Highway: Strategic Considerations in Accelerating U.S. and Foreign Patent Prosecution ACC Quick Hits June 13, 2012 Dr. John K. McDonald.
Who can file? Inventor Assignee of Inventor Legal Representative of Inventor or Assignee.
1 USPTO Experiences with the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Paolo Trevisan Patent Attorney Office of Policy and International Affairs United States Patent.
PPH Introduction to the Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
PPH in APAA Countries i. Status of PPH agreement and Statistics. ii. Benefits for Entering PPH Agreements. iii. Advantages of PPH compared to Other Accelerated.
PPH from the JPO Point of View Yutaka Niidome Deputy Director Japan Patent Office AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May 19, 2010.
After Final Practice Linda M. Saltiel June 2, 2015.
Presentation By Dr.S.N.Maity Controller General of Patents,Designs and TradeMarks.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
1 Patent Prosecution Highway -Mottainai Takaki Nishijima Nakamura & Partners January, 2012 AIPLA.
Revisions to Japanese Patent Law Before the law was revised, a Divisional Applications could not be filed after a Notice of Allowance 2.
1 Overview of USPTO Work-Sharing December 8, 2010 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting Bruce Kisliuk - Assistant Deputy Commissioner.
 Gill Jennings & Every LLP Cleantech and Green Channels  The what, why, where, and how – briefly!
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
1 IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO Ken-Ichi MOROOKA The Japan Patent Office Fordham IP Conference April 29, 2011.
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
Harmonization! Biotech/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting December 9, Mark R. Powell Special Advisor to the Commissioner for Patents.
1 Worksharing n Facilitated in the long-term by: –Legal harmonization –Systems harmonization n Current programs, projects and pilots aimed at worksharing:
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences May 15, Interference Practice Q&A James T. Moore Administrative Patent Judge
Patent search using Espacenet Practical example Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation and Technology Support Section.
Impact of PPH from a Global Perspective Moderator: Neil Henderson, BLG LLP Panel: Leonora Hoicka, IBM Corporation Aki Ryuka, RYUKA IP Law Firm, Japan IPIC.
Accelerated Patent Examination: Green Technology A Summary of Global Initiatives, with specific discussion of the US Speaker: Matt Prater Preparation help.
1 The Patent Prosecution Highway A Brief History and Current Status Mark R. Powell Director, TC 2600 USPTO.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
February 2016Patent Procedures Management PCT Direct Cost effective strategy for global patenting.
Niclas Morey, Director International Co-operation PCT developments at the EPO Partnership for Quality, Washington D.C.
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
Patent Cooperation Treaty Improvements Past, Present & Future
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
Who can file? Inventor Assignee of Inventor
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
Accelerating your Patent Prosecution in Mexico
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Best practices in the national phase Session 3
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eleventh Session
IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO
Patent Prosecution Highway(PPH)
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Sixth Session Cairo February 13 and 14, 2019.
EGYPO Organisational structure
Presentation transcript:

PPH at the Israel Patent Office Gershon Jochnowitz, Patent Examiner, ILPO November 26th, 2014

Expedited Examination Routes– out of turn Out of turn expedited examination routes in accordance to Article 19(a) of the law, have been formulated in order to: Enhance legal certainty of the public and the applicant by reducing the wait time until the first Office Action Facilitate prospective enforcement Promote public interest (relating to the old, promoting CleanTech, etc.) Share work products, thereby reducing duplications and backlogs Israel Patent Office

Expediting routes at the ILPO Affidavit Indication of patentability in a corresponding application Fee form + - PPH Age/Medical condition Public benefit Third party R&D delay IL Priority Claim (Commissioner’s Notice 28/11/2010) * Office action available in English Green Invention Suspected infringement It is possible to accelerate the examination via the commissioners notice, and then use the PPH in a corresponding authority. * The applicant is not required to be an Israeli citizen Israel Patent Office

Types of PPH PPH: Relies on work products done by a national authority. PCT-PPH: Relies on work products done by an International authority. MOTTAINAI (PPH/PCT-PPH): Doesn’t require that the priority application be applied at the OEE. GPPH: A pool of authorities that apply PPH and PCT-PPH (MOTTAINAI) between them. The GPPH uses a single set of requirements and its aim is to simplify and improve the existing PPH arrangements therefore making the PPH more accessible to the applicants. Israel Patent Office

