Drugs & Driving: What now and what next?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Driving skill is measurably impaired by text-messaging. Writing text messages creates a significantly greater impairment than reading text messages, but.
Advertisements

CRICOS No J Deterring Drug Drivers: A Study into the Initial Impact of Oral Random Roadside Drug Testing in Queensland Professor Jeremy Davey ICADTS.
First Annual Virginia Distracted Driving Summit David S. Zuby Chief Research Officer September 19, 2013 Richmond, Virginia.
Presentation to JOC Transport & Communications 16 April 2015 Fintan Towey - DTTaS.
Postmarketing Risk Assessment of Drug Products Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Texting While Driving -- Another Kind of Impairment.
Traffic Safety Impacts of Digital Roadside Advertising in Alabama and Florida Virginia Sisiopiku, UAB K. Haleem, M. Islam, A. Gan, P. Alluri, A. Sullivan,
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
CRICOS No J Road Safety in Queensland: Successes and challenges Professor Barry Watson Road Safety Decade of Action: Queensland Launch – 11 May 2011.
Personal Factors That Affect Driving. Personal Factors Include: Alcohol, Drugs, and Fatigue.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA Research on Impaired Driving Heidi Coleman Chief, Behavioral Research NHTSA Office of Behavioral Safety.
November TRB 2012 DRUID session Drug Driving Enforcement Marjan Hagenzieker and Sjoerd Houwing
DUID DETECTION THE PRELIMINARY ROADSIDE DRUG TEST SYSTEM WITH ORAL FLUID (SALIVA)
Investigating Changes in Fatal- Crash-Involved Drivers’ Cannabinoid Prevalence after Passage of Medical Marijuana Laws G. Vanine Guenzburger Scott V. Masten.
1 Slide 1 of 12 Unsafe Acts POV SAFETY S top T hink O bserve P lan P roceed Safely Be a risk manager…. Think Safety!!!
Senior Drivers in Ontario Ontario Ministry of Transportation TRB 2004 Human Factors Workshop January 11, 2004.
Human Factors in Transportation Arnold G. Konheim U.S. Department of Transportation November 13, 2008.
Case-control study Chihaya Koriyama August 17 (Lecture 1)
Traffic Operational Command Unit Chief Superintendent David Snelling.
2020 VISION: DRIVING ROAD SAFETY FORWARD Drink and Drugs Road Safety Presentation - Post Primary.
1 Research methods and models of driver behavior studies.
Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 (1999) 617–623 Dave Lamble *, Tatu Kauranen, Matti Laakso, Heikki Summala Cognitive load and detection thresholds in.
Cannabinoid Concentrations Detected in Fatal Road Traffic Collision Victims Compared with a Population of Other Post Mortem Cases R. Andrews, K.G. Murphy,
March 2016 Advancing Drugged Driving Data at the State Level: Synthesis of Barriers and Expert Panel Recommendations.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
National Mobile Police Service High Risk Drivers! Odd Reidar Humlegård National Mobile Police Service.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Heidi Coleman Chief, Behavioral Research, NHTSA Office of Behavioral Safety Research Maryland.
The Influence of Social and Preventive Advertisement Educating the Behavior of Road Users Povilas Narbutas Deputy head of Traffic safety division.
Measures of disease frequency Simon Thornley. Measures of Effect and Disease Frequency Aims – To define and describe the uses of common epidemiological.
Screening Tests and Safety Interventions for Older Drivers Chris Hatherly.
YOUTH and Road Safety in Europe
#YDF2017.
Road Safety Research Office Ministry of Transportation of Ontario
Marijuana Surveillance
Acute Sleep Deprivation and Risk of Motor Vehicle Crash Involvement
Driving, Mobility and Laws
Poly-substance Impaired Drivers
YEARS POLICY REPORT OVERVIEW young Europeans Acting for Road Safety
Matched Case-Control Study
Pedestrian Safety.
Transportation Safety & Distracted Driving
Marijuana Use: No Longer Down in the Weeds
The Rx Impaired Driver: Strengthening Your Case
Safer Road Users Road Safety GB Joining the Dots Conference 2017
Staff Family Day: understanding safe road use
Understanding safe road use
Don’t Text While Driving !
2014 Ontario Roadside Alcohol and Drug Survey
Learning to drive: Does structured education make for safer drivers?
Drug-Impaired Driving in the Age of Legalization
Prevalence of Distracted Driving
CANNABIS AND CANNABINOIDS: THE CONUNDRUM
Lecture 1: Fundamentals of epidemiologic study design and analysis
Texting While Driving -- Another Kind of Impairment
Stanford Chihuri, MPH Interaction of Marijuana and Alcohol on Fatal Motor Vehicle Crash Risk: A Case-Control Study Stanford.
Cannabis and driving: regulations, drug testing and (future) science
Effects of Oncoming Vehicle Size on Overtaking Judgments
AAA Drugged Driving Summit│ January 26, 2015 │ Tampa, FL
DRINKING AND DRIVING.
TUGS Jason Higuchi && Julia Yefimenko && Raudel mayorga
Youth Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana
MS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISTRACTED DRIVING IN MISSISSIPPI 2011
Drug trends: The Vermont perspective
An In-depth Examination of Driver Fatalities Involving Drugs
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
Texas A&M Transportation Institute Safe-D Project AVID Slides
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
Effects of an Aftermarket Crash Avoidance System on Warning Rates and Driver Acceptance in Urban and Rural Environments ADTSEA 2019 Burlington VT July.
Impaired Driving in Canada Motor Vehicle Safety, Transport Canada
Presentation transcript:

Drugs & Driving: What now and what next? Road Safety Research Office Ministry of Transportation of Ontario CARSP Conference 2016

What is the situation? 2013 collision data: 64 road users killed by drivers who had used drugs

What is the situation? 2013 collision data: 64 road users killed by drivers who had used drugs 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs*

What is the situation? 2013 collision data: 64 road users killed by drivers who had used drugs 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs* 2014 roadside survey data: 10.5% of sampled drivers were drug-positive

What do we know? There is existing technology for detecting drug presence at roadside. Oral Fluid Screening Devices

What do we know? There is existing technology for detecting drug presence at roadside. Oral Fluid Screening Devices There is an existing test battery for detecting impairment at roadside. Standardized Field Sobriety Test

What don’t we know? Despite having methods to test for drug presence and drug impairment, presence and impairment is not a one-to-one relationship.

Marijuana has impairing effects. (per lab & simulator studies) Attention Reaction time Distance perception Speed variability Car following Lane positioning

Effect estimates of marijuana on collision risk are mixed (per epidemiology studies). Differences in biological samples

Effect estimates of marijuana on collision risk are mixed (per epidemiology studies). Differences in biological samples Confounding factors, e.g., age, sex

Effect estimates of marijuana on collision risk are mixed (per epidemiology studies). Differences in biological samples Confounding factors, e.g., age, sex Misclassification of exposure

Effect estimates of marijuana on collision risk are mixed (per epidemiology studies). Differences in biological samples Confounding factors, e.g., age, sex Misclassification of exposure Specific populations

What are we doing about this? Calculating an Ontario-specific estimate of collision risk from marijuana. Different places, different usage habits?

What are we doing about this? Calculating an Ontario-specific estimate of collision risk from marijuana. Different places, different usage habits? Mediated by “driver profile”? E.g., collision history, conviction history

HOW are we doing this? Recall from earlier slide: 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs* 2014 roadside survey data: 10.5% of sampled drivers were drug-positive

Update 2013 coroner data to 2014 Recall: 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs* 2014 roadside survey data: 10.5% of sampled drivers were drug-positive Update 2013 coroner data to 2014

Adjust for confounders, e.g., age, sex Recall: 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs* 2014 roadside survey data: 10.5% of sampled drivers were drug-positive Update 2013 coroner data to 2014 Adjust for confounders, e.g., age, sex

Adjust for confounders, e.g., age, sex Recall: 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs* 2014 roadside survey data: 10.5% of sampled drivers were drug-positive Update 2013 coroner data to 2014 Adjust for confounders, e.g., age, sex Adjust thresholds to reflect recent usage

Adjust for confounders Adjust thresholds to reflect recent usage Recall: 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs* 2014 roadside survey data: 10.5% of sampled drivers were drug-positive Update 2013 coroner data to 2014 Adjust for confounders Adjust thresholds to reflect recent usage Isolate the “marijuana-only” cases

Adjust for confounders Adjust thresholds to reflect recent usage Recall: 2013 coroner data: 39% of drivers killed tested positive for drugs* 2014 roadside survey data: 10.5% of sampled drivers were drug-positive Update 2013 coroner data to 2014 Adjust for confounders Adjust thresholds to reflect recent usage Isolate the “marijuana-only” cases Match for time of day, day of week, etc.

Next Steps Monitor literature for emerging evidence on drugs and driving, particularly cannabis and driving. Continue with our in-house collision risk estimate, with results by year end.

Tracey Ma Team Lead, Special Projects Road Safety Research Office Ministry of Transportation tracey.ma@ontario.ca