Virginia CubeSat Constellation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEWTONIAN MECHANICS. Kinematic equations Frictional Force.
Advertisements

Attitude Control of the CubeSail Solar Sailing Spacecraft Victoria Coverstone, Andy Pukniel University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Rod Burton, Dave.
Accounting for Angular Momentum Chapter 21. Objectives Understand the basic fundamentals behind angular momentum Be able to define measures of rotary.
Attitude Determination and Control System Peer Review December 2003.
Kedrick Black1 ECE 5320 Mechatronics Assignment #1 Torque Coils/Rods and Reaction Wheels Kedrick Black.
Attitude Determination and Control
What would the loop do in this situation? The loop will rotate about an axis halfway between the left and right sides of the circuit, parallel to the plane.
Karla Vega University of California, Berkeley Attitude Determination and Control 6/9/2015.
FIREBIRD Ian Lyon Engineering and Physics Carroll College Simulation of the Precise Separation of a Two-Nanosatellite System using Differential Drag.
Feasibility of Demonstrating PPT’s on FalconSAT-3 C1C Andrea Johnson United States Air Force Academy.
Spring Topic Outline for Physics 1 Spring 2011.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Give the expression for the velocity of an object rolling down an incline without slipping in terms of h (height), M(mass), g, I (Moment of inertia) and.
Gravity Control Comprehensive
Lesson 3: Design for Remote Sensing Your Mission 1; just like a real CubeSat.
Why Design Tool? 93 年 10 月 21 日. EPS Course - 2 Simple Problems Close form solution Complex Problems Computer.
Week 7 Status Updates. Statement of Work: To design and prototype an attitude control system (ACS) for a Cube-Sat. This ACS will align the Cube-Sat with.
Guidance, Navigation and Controls Subsystem Winter 1999 Semester Review.
CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Platform Phillip HempelPaul Mears Daniel ParcherTaffy Tingley December 5, 2001The University of Texas at Austin.
1 Topics in Space Weather Topics in Space Weather Lecture 14 Space Weather Effects On Technological Systems Robert R. Meier School of Computational Sciences.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Applications Phillip HempelPaul Mears Daniel ParcherTaffy Tingley October 11, 2001The University of Texas at Austin.
Introduction: The on-board measurements available for control are a dual-slit sensor to find the elevation of the sun and a magnetometer to measure the.
Lecture 37: FRI 19 NOV Ch.33 Electromagnetic Waves I Heinrich Hertz (1857–1894) Physics 2113 Jonathan Dowling.
Magnetic Field Lines Graphical Illustration of Magnetic Fields Lines start on north pole and end on south pole Opposite poles attract, like poles reply.
Fuzzy Controller for Spacecraft Attitude Control CHIN-HSING CHENG SHENG-LI SHU Dept. of Electrical Engineering Feng-Chia University IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON.
Chapter 25 Magnetism. Magnets 2 Magnets: interact on iron objects / other magnets 1) North pole (N-pole) & south pole (S-pole) 2) Opposite poles attract,
Be P16102 Constrain Subsystems House Internals Provide Access Mount components securely Stow Solar Panels Gather Solar Energy Expose Panels before Deployment.
Electrodynamic Tether Payload RIT SPEX Acknowledgements This work was supported by Provost’s Learning Innovation Grant, Kate Gleason College.
LC Circuit Section 22.5 There is a characteristic frequency at which the circuit will oscillate, called the resonance frequency.
Some Preliminaries What is modern physics? How does it differ from, and in what ways is it similar to, classical physics?" What central ideas of classical.
ODU CubeSat MAE 435 Midterm Presentation – June 21, 2016 Cornelius Aaron Malcom-Scott Edwards Heather Culley Josh Frechem Jonathan DeGroff Owen Parkinson.
SECTION 2 Components part 1.
Equations, Performance, Electrical Equivalent Circuits
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
KUFASAT STUDENTS’ SATELLITE
Environment Simulator
Smart Nanosatellite Attitude Propagator ssl.engineering.uky.edu/snap
Aerodynamic Attitude Control for CubeSats
Electromagnetic Waves
E or B? It Depends on Your Perspective
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
The Earth is {image} meters from the sun
Copyright © 2005 by Fran De Aquino
ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory
Chapter 31 Faraday’s Law 31.1 Faraday’s Law of Induction
Electromagnetic Waves
IB Physics 12 Mr. Jean December 10th, 2013.
Devil physics The baddest class on campus Ap Physics
Lorentz Forces The force F on a charge q moving with velocity v through a region of space with electric field E and magnetic field B is given by: 11/23/2018.
Magnetic Fields Contents: Overview What Produces Magnetic Field
RIT Space Exploration Group (SPEX)
An Introduction To ‘High Speed’ Physics
ECE699 – 004 Sensor Device Technology
Today’s agenda: Electromagnetic Waves.
Attitude Determination and Control Preliminary Design Review
RocketSat VII Construction of an Attitude Determination System for a Sounding Rocket COSGC Symposium April 9, 2011.
Attitude Determination Overview
5. Magnetic forces on current
Unit 2- Force and Motion Vocabulary- Part I.
IlliniSat-3 Power Board
Equations, Performance, Electrical Equivalent Circuits
Chapter 31 Faraday’s Law 31.1 Faraday’s Law of Induction
ECEN5341/4341 Spring 2019 Lecture 2 January 16,2019.
What is Physical Science? What makes up our Universe?
Lecture 33: FRI 03 APR Ch.33.1–3,5: E&M Waves
Prof. Leonardo M. Reyneri
Presentation transcript:

