Purpose of MAC calibration test cases

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1192r5 Submission MAC calibration results comparison Date: Authors: Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)Slide 1 October 2014.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
HE Trigger Frame Format
Doc.: IEEE /1192r1 Submission September 2014 MAC calibration results comparison Date: Authors: Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)Slide 1.
MAC calibration results comparison
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
MAC Simulator Calibration Results
Demand on Roaming for WUR
Discussion of WUR Packets Design
Data Rate Selection for Wake-up Receiver
Header Compression Date: Authors: May 2012 Month Year
MAC Calibration results
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
TG ax Consideration of Spatial Reuse
Demand of Being Woken Up While Moving Follow-up
Power Save Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
MAC Calibration Results
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
Comments on Relay Date: Authors: Month Year
Simulation Results of Box5
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Consideration on WUR packet Design
Simulation Results of Box5
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
IEEE 802 omniRAN R9c Reference Point
Wake Up Response mode to WUR frame
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Simulation Results for Box5
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
Multicast Scenarios for MAC Calibration
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Enabling Frame Body Capture Effect
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Discussion of WUR Packets Design
Synchronization Requirements
Flexible Group ID Allocation
Multi-WID Addressed WUR Frame
Power Save Calibration
Power Save Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD
EHT Feature Discussion
Simulation Results of Box5
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Block Addressed WUR Frame
TD Control field with Response indication in WUR frame
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
Proposed Resolution to CID2114
Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
MAC Calibration Results
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
TG ax DSC derived CCAeff and OBSS_PD
On the Need for an ai Annex
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
LC MAC submission – follow up
IEEE 802 RAN Recommended Practice ToC Proposal
EHT Multi-AP Feature Discussion
Multi-WID Addressed WUR Frame
LC MAC submission – follow up
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Presentation transcript:

Purpose of MAC calibration test cases April 2013 doc.: IEEE 802.11- July 2014 Purpose of MAC calibration test cases Date: 2014-July Authors: Name Affiliation Address Email Bo Sun ZTE sun.bo1@zte.com.cn Ke Yao ke.yao@zte.com.cn Kaiying Lv lv.kaiying@zte.com.cn Yonggang Fang yfang@ztetx.com Bo Sun, ZTE Bo Sun, ZTE

July 2014 Abstract This proposal suggests to clarify the purpose of each of the tests defined in “Scenarios for calibration of MAC simulator” in [1]. Bo Sun, ZTE

July 2014 Background Several MAC calibration test cases have been defined in “Scenarios for calibration of MAC simulator” in [1] Test 1a: MAC overhead w/out RTS/CTS Test 1b: MAC overhead w RTS/CTS Test 2a: Deferral Test 1 Test 2b: Deferral Test 2 Test 4: NAV deferral Problem: there’s no clear definition of the purpose of each test. It may lead to misunderstanding of the purpose of the test with its title and assumption. We suggest to add purpose description for each test case. Bo Sun, ZTE

Proposed purpose for Test 1a July 2014 Proposed purpose for Test 1a Purpose for test1a: the test case is designed to verify whether the simulator can correctly handle the basic frame exchange procedure, including DIFS+backoff procedure and A-MPDU+SIFS+BA sequence. Bo Sun, ZTE

Proposed purpose for Test 1b July 2014 Proposed purpose for Test 1b Purpose for test1b: the test case is designed to further verify whether the simulator can correctly handle the frame exchange procedure with RTS/CTS protection based on test1a. Bo Sun, ZTE

Proposed purpose for Test 2a July 2014 Proposed purpose for Test 2a Purpose for test2a: the test case is designed to verify whether the simulator can correctly handle deferral procedure after collision happens without hidden nodes. Bo Sun, ZTE

Proposed purpose for Test 2b July 2014 Proposed purpose for Test 2b Purpose for test2b: the test case is designed to verify whether the simulator can correctly handle deferral procedure after collision happens with the existing of hidden nodes. Bo Sun, ZTE

Proposed purpose for Test 4 July 2014 Proposed purpose for Test 4 Purpose for test4: the test case is designed to verify whether the simulator can correctly handle the NAV setting and NAV deferral procedure. Bo Sun, ZTE

July 2014 Straw Poll 1 Do you agree to add purpose description for each of the test cases defined in “Scenarios for calibration of MAC simulator” in [1]? Bo Sun, ZTE

July 2014 Straw Poll 2 Do you agree to add purpose description as in slide 4 to 8 to “Scenarios for calibration of MAC simulator” in [1]? Bo Sun, ZTE

Reference [1] 11-14-0621-04-00ax-simulation-scenarios July 2014 Reference [1] 11-14-0621-04-00ax-simulation-scenarios [2] 11-14-0600-00-00ax-MAC-simulator-calibration Bo Sun, ZTE