Work Package 3 Progress at 2.5 years

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning breeding programs for impact
Advertisements

Fall 2014 HORT6033 Molecular Plant Breeding INSTRUCTOR: AINONG SHI HORT6033 web site:
MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION Individuals carrying the trait of interest are selected based on a marker which is linked to the trait and not on the trait itself.
Potato Mapping / QTLs Amir Moarefi VCR
Frary et al. Advanced Backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum x L. pennellii cross and identification of possible orthologs in the Solanaceae.
Bulk method Bulk is an extension of the pedigree method. In contrast to pedigree, early generations are grown as bulk populations w/o selection. The last.
Cameron Peace, Washington State University
Association Mapping as a Breeding Strategy
Qualitative and Quantitative traits
Coming soon to a genetics lab near you! NBCEC Beef Genetic Workshop Clay Center, NE March 27, 2004 Marker adjusted EPDs.
Genomic Tools for Oat Improvement
Believing in MAGIC: Validation of a novel experimental breeding design Emma Huang, Ph.D. Biometrics on the Lake December 2, 2009.
Breeding and Genetics Tools Dr. Brent Hulke Research Geneticist.
Backcross Breeding.
Update on the NSA SNP project Dr. Venkatramana Pedagaraju – Molecular Breeding and Genomics Technology Manager Dr. Brent Hulke -- Research Geneticist.
Development of markers associated with traits of agronomic importance in winter oats Catherine Howarth, Alexander Cowan, Irene Griffiths and Tim Langdon.
Plant of the day! Pebble plants, Lithops, dwarf xerophytes Aizoaceae
Chapter 7: Molecular markers in breeding
Towards utilization of genome sequence information for pigeonpea improvement By ICAR institutes, SAUs and ICRISAT.
ARC Biotechnology Platform: Sequencing for Game Genomics Dr Jasper Rees
The Community of Practices “Concept applied to rice production in the Mekong Region: Quick conversion of popular rice varieties with emphasis on drought,
Natural Variation in Arabidopsis ecotypes. Using natural variation to understand diversity Correlation of phenotype with environment (selective pressure?)
Molecular marker data and their impact on gene bank management Chris Richards NCGRP, Fort Collins, CO Curator Workshop, Atlanta Georgia.
APPLICATION OF MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF LATVIAN CROP PLANTS Nils Rostoks University of Latvia Vienošanās Nr. 2009/0218/1DP/ /09/APIA/VIAA/099