Surprise! The Report You Weren’t Expecting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to manage your advisor (and one day, how to manage your student.
Advertisements

Underprepared Students What to do when the student you are working with is unprepared or underprepared.
JOB APPLICATION PROCESS
Your Performance Review
How to create great SMART Goals
Manager Training Deck: Equip Managers to Conduct Effective Pay Conversations Customization Notes: Please note this deck is intended for you to customize.
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
How to be a successful college student
Exam Preparation Caleigh Minshall Learning Strategies Outreach Coordinator Queen’s University.
The Direct Method Hansjürg Perino Andrea Bossard, Philipp Christen
Citadel Training Model for 2C
Workshop for ART mentors
Team Leader Training Diving In
Team Leader Training The Director’s
Team Leader Training The Dead Weight
Team Leader Training Days Booked Solid
Team Leader Training The G3 Briefing
The Poorly Written Report
Managing Salespeople In A Recession
Performance Feedback Training
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Establishing a Good Working Relationship with Faculty
Team Leader Training Dan’s Twin Brother Cam

Truck Happy Researcher
Team Leader Training Dealing With Sponsors
Team Leader Training The Chief’s Briefing
Team Leader Training I Got The Job!
Learning Objective Action: Unit Training Management (UTM)
Team Leader Training The Shipped Out Report
Delegating a New Project
Team Leader Training Working the System
Project Development Team
Fountain of Negativity
Team Leader Training The Blue Flu
Researchers Butting Heads
Designing a Research Package
Gotta Love Bureaucracy
Team Leader Training What Should I Do First?
Academic scenarios.
Team Leader Training Angry Captains
Instructional Learning Cycle:
The Data Hungry Contractor
Team Leader Training The Newbie
Team Leader Training Assigning Projects
Organization Leadership Skill Area
Team Leader Training The CG’s Summary…
Team Leader Training ARI Bashing Officer
The Fabricating Team Leader
Partnered or Group Projects
DETAILED PLANNING.
Supervisor Safety for Leaders
Peer mentor training Session 1
IEP Scenario Ms. Smith is holding an IEP meeting for her student, John. John has Down’s Syndrome and has good days and bad days. Ms. Smith is concerned.
Where’s NSMH? To infinity and beyond
Team Leader Training The Forwarded
Making it Real for Young Carers
Leading is About the Environment You Create
Dr. Rob Hasker SE 3800 Note 9 Reviews.
Human Resources Management: Module 3 Setting Performance Goals
QA Reviews Lecture # 6.
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
New country and Varied Cultures
Clear Creek Amana High School
Project Management.
B1-B2 Unit Three Lesson 1B Recreation survey.
B1-B2 Unit Three Lesson 1B Recreation survey.
Teacher ONLY slide Slides 2 – 6 Recap from the previous lesson
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

Surprise! The Report You Weren’t Expecting Team Leader Training Surprise! The Report You Weren’t Expecting Normal slide navigation has been disabled in order to ensure this training works properly. Macros must be enabled to complete training.

Surprise! The Report You Weren’t Expecting You have a fairly new and talented researcher on your team. Just out of graduate school, she is up on the latest research on distributed learning and has the most recent stat analysis experience. In order to help develop the researcher’s skills, and because you have a hot new assignment you plan on giving to the lead researcher who originally collected the data on a distributed learning project, you ask her to go off on her own to conduct the data analysis and produce a draft report. When the draft report comes in some weeks later, it is not at all what you expected. The analyses that were performed in support of the report were executed correctly, but they didn’t address what you consider to be the key hypotheses of interest to the military and those originally approved for the project.

Question & Answer Session Q1. What should you have done differently (if anything) to prepare the researcher to handle this assignment well?

Question & Answer Session Q2. How do you rectify the situation now? What do you ask of the researcher, if anything? What do you tell her?

Lessons Learned, Slide 1 of 4 You are tempted to just run the additional analyses and make the changes to the document yourself. Certainly this would get the project moving along more quickly. Plus this would preserve your very positive relationship with your researcher. After all, she seems to be learning quickly and you seem to get along well. You are a bit worried about rocking the boat. However, after some thought you decide that while it may be uncomfortable, this is a good developmental opportunity for your researcher. You bring the researcher in and explain specifically that while the analyses performed might be of academic interest, a different set of analyses would be more compelling to the Army and better fits ARI’s role. You ask the researcher to complete the additional analyses, giving specific suggestions, and to rework the draft of the report accordingly. Additionally, you set up some progress update meetings and outline your expectations for each meeting. You also are clear to say that you should have provided better guidance and asked for feedback on progress, which would have gone a long way to ensuring a better product the first time around.

Lessons Learned, Slide 2 of 4 Researchers need increasing amounts of autonomy over time to go forward on their own in order to grow within ARI. There is always a balance between excessive and insufficient oversight into a researcher’s activities. In this case, allowing the researcher autonomy was probably a good idea. However, better communication regarding expectations was needed early on. In retrospect, you did not give enough guidance or oversight. You should have explicitly communicated with the researcher to ensure she understood the perspective of the Army. This type of perspective taking is an important skill to develop in new people. In addition, you should have clearly communicated the hypotheses that were to be tested and the intent of the original research and analysis plan. It was a good move to work out a plan for the rework of this project and to put in place regular status update points to ensure things stay on track.

Lessons Learned, Slide 3 of 4 Perhaps you missed an opportunity to support collaboration between your new researcher and the researcher who originally collected the data but whom you had to move to another more pressing assignment. If there is time and you believe peer instruction/mentoring can be useful in a situation, don’t hesitate to use that resource. If due to pressing requirements you can’t involve the original researcher with the new employee from the beginning of this change in assignment, then don’t. You must play the role of mentor and be prepared to answer the new researcher’s questions. It isn’t fair to the original researcher to ‘after the fact’ involve him or her in the problem you created by not giving good guidance to initiate this change in lead. It was also a very good thing that you took responsibility for your own errors. By admitting that you dropped the ball on setting expectations and performance management, you set the tone that people should take responsibility for their work, both good and bad.

Lessons Learned, Slide 4 of 4 Look for developmental opportunities for your researchers, even if they are at times somewhat risky. Take responsibility for your own shortcomings and your team’s performance. Look for opportunities to support collaboration and peer mentoring. Learn how to ‘grease the skids’ for success, not only what you can do but what you can ensure others do in support. Teach subordinates when and how they need to advise you of change or requests for change from your original agreement with them regarding a task or project. It takes time for anyone to be able to succeed from little guidance where they can rely solely on a shared mental model or their understanding of ‘commander’s intent.’ Themes Accepting Responsibility; Developing Subordinates; Setting Expectations