How to proceed with MC for STAR forward upgrades?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plastic Scintillator Option for DB a simulation study by Maxim Gonchar, Yury Gornushkin and Dmitry Naumov JINR, Dubna, Russia Collaboration Meeting January.
Advertisements

Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
TJR 11/03/2003Slide 1 g4beamline A “Swiss Army Knife” for Geant4 Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
Monte-Carlo simulations and reconstruction for 12-degree ep-elastic Luminosity Monitor A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
Problem Statement Give a formal Problem statement showing the input / output; objective (e.g. minimizing computational cost or other relevant metrics)
Simulation of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for the Neutrino Factory Malcolm Ellis & Alan Bross Fermilab International Scoping Study Meeting KEK,
US CMS Phase 2 R&D Discussion 30-July-2013 “Phase 2 muon R&D” J. Hauser, UCLA  Add redundancy (power) to trigger where most needed  First and innermost.
Simulation of RPC avalanche signal for a Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
ALICE Simulation Framework Ivana Hrivnacova 1 and Andreas Morsch 2 1 NPI ASCR, Rez, Czech Republic 2 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland For the ALICE Collaboration.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
RICH SIMULATION USING GEANT4 S.EASO, RAL OBJECTIVES OF THE SIMULATION. CURRENT STATUS AND PLANS. INTEGRATION WITH LHCb SOFTWARE. SUMMARY.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
Simulation of GOSSIP/GridPix Nominal Detector, and GOSSIP in ATLAS.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group 28 July 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Guido Haefeli CHIPP Workshop on Detector R&D Geneva, June 2008 R&D at LPHE/EPFL: SiPM and DAQ electronics.
G. BrunoOffline week - February Comparison between test- beam data and the SPD simulations in Aliroot G. Bruno, R. Santoro Outline:  strategy of.
Bayes Theorem The most likely value of x derived from this posterior pdf therefore represents our inverse solution. Our knowledge contained in is explicitly.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
SiD Snowmass 05 Jaros1 Optimizing SiD getting from here….……………….to there SiD Concept/Snowmass August 16, 2005 John Jaros.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
M. Deveaux, CBM-Collaboration-Meeting, 25 – 28. Feb 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Considerations on the material budget of the CBM Micro Vertex Detector. Outline:
Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.
1 Software tools in Asia Akiya Miyamoto KEK 18-March-2005 Simulation and Reconstruction Session LCWS2005 Representing acfa-sim-j activity M.C.Chang 1,K.Fujii.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
Mokka, main guidelines and future P. Mora de Freitas Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole polytechnique - France Linear collider Workshop 2004, Paris.
Software Tools for Layout Optimization (Fermilab) Software Tools for Layout Optimization Harry Cheung (Fermilab) For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Working.
FCC-hh HCAL software goals Ana Henriques (thanks for Clement Helsens, Carlos Solans input)
RICH Simulation in LHCb LHC Detector Simulation Workshop S.Easo, RAL, On behalf of LHCb–RICH group.
SPHENIX EMCAL R&D Craig Woody BNL sPHENIX Design Study Meeting September 7, 2011.
LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project RCT/CTP7 Readout Isobel Ojalvo, U. Wisconsin Level-1 Trigger Meeting June 4, June 2015, Isobel Ojalvo Trigger Meeting:
Development of a Data-Based Fission Fragment Generator using the Geant4 Framework FISSION FRAGMENT GENERATOR Idaho State UniversityBrycen Wendt.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Introduction to FCC Software FCC Istanbul 11 March, 2016 Alice Robson (CERN/UNIGE) on behalf of / with thanks to the FCC software group.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana Dec 7, 2007 Mini WS, SLAC Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Simulations for SuperBelle SuperB computing.
MONTE CARLO TRANSPORT SIMULATION Panda Computing Week 2012, Torino.
Goals and requirements 1 st flexible geometry version Next geometry version development Conclusions and outlook A realistic and flexible VTX geometry in.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
STAR Upgrade Workshop Dec 13-14, UCLA Organizing Committee: Xin Dong (LBNL), Carl Gagliardi (TAMU), Huan Zhong Huang (UCLA), Ernst Sichtermann (LBNL),
Shower Fractal Dimensional Analysis at PFA Oriented Calorimeter
PhD thesis: Simulation & Reconstruction for the PANDA Barrel DIRC Official name: Open charm analysis tools Supervisor: Prof. Klaus Peters Maria Patsyuk.
Focusing Aerogel RICH Optimization A.Yu.Barnyakov, M.Yu.Barnyakov, V.S.Bobrovnikov, A.R.Buzykaev, V.V.Gulevich, S.A.Kononov, E.A.Kravchenko, A.P.Onuchin.
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Felix Sefkow DESY LDC at Vienna November 17, 2005
Status of the PandaRoot simulation of the Forward RICH
Muon stopping target optimization
Physics with the HFT prototype?
SuperB EMC Computing Foreseen activities and software/computing needs
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
… continue with realistic particle
RICH detector for CLAS12 … continue to explore feasibility of proximity focusing RICH in LTCC sector(s) INFN-Rome and ISS CLAS12-RICH Working Group Meeting.
R&D for SciFi calorimeters and STAR forward instrumentation upgrades.
Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum
PIXEL Slow Simulation Status Report
Dual readout calorimeter for CepC
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Use of GEANT4 in CMS The OSCAR Project
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Dr. Arslan Ornek MATHEMATICAL MODELS
Presentation transcript:

How to proceed with MC for STAR forward upgrades?

Geometry (from decadal plan): FSC FGT Extension Forward Tracking PID

How to proceed? Put oversimplified models for every detector (for example, ignore all mechanical details), run MC and try to optimize. Faster to implement, but will results be credible Or, include to best of our knowledge details, may be start with overkill parameters in terms of resolutions, granularities for future optimization. More work, but should provide more reliable results. Some sort of combined scheme.

Questions for slide 2: What minimal configuration is required to do physics simulations? What must be in the geometry file (details) and what can be omitted (assuming needed information will be accessible in geant output somehow)?

FGT Extension (example): Six additional GEM discs. Required input: dimensions, positions, pixels size. What degree of details should be in the description (foil thickness, gas thickness, mechanical support, readout)? Can existing FGT geometry be simply reused with shift/spread along Z? Or, something simple can be implemented? Who will collect all required information? Who will put geometry in place?

PID and Forward Tracking: PID, low-mass RICH, what model to put in? Forward Tracking, same questions as for FGT extension; dimensions, positions, pixel size. What level of details (technology) to include? Is simple sensitive pixels (yes/no for charge particles) is enough? Should we worry about albedo (mechanical details)? Etc… Who will put conceptual requirements? Who will put models in geometry description?

Forward Spaghetti Calorimeter: (see Jay’s slides) From stand alone MC no optimization yet, require more work, more people should be involved. However, current parameters (granularity and resolution) may be an overkill already. Proceed with implementation of current model? UCLA will provide all known details about hardware.

FMS, FHC. FMS, detailed description exists? FHC – same question, put simplified model, or put all know details. (Can we take care of collecting all info about FHC?)