Virginia CubeSat Constellation

CubeSat Advisors: Mechanical: Dr. Robert Ash ECE: Dr. Dimitrie Popescu 435 Team Members: Kevin Scott- Team Lead Robert Kelly- Orbital modeling and power Austin Rogers- Attitude control (Physical) Joseph Kingett-Attitude control (Logic) Matthew Degroff- Prototyping and Thermal

Background -CubeSat pico satellites have been used for the past 15 years for small orbital missions. -Drag forces acting on orbiting objects depend on the shape, speed and local density of the atmosphere. -Local Low Earth Orbits (LEO) densities are controlled by solar activity. -The science data obtained from single satellite missions cannot deliver an accurate model of the LEO densities. This is due to satellites traveling much faster than the thermal speeds of the gas particles in the medium. -As a consequence, the measurements made aboard a spacecraft are similar to a series of photographic snapshots from different locations.

Mission Objectives 1. Successfully develop, integrate, test and fly a 1U CubeSat in an orbital constellation of three 1U CubeSats (with VT, HU, and UVa) 2. Obtain measurements of the orbital decay of a constellation of satellites to develop a database of atmospheric drag and atmospheric properties 3. Demonstrate a system to determine relative and absolute spacecraft position across an orbiting constellation. 4. Successfully deploy a drag brake to document orbital lifetime reduction via alteration of ballistic coefficient.

CubeSat Team Structure:

Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS) - Physical Components Magnetorquers use the interaction between their own electrically-induced magnetic field and the magnetic field of the Earth to control satellite attitude. Digital simulations gained favor over physical ADCS testing CubeSat component selection: GOM Space P110-series solar panels with integrated magnetorquers (x and y axes) GOM Space custom PCB magnetorquer (z axis)

ADCS - Control Logic Magnetorquers follow the equation: τ=μ×B τ is the magnetic torque result μ is the magnetic moment of the solenoid B is the Earth’s magnetic field I B If current is flowing through the wire, it produces a magnetic field It will react with the ambient magnetic field producing a torque that acts about an axis that is orthogonal to the plane containing μ and B Producing rotation about the torque axis

Sun Sensors The sun sensor is essentially a photoresistor. This component has a changing resistance value dependent upon the level of light that the sensor is exposed to. The use of the sen sensor for attitude determination uses these principles to predict the position of the sun relative to the CubeSat inertial frame. Intensity changes dependent upon the incident angle. Comparing the currents measured at an incident angle and a max tabulated value The ratio of these values can be used as a cosine of the incident angle Multiplying the cos(α) term with estimated solar distance will produce the distance in the normal direction IRec= IMaxcos(α) α CubeSat

Simulated Environment Uses local magnetic field, initial angular velocity, initial orientation, and the dipole moment of the magnetorquers as initial parameters Simulates what a magnetometer would read when rotating through a constant magnetic field Estimated the torque produced by a magnetorquer when a current of 0.5 A is applied through it Parameters are editable to focus on individual parts or inputs

Power Simulations using a feature of Satellite Toolkit (STK), called the Solar Panel Tool, were completed for a period from March 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. These used the custom model of the CubeSat with both 4 and 3 side solar panels. For the four solar panel configuration, average instantaneous power generation was 1.40 W. For three panels, 1.33 W.

Orbital Simulations Orbit simulations using STK’s High Precision Orbit Propagator (HPOP) found the following values for orbit lifetimes: Drag Brake Deployed: 57 days for Cd = 4.04 Drag Brake Undeployed: 330 days for Cd = 2.39

Orbital Simulation

Prototyping and CubeSat Development -Constrained by Nanorack deployment system (ISS Deployer) -Two piece design -Drag brake is designed into main rail housing -10cm x 10cm sides -rails are 100mm end-to-end -rails act as guides and house switches and springs for deployment

Material Selection Results Estimated Max. Deflection Estimated Max. von Mises Stress Aluminum 6061 0.04 mm 6.3E+7 Pa Windform XT 2.0 0.1 mm 4.05E+7 Pa

Material Selection Aluminum 6061 Windform XT 2.0

Gantt

Questions?