Fig 6. Procedure for generating NURBS mesh at a junction of fibers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Elements Jake Blanchard Spring 2008.
Advertisements

Higher-order Linked Interpolation in Thick Plate Finite Elements
FE analysis with beam elements
Chapter 9 Extension, Torsion and Flexure of Elastic Cylinders
Micromechanics Macromechanics Fibers Lamina Laminate Structure Matrix.
Advanced Ideas and Examples Defining buckling modes Why define buckling modes? Understanding higher modes Utilizing higher modes Handling Indistinct modes.
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Structures and stress BaDI 1.
Chapter Outline Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design.
Lecture 26: Mechanical Properties I: Metals & Ceramics
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN The functionality of SolidWorks Simulation depends on which software Simulation product is used. The functionality of different producs.
N-W.F.P University of Engineering & Technology Peshawar
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering A one-field discontinuous Galerkin formulation of non-linear Kirchhoff-Love shells Ludovic Noels Computational.
ME 520 Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis
Motion and Stress Analysis by Vector Mechanics Edward C. Ting Professor Emeritus of Applied Mechanics Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN National Central.
Beams and Deflections Zach Gutzmer, EIT
MODELLING THE PULLOUT OF HOOKED STEEL FIBERS FROM CEMENTITIOUS MATRIX Edmunds Zīle, Olga Zīle Institute of Polymer Mechanics Riga, Latvia.
An introduction to the finite element method using MATLAB
3. Stresses in Machine Elements Lecture Number – 3.1 Prof. Dr. C. S. Pathak Department of Mechanical Engineering Sinhgad College of Engineering, Pune Strength.
Stress constrained optimization using X-FEM and Level Set Description
Structural Design for Cold Region Engineering Lecture 14 Thory of Plates Shunji Kanie.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001 S7-1 MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001MAR120, Section 7, December 2001 SECTION 7 CHOICE OF ELEMENTS: TOPOLOGY AND RESTARTING.
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
Buckling Capacity of Pretwisted Steel Columns: Experiments and Finite Element Simulation Farid Abed & Mai Megahed Department of Civil Engineering American.
Stress and Strain ( , 3.14) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components NC State University Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Stress.
Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.
ME 330 Engineering Materials Lecture 3 Tension/Bending/Torsion/Material Selection Bending Torsion Material Selection Techniques Please read Chapter 6.
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
Mechanics of Materials -Beams
PRESENTED BY: Arpita Patel( ) Patel priya( )
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Shaping operations are generally divided into three groups based upon how the parent metal flows or deforms during the shaping process ,namely Bending.
Chapter 4. Mechanical Testing: Tension Test and Other Basic Tests
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Torsion of opened cross sections.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES
Solid Mechanics Course No. ME213.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Introduction We select materials for many components and applications by matching the properties of the material to the service condition required of the.
9. Methods of Determining Work Hardening Characteristics
Mechanics of Biomaterials
contents Design of beams (week 11,12,13), (10,17,24 Nov.)
Thin Walled Pressure Vessels
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Chrono::FEA Validation.
Effective bending moment method
Ch. 2: Fundamental of Structure
326MAE (Stress and Dynamic Analysis) 340MAE (Extended Stress and Dynamic Analysis)
Theory of Simple Bending
Numerical Modeling of Geometric and Material Properties of Tricuspid Valves Chen Shen, Manuel Rausch  University of Texas at Austin/Department of Aerospace.
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Aerodynamic Analysis of Airplane Winglet to Maximize Design Efficiency Cooper Gould   Texas Christian University 2901 Stadium Drive TCU Box Fort.
University of Liège Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical and Biological Evaluation of Murine Dermis in the Scope of Pressure Ulcer Formation William Meador, Claire Long, Hannah Story, Manuel Rausch.
3 Torsion.
A generic fiber model algorithm for the analysis of arbitrary cross sections under biaxial bending and axial load Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis.
