collaborating with non- collaborators
Pollyanna PIXTON President, Accelinnova 801. 209. 0195 Forbes blog: blog.forbes.com/pollyannapixton/ blog: pollyannapixton.com t: @pollyannapixton Pollyanna PIXTON 2
Outline Who they are What makes them tick Your intentions and risks Tools
think of a non-collaborator you struggle with
what type is your non- collaborator: Leader Team member Another team A process
why don’t they collaborate? Leadership Role why don’t they collaborate? Fortune, March 23, 2009, interview of Jim Collins 6
lack of collaboration skills
… don’t know how
Trust … lack of trust 9
why people don’t collaborate… lack of collaboration skills fear
fear of losing control 11
fear of someone else taking credit 12
fear of failure
fear why people don’t collaborate… ‘it’s all about me’ lack of collaboration skills fear ‘it’s all about me’
self-centered
passive aggressive
wants power and control
personal agendas 18
must win
what this looks like…
withholds information to elevate importance to organization
is superior to others
sabotages others in effort to look better
always wants fingers in anything under the spotlight
fear your non-collaborator? ‘it’s all about me’ lack of collaboration skills fear ‘it’s all about me’
assess the system where your non-collaborator works 26
your non-collaborator’s focus? …their motivators? 27
your non-collaborator define success? how does your non-collaborator define success? 28
their fears? their ‘hot buttons’
any ‘hidden agendas’?
what are your risks?
can you risk: Handle being fired? Find another job as good or better within three months? Handle your career being derailed in this organization? Deal with public humiliation? Deal with any undeserved, negative labels? Survive without your mentors? Let someone else take the credit for your ideas and accomplishments?
recall successful risks taken 33
dealing with non-collaborators
have three people in the collaboration
find some common ground
Collaboration Tips share information be transparent
Collaboration Tips give data before people need it
find an influencer to influence your non-collaborator
speak so you can be heard 40
practice a forward going approach
bring solutions not just problems
high trust equals low command and control… 43
Trust/Ownership Model Failure No One Cares Energy & Innovation Team Trusted Leader Freed How do we get here? Leadership & Business Process Command & Control Team Does as Instructed Leader is Bottleneck Conflict Team Demotivated Wasted Effort Control Low Team/Individual Ownership High
where is your non-collaborator? 45
Trust-Ownership Model Abdication and Failure Innovation and Delivery We want to get here. Leadership & Business Process Micro-Management Conflict & Low Productivity Control Low Team/Individual Ownership High
Trust-Ownership Model Abdication and Failure Innovation and Delivery Leadership & Business Process Micro-Management Conflict Lower Productivity Control Low Team/Individual Ownership High
Appreciative Inquiry Problem Solving: Appreciative Inquiry: Identify the Problem Analyze the Causes Plan the Actions Basic Assumption: An organization is a problem to be solved. Appreciative Inquiry: Value What Is Envision What Can Be Discuss Next Steps Basic Assumption: An organization and the people know the possibility. “Fall Forward !” You learn more from how you recover from a mistake than how you got there. 48
Appreciative Inquiry Appreciative Inquiry Appreciative Orientation Problem-Solving Orientation CURRENT STATE PAST FUTURE ANALYZE & FILL THE GAP DISCOVER & REALIZE POSSIBILITIES QUESTIONS QUESTIONS What’s Wrong? What Happened? Who’s to Blame? How Do We Fix It? What’s Working? Where’s the Passion? What’s Possible? How Do We Achieve It? 49
Trust-Ownership Model Abdication and Failure Innovation and Delivery Leadership & Business Process Micro-Management Conflict Lower Productivity Control Low Team/Individual Ownership High
understand why they micro-manage
build a cube together 52 52
check in regularly
can you build trust? 54
Trust-Ownership Model Abdication and Failure Innovation and Delivery Leadership & Business Process Micro-Management Conflict Lower Productivity Control Low Team/Individual Ownership High
the “passive” non-collaborator
fear lack of understanding cultural differing goals the “passive” non-collaborator fear lack of understanding cultural differing goals
what are they passionate about? 58
what’s holding them back?
advocate for them to pursue their area of passion
“passive aggressive” non- collaborator
“passive aggressive” non- collaborator competitive lack of respect self preservation personal agenda
don’t engage in a power struggle
wrap them in process
make them step into their responsibility and make it the only possible step
don’t let them dodge accountability by saying you don’t have the authority
make them commit in public
Team Confidence take the ‘fun’ out of being dysfunctional 68
Obstructionists find something you agree on, no matter what
how do they want to solve the rest Find something you agree on, no matter how small Ask how they want to solve the rest Bring real data and lots of it
don’t let them be leaders
can a non-collaborator ever collaborate?
or …
work around
Trustworthiness reflect don’t react 75
“I’ll get back to you on that.” 76
don’t take it personally 77
leave the room 78
when all else fails…
remove or isolate the non-collaborator
protect the team
maybe it’s time to move on….
remember the non-collaborator you struggle with
your next steps…
summary 85
Outline Who they are What makes them tick Your intentions and risks Tools
Learn More
88 88
www.synerzip.com Jill Hoersten Jill.hoersten@synerzip.com 469.374.0500 89
Synerzip in a Nutshell Software product development partner for small/mid-sized technology companies Exclusive focus on small/mid-sized technology companies, typically venture-backed companies in growth phase By definition, all Synerzip work is the IP of its respective clients Deep experience in full SDLC – design, dev, QA/testing, deployment Dedicated team of high caliber software professionals for each client Seamlessly extends client’s local team offering full transparency Stable teams with very low turn-over NOT just “staff augmentation, but provide full management support Actually reduces risk of development/delivery Experienced team – uses appropriate level of engineering discipline Practices Agile development – responsive yet disciplined Reduces cost – dual-site team, 50% cost advantage Offers long-term flexibility – allows (facilitates) taking offshore team captive – aka “BOT” option
Synerzip Clients 91 91
Next Webinar Hadoop Vs Snowflake Snowflake Complimentary Webinar: Thursday, May 12, 2016 @ Noon CST Presented by: Saqib Mustafa Director, Product Marketing Snowflake
Connect with Synerzip Jill Hoersten Jill.hoersten@synerzip.com linkedin.com/company/synerzip facebook.com/Synerzip Jill Hoersten Jill.hoersten@synerzip.com 469.374.0500 93 93