Eligibility Requirements PPH Requirements Eligibility Requirements The applications before the Office of Earlier Examination (OEE) and the Office of Later Examination (OLE) have the same earliest date (which may be the priority date or the filing date). The OEE has found at least one claim to be allowable.   All claims presented for examination under the PPH pilot must sufficiently correspond to one or more of the claims found allowable by the OEE The OLE has not begun substantive examination of the application. Israel Patent Office

PPH Requirements Supporting documentation required for PPH request: A completed PPH request form; A copy of the work product(s) which are relevant to the allowability of the claims of the corresponding OEE application, if not available via Dossier Access Systems; and A copy of the claims found to be allowable by the OEE, if not available via Dossier Access Systems.   Offices may also require the applicant to provide the following documentation: Copies of citations raised against the OEE application which are not available to the OLE via their regular databases or search files; Translations of any of the documents, and A claim correspondence table that shows the relationship between the claims of the OLE application and those of the OEE application that were considered allowable. Israel Patent Office

About the formal examination in the PPH Fast formal examination. In order to further expedite the substantial examination, the substantive examiner’s contact details are mentioned in the Office Action. Only one chance to amend. Examination guidelines have been updated and are public online. Common Q&A have been updated and are public online. Adoption of a common GPPH form will take place early 2015. Plans for raising awareness to the PPH through notifying applicants in “Confirmation of submission notice” and “Notice before allowance”. Considering allowing postponing of examination in favor of PPH requests Redesigned PPH web page. If there is time, show them the web page Israel Patent Office

PPH arrangements at the ILPO GPPH United States of America (PPH and PCT-PPH) China (PPH and PCT-PPH) Denmark (PPH and PCT-PPH) Japan (PPH and PCT-PPH) Finland (PPH and PCT-PPH) Canada (PPH) South Korea (PPH and PCT-PPH) Spain (PPH and PCT-PPH) Israel (PCT-PPH) EPO (2015, In process) We were one of the first to join the GPPH Israel Patent Office

Common PPH Request Form 01/2015 Israel Patent Office

Common PPH Request Form 01/2015 Israel Patent Office

PPH Applications by classification - 2014 A Human Necessities B Performing Operations ;Transporting C Chemistry ;Metallurgy D Textiles ;Paper E Fixed Constructions F Mechanical Engineering ;Lighting ;Heating ;Weapons ;Blasting G Physics H Electricity Israel Patent Office

2014 Applications by type of PPH Arrangement Israel Patent Office

2014 Applications by Country Of First Examination Israel Patent Office

PPH Requests by the Agent Israel Patent Office

Applications by year Israel Patent Office

Use of ILPO work products by other Patent Offices Number of PPH requests (using ILPO products) Total Russia Australia Canada U.S.A. Office 10 2 4 Number * As of June 2014 Number of PPH requests (using ILPO-PCT products) Total Israel Japan U.S.A. Office 21 3 15 Number * As of June 2014 Israel Patent Office

ILPO PPH Status Report Average no. of Office Actions Average Pendency from PPH Request to Final Decision (months) Average Pendency from PPH Request to First Office Action (months) First Action Allowance Rate (%) Route 0.7 3.8 2.0 53.5 PPH 0.8 3.3 1.3 57.1 PCT-PPH * Many of the applications also request modified examination by 17c. Grant rate isn’t showed due to not having enough applications to anticipate a realistic figure. * Almost no rejections during 2014 Israel Patent Office

Possible Effects of Expedited Examinations Possible Effects on ILPO Reduce backlog Reduce duplication in search and examination Work-product sharing with foreign PTOs Possible effects on Applicants and Public Higher legal and business certainty A more user friendly patent system due to the harmonization Reduction in costs due to less office actions Israel Patent Office

Modified Examination Routes– “In turn” examination “In turn” modified examination routes have been formulated in order to: Enhance the public’s and the applicant’s legal certainty through harmonization Reduce the PTO’s work load Includes Article 17c and Commissioner Circular M.N 70 Modified examination and Expedited examination are not dependent and can be used together or separately Israel Patent Office

PPH@justice.gov.il Israel Patent Office