Propagation of Mechanical Stress through the Actin Cytoskeleton toward Focal Adhesions: Model and Experiment  Raja Paul, Patrick Heil, Joachim P. Spatz,
ME 323 Final Lecture – April 2012
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Dr. Mohammed Abdulrazzaq
Finite element analysis of the wrinkling of orthotropic membranes
Presentation transcript:

Fig 6. Procedure for generating NURBS mesh at a junction of fibers Modeling Fibrin Network using 3D spatial Euler-Bernoulli Beam Soham Mane, Dr. Manuel Rausch   Department of Aerospace Engineering & Engineering Mechanics The University of Texas at Austin W. R. Woolrich Laboratories, C0600 ,210 East 24th Street, Austin, Texas, 78712-1221, E-mail: sohammane@utexas.edu Abstract Thrombus is vital to our well-being as blood coagulation prevents bleeding after vascular injury. However, thrombus role is diametrical in that pathological coagulation also causes deep vein thrombosis, heart attacks, and strokes. Thrombus’ propensity to detach and emboli, and thus cause havoc, is strongly linked to its mechanical properties, which are primarily determined by its fibrin backbone. To understand how thrombus macromechanics (such as its failure behavior) are linked to its microstructure, we have developed a numerical model of thrombus’ 3D microstructure. Specifically, in a representative volume element (RVE), we model each individual fibrin fiber as a 3D spatial Euler-Bernoulli beam, whose behavior is driven by St Venant-Kirchhoff material law. We implement and solve the resulting formulation in an Isogeometric framework. We have validated our formulation for single fiber against three benchmark problems. A technique for discretizing multiple connected fibers using NURBS shape functions is developed. We use Voronoi tessellations to generate random networks and discretize them using the technique developed. 1. Introduction Fibrin network determines strength of thrombus. Fibrin is a protein which polymerizes to form a stable network which provides scaffold for forming a thrombi. Along with the mechanical properties of fibrin, the geometry of the fibrin network governs the overall mechanical properties of thrombi. We have developed a numerical model to study role of network geometry and mechanical properties of individual fiber in determining overall mechanical properties of the network. Each fiber is modelled as a 3D spatial Euler-Bernoulli beam. Finite deformations are considered and Green-Lagrange strain measure is used. The structural element considered is based on Bernoulli kinematics, which assume that cross sections remain orthogonal to the centerline after deformation and there are no changes of the cross sectional dimensions. Torsion is considered while warping is neglected. These assumptions hold true because a typical fibrin fiber has a diameter orders smaller than its length. The structural element developed here has four degrees of freedom (DOFs) where three DOFs define positions of the centerline while fourth DOF defines relative rotation around the centerline. We have considered isotropic elastic material for the time being. St. Venant-Krichhoff material law is used here, which require only two material parameters, Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio namely. This element is developed in Isogeometric frame work, wherein NURBS shape functions are used to discretize the weak form and implemented in MATLAB. Validation of the numerical model for a single fiber is discussed in the second section while technique for connecting multiple fibers and generating a 2D random network based on Voronoi tessellations is discussed in the third section. 2. Validation with benchmark problems We have tested our formulation on three popular benchmark problems widely used in the literature. The first example is a cantilevered beam with point moment applied at the tip. For a particular value of the moment, the beam curls up into a circle. The second example is a 45 degree arch clamped on one end and loaded with out of plane point load on the other. This example test the formulation for bending and torsion interaction for initially curved beams. Tip displacement values from the literature are compared against our results. The third example includes a shallow arch loaded at the crown with a point load. Displacement controlled simulation is performed to capture the load-deflection curve of the arch. Our formulation is capable of capturing the snap-through behavior and closely agrees with the curve from the literature. This example is tried with NURBS of different order and it is found that lower order NURBS (2nd & 3rd) require large number of elements as compared to higher order NURBS (5th & 6th) however using second order or third order NURBS with higher number of elements is computationally efficient that using higher order NURBS with less elements. 3. Random network We have developed a technique to connect multiple fibers at a point. This is required to generate a random network in order to test it under different mechanical loading scenarios. We have used Voronoi tessellations for generating 2D random networks. These can simulate 2D cross-linked fibrin networks. The assumption is that wherever we have crosslinking, we have perfect bonding between the fibers. The process for generating a NURBS mesh for a network is descripted in the figure (add figure no) below. The fibers in the randomly generated network are straight, however our formulation is capable of simulating response of initially curved fibers. One of the reason for selecting Voronoi tessellations for generating 2D random networks is the feature that no more than 3 fibers intersect in a 2D Voronoi unit cell. In a real fibrin network it is observed that a single fiber branches out into two fibers. Thus this geometrical feature is capture in our random network model. Fig 3 Reference and Deformed configurations of cantilever beam with tip moment applied on one end. (The beam curls into a circular for the applied value of the tip moment) Fig 4. Geometry, Deformed Shape and Load-displacement curve for shallow arch for order three NURBS and different number of elements & by S. H. Lo Fig 1. SEM micrographs of fibrin clots: (A) Clot with thick fibers and few branch points. (B) Clot with thin fibers and many branch points. Fig 5. 45 degree circular arch cantilevered at one end Fig 2. Transmission electron micrographs of negatively contrasted fibrin fibers that show the substructure of branch points. Fig 6. Procedure for generating NURBS mesh at a junction of fibers Typical junction with 3 fibers intersecting at a point Separate the fibers by making cut from the point of intersection Find control points for defining circular arc between fibers Define arcs connecting fibers and bending strips connecting fibers to arcs Fig 7. Random 2D Voronoi Network with 50 seeds Fig 8. NURBS mesh for the randomly generated 2D Voronoi network ( control points of fibers in red & fibers shown in blue) Fig 9. Deformed shapes of 50 seed network for 5%, 10%, and 15% strain and Load Vs Displacement curves upto 10% and 15% strain Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference The University of Texas at Austin April 4-6, 2018