A-5 Limits on amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between Synchronous Areas according to Article 118(z) SOGL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

Regional Policy Delegated Act on the methodology for the quality review of major projects 1 Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI.
Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren Workshop, Ljubljana, 13 Sept 2011.
Draft Framework Guidelines on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms for the European Gas Transmission Network Benoît Esnault, CRE Presentation Workshop Ljubljana,
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
Network Code LFC&R Reserve Provision – TSO-Perspective
Amine Abada 06/10/2014 ERI SWE TERRE #2 Trans European Replacement Reserve Exchange.
Trading rules in Lithuania Giedrius Radvila Lietuvos energija AB 3 July 2006, Riga II MINI-FORA.
Draft cross-regional roadmap for Long-Term Transmission Rights Still work in progress, for discussion 27 June 2011.
How the Implementation of the Network Code Does Help Infrastructure Users Vasile FLOREA Director of Commercial Balancing SNTGN TRANSGAZ SA Medias.
The General Tax Law. General Tax Law was applicable from 1 January 2003 On 1 January 2009, a new General Tax Act (GTA) came into force. It was amended.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
PROPOSALS THE REVIEW OF THE 1958 AGREEMENT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL (IWVTA) IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session.
Action for establishing a Single Auction Office for CSE Electricity Regional Initiative - Central-South Region 2 nd Stakeholders Group Meeting 21 April.
NBTC/ITU Workshop on Cross-Border Frequency Coordination June , 2015 Bangkok, Thailand István Bozsóki Head of Division BDT/IEE/SBD 1.
The Draft SADC Annex on Trade in Services UNCTAD Secretariat Sub-regional Conference on Improving Industrial Performance and Promoting Employment in SADC.
PROPOSAL CAM PROPOSAL FOR HARMONISATION 14 th SG meeting Madrid 11 th July 2011.
Electricity Regional Initiative Central Eastern European Region Congestion Management – Status & Prospects Tahir Kapetanovic E-Control CEE Stakeholder.
XIV th Florence Forum 24/25 September 2007 Tahir Kapetanovic / Nicolas Bonnesoeur Chairmen of the CEER Electricity Security of Supply TF C07-SOS-03-03a.
Benoît Esnault Commission de Régulation de l’Energie (CRE) - ERGEG 19th Madrid Forum, March 2011 Preparatory work for Framework Guideline Tariffs.
New Rail Market Access Rules Directive 2012/34/EU (recast) EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
BALANCING IN THE BALTIC REGION WG CONCLUSIONS Ingrid Arus Riga/ Baltic Mini-Fora meeting, 24 th of April 2009.
Cross border redispatching Central West Electricity Regional Energy Market Mini Forum Alain Marien 20 th of June 2006.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
Walter Boltz & Asta Sihvonen-Punkka, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package Brussels, 11 th December 2008 Implementing the 3 rd Package Framework.
Guidelines on Coordination of collective bargaining European Trade Union Institute 1 Guidelines on Coordination of Collective Bargaining Presentation European.
Madrid 15 th June 2009 OS Agreement to Reserve Capacity 10 th IG meeting.
BALTIC BALANCING MARKET Ingrid Arus Baltic Balancing Market Harmonisation WG meeting
Capacity Allocation Mechanism Iberian overview 13 th SG meeting Madrid 7 th Feb 2011 DRAFT – Portugal / Spain.
BALTIC ELECTRICITY MARKET MINIFORA Vilnius 23 November 2006 Tasks of the summary of the IG discussion paper on the Baltic ITC mechanism Dace Bite Public.
Gas Regional Initiative North West Region - Draft Framework Guidelines Capacity Allocation Mechanisms BNetzA/CRE Pre-Comitology Meeting Bonn – 26 May 2011.
Working Group # 3 –Settlement: Principles 8 soundness of the settlement, 9 monetary settlements and 10 physical deliveries.
UPDATES ON THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN LITHUANIA Aistija Zubaviciute NCC, Lithuania 11 th Baltic Electricity Market Mini-Forum 1 st October 2010.
Madrid 16 th February 2009 TSOs presentation 8 th IG meeting.
Interconnector Physical Notification submissions following XBID (Cross Border Intra Day) market implementation; the cross border gate closure definition.
Ex-ante state aid control initial assessment of the planned state aid performed by the Ministry of Finance.
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren 20 th Madrid Forum, 26 Sept 2011.
Agenda TSOG 8th November
Congestion Management
Geert Van Hauwermeiren Workshop, Ljubljana, 13 Sept 2011
Transposition of European Network Codes
EBGL implementation Organization
26th IG meeting 23th January 2014
2009 TSO Transparency Gas Regional Initiative North-West
Background and Process
Regulators’ update on Congestion Management and Balancing
Gas Regional Initiative
18th July 2016 Teleconference
KORRR INFORMAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
Topic Operational Information Exchange
Stakeholder Workshop on EB GL Implementation
Update from Balancing Stakeholder Group
Synchronous Area Framework Agreement for RG CE
Imbalance Netting Platform
Counter-activations Compromise proposal for counter-activations in the mFRR- and aFRR-Platforms.
Electricity Balancing Stakeholder Group Brussels, 19 November 2018
FAT aFRR Summary memo.
Amendment to the NUTS Regulation Oliver Heiden Eurostat.E4
18th July 2016 Teleconference
ACER opinion on ENTSOG’s 2011 Ten-Year Network Development Plan
A-6 Limits on amount of exchange or sharing of RR between Synchronous Areas according to Article 118(aa) SOGL.
Proposal for a Cost Benefit Analysis methodology in accordance with Article 156 (11) of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1485 of 2 August 2017 Luca.
ESF INFORMAL TWG Prague, 2-3 April 2009 Lump sums grants
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Survey on Ancillary services procurement, Balancing market design 2018
Svetlana Rybina, Lauri Holopainen
Baltic synchronization plan
Trans European Replacement Reserve Exchange
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
Presentation transcript:

