Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Which role for economics in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive ? Arnaud Courtecuisse Artois-Picardie Water Agency Miedzyzdroje, 23.
Advertisements

WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EEA 2017 State of European waters
Principles and Key Issues
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Working Group A ECOSTAT Ecological Status 7th Meeting Stresa, Lago Maggiore, Italy
IC network selection process
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
State of Implementation of CEA in Germany
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
WFD and Hydromorphology - 4/5 June 2007, Berlin, Germany -
Proposed CIS Workshop on WFD Economic Issues
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting May 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD Team.
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Technical review of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU concerning MSFD criteria for assessing GES Work flow and progress 20/21 October th WG GES.
Water Directors’ Meeting Common Implementation Strategy
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD.
Outline of the control approach
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting May 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD Team.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Outcome of 2^ Seminar of the WG 2.7 Roma, January
INTEGRATED TESTING OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS IN PILOT RIVER BASINS
Progress SOE –drafting group
Discussion of the Draft Questionnaire IMPRESS Kick-off Meeting
Wetlands and the Water Framework Directive
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Meeting of Water Directors Future Work Programme of the CIS
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
Meeting of Water Directors 2/3 December 2004
EEAs assessments of the status of Europe’s waters
Working together Marc Thauront Brussels 28 January 2009.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Common Understanding Way forward
Pilot River Basin exercise.
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Workshop on Biodiversity and Water
WFD and Agriculture Activity under the CIS 2005/2006 Work Programme
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
EU Water Framework Directive
Integrated Testing in Pilot River Basins
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
Part I.
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
IMPRESS Guidance and Policy Summary Water Directors Copenhagen, 21-22nd November 2002 Working Group leaders: Volker Mohaupt, Umwelt Bundes Amt Isobel.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
EIONET and EUROWATERNET Common Implementation Strategy
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Guidance document on the identification of water bodies
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Water Director's Meeting December 2013, Vilnius DG Environment
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Presentation transcript:

Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales EU Common Implementation Strategy Project 2.1- Pressures & Impacts (IMPRESS) Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales

Background Article 5 & Annex II- Characterisation of RBD Identification of significant human pressures on surface and groundwaters Assessment of likely impact on water status WFD Deadline December 2004, reviewed Dec 2013 Project is jointly managed by UK and Germany Project Managers: Volker Mohaupt - Federal Environment Agency, Germany Dave Foster - Environment Agency for England & Wales Participation - 14 Member States, plus Norway, EEA, Joint Research Centre, EUROSTAT and 5 stakeholder groups

IMPRESS CONTACTS

Aims Develop common understanding of most effective approach to identification of pressures and assessment of potential impact of these pressures Identify appropriate tools to assist with this analysis, and where further development is needed Develop and disseminate guidance on the above

Progress Initial scoping meeting as part of 6th Technical Workshop between UK Environment Agencies & German Lander Working Group on Water (LAWA), Belfast, June 2001 Attended by 8 MS and EUROSTAT Output- Background paper on “Identification of significant human pressures and impacts” Sets out key principles to be addressed in guidance. Development of draft questionnaire for MS collation of current “best practice”, generic sources of information currently available tools

Next Steps (1) Formal Kick-off meeting Tuesday 23rd October, Brussels discussion of background papers, introduce questionnaire to MS, agree updated workplan, develop links to other working groups. Questionnaires to completed by end 2001

Next Steps (2) First working group workshop: March 2002 Draft guidance document developed: March - August 2002 Second workshop: September 2002 (draft guidance discussed) Final guidance produced: October 2002 - December 2002 Guidance published: December 2002

Next Steps (3) Working Arrangements Before Workshop 1 (Oct 2001 - March 2002) Complete Questionnaire (MS), Analyse results (project managers), Start to develop “outline guidance” on key issues (working group members, with structure from project managers, plus input from questionnaire returns), At Workshop 2 (March 2002) Discussion / development of outline guidance Discussion of questionnaire analysis & implications Agreement of scope of Guidance Document

Potential Topics for Core Groups Common Understanding (e.g. significance) Scale Issues Estimating Impacts Sources of Data / Information Availability of Tools Baseline and trends

How Working Group members volunteer to develop papers on particular topics Other WG members to assist in drafting P Managers to identify the scope Questionnaire returns to inform the process

Next Steps (4) Before Workshop 2 (March 2002 - Sept 2002) Detailed development of key elements of guidance (working group members) Development of outline Guidance Document (project managers) Case Studies? At Workshop 2 (September 2002) Agreement of final guidance document After Workshop 2 (Sept 2002 - Dec 2002) Production of final guidance document

Links to Other Groups Identification of significant human pressures and their potential impacts on water status links several other aspects of the WFD, and hence other CIS projects Strong links have been identified with: Designation of Heavily Modified Waterbodies (Project 2.2) Reference conditions for inland surface waters (Project 2.3) Typology / classification of transitional & coastal waters (Project 2.4) Intercalibration (Project 2.5) - attended kick-off Economic analysis (Project 2.6) - attended last working group Development of a common GIS (Project 3.1) There are also potential links with most other CIS projects

Key Issues for Guidance Defining “pressures” and “what is significant” use of thresholds etc. Scale of analysis what is a waterbody? Identification of key categories of pressures Identification of sources of pressure information Linking pressures to impacts Assessment of baseline and trends in pressures Appropriate tools / models etc. To be discussed further later this morning

Working Arrangements - Issues For Discussion / Agreement Membership of working group Project Objectives Linkages to other working groups Working methods How to go about developing the various elements of the guidance Who and How, and by When Use of Case Studies Timescales Key milestones Dates of working group meetings / workshops