A-5 Limits on amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between Synchronous Areas according to Article 118(z) SOGL

1 2 3 4 Index Introduction FRR limits between SA proposal Conclusions Q&A

Introduction

Introduction Background Article 118 (Synchronous area operational agreements) of SO GL establishes: By 12 months after entry into force this Regulation, all TSOs of each synchronous area shall jointly develop a common proposal for: … limits on the amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between synchronous areas in accordance with article 176(1) for exchange and article 177(1) for sharing

Introduction Article 176 (FRR exchange limit between SA) of SO GL establishes: All TSOs of each synchronous area shall specify in the synchronous area operational agreement a method to determine the limits for the exchange of FRR with other synchronous areas. That method shall take into account: the operational impact between the synchronous areas; the stability of the FRP of the synchronous area; the ability of TSOs of the synchronous area to comply with the frequency quality target parameters defined in accordance with Article 127 and the FRCE target parameters defined in accordance with Article 128; and the operational security. Article 177 (FRR sharing limit between SA) of SO GL establishes: All TSOs of each synchronous area shall specify in the synchronous area operational agreement a method to determine the limits for the sharing of FRR with other synchronous areas. That method shall take into account: the operational impact between the synchronous areas; the stability of the FRP of the synchronous area; the maximum reduction of FRR that can be taken into account in the FRR dimensioning in accordance with Article 157 as a result of the FRR sharing; the ability of TSOs of the synchronous area to comply with the frequency quality target parameters defined in accordance with Article 127 and the FRCE target parameters defined in accordance with Article 128; and the operational security.

Explanation of Exchange and Sharing Principle for Reserve Power

Exchange Example: FCR Exchange between Synchronous Areas (SA) Central Europe (CE) and Northern Europe (NE/Nordic) Initial dimensioning obligation without Exchange of Reserves: CE NE 3000 MW 1500 MW Figure: Amout of Reserve Power physically connected to Synchronous Area

Exchange Example: FCR Exchange between Synchronous Areas (SA) Central Europe (CE) and Northern Europe (NE/Nordic) Now: Exchange of 100 MW (NE receiving reserves/CE providing reserves) Priority reserve access for receiving SA Reserve is geographically shifted but the sum of total reserve capacity remains constant CE 3000 MW 3100 MW NE 1400 MW 1500 MW Figure: Amout of Reserve Power physically connected to Synchronous Area

Sharing Example: FCR Sharing between Synchronous Areas Central Europe (CE) and Northern Europe (NE/Nordic) Initial dimensioning obligation without Exchange of Reserves (values arbitrary): CE NE 3000 MW 1500 MW Figure: Amout of Reserve Power physically connected to Synchronous Area

Sharing Example: FCR Sharing between Synchronous Areas Central Europe (CE) and Northern Europe (NE/Nordic) Now: Sharing of 100 MW between CE and NE, where Reserve Unit(s) are connected to CE Priority reserve access for providing SA Total Reserve Capacity of (CE+NE) is reduced CE 3000 MW NE 1400 MW 1500 MW Figure: Amout of Reserve Power physically connected to Synchronous Area

Sharing Example: Sharing between Synchronous Areas Central Europe (CE) and Northern Europe (NE/Nordic) Now: mutual Share of 100 MW between CE and NE CE 2900 MW 3000 MW NE 1400 MW 1500 MW Figure: Amout of Reserve Power physically connected to Synchronous Area

Limit on amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between SA proposal

Limits on the amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between SA Article 3 (Limits on the amount of exchange and sharing of FRR between SA) A reserve receiving TSO of a LFC block involved in the exchange of aFRR and mFRR between synchronous areas, where synchronous area of Continental Europe is the reserve receiving synchronous area, shall ensure that at least 50 % of its total combined FRR capacity resulting from the aFRR and mFRR dimensioning rules according to the Article 157 of the SO GL and before any reduction due to the sharing of aFRR and mFRR according to Article 157(2) of the SO GL remains located within its LFC block. Each TSO of a LFC block shall have the right to perform sharing of aFRR and mFRR with a LFC block in an adjacent synchronous area. In particular: where the synchronous area of Continental Europe is the reserve receiving synchronous area, the sharing of aFRR and mFRR is possible within the limits set by the aFRR and mFRR dimensioning rules in Article 157(1), Article 157(2)(j and k) and Article 158 of the SO GL. where synchronous area of Continental Europe is the reserve connecting synchronous area, no limits shall apply.

Limits on the amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between SA Explanations: The exchange and sharing of aFRR and mFRR between synchronous areas is a process CE TSOs do not foresee to be implemented, at least before the implementation of the corresponding balancing platform performing cross-border activation of aFRR and mFRR, according to EB GL. In this sense, TSOs at a first stage are not able to perform security assessment of such exchange or sharing. TSOs’ intention is not to block any kind of initiative in future, this is why the only rules considered for exchange or sharing of aFRR or mFRR, where receiving synchronous area is Continental Europe, are the same rules applied to LFC Blocks within the synchronous area Continental When synchronous area Continental Europe is the reserve connecting synchronous area, no limits are foreseen at this stage. This proposal relies on the fact that if such an exchange or sharing of aFRR and mFRR is going to be implemented in the future, specific security analysis studies will be needed in any case. Respective requirements and a corresponding notification process among TSOs as well as procedures for reservation of cross-border transmission capacities will have to be elaborated.

Conclusions

Conclusions The limits on amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between SA proposal respects the requirements set in articles 176(1) and 177(1) of the SO GL. The limits on amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between SA proposal responds to the objectives of SO GL pursuant to article 4(1) to ensure the conditions for maintaining a frequency quality level of all synchronous areas throughout the Union, by permitting exchange and sharing between SA under certain limits in order to avoid detrimental effect on each SA. The exchange and sharing of aFRR and mFRR between synchronous areas is a process CE TSOs do not foresee to be implemented, at least before the implementation of the corresponding balancing platform performing cross-border activation of aFRR and mFRR, according to EB GL. In this sense CE TSOs are not proposing a particular methodology to limit the amount of exchange or sharing of FRR between SA, other than the rules applied to LFC blocks for exchange or sharing of reserve within SA CA. Objective of CE TSO is not to forbid at this stage any future initiative of exchange or sharing of FRR between SA. Any future initiative will lead to operational assessment of exchange or sharing of FRR in due time, which might lead in future to amendment of the current proposal.

Q&A

Thanks for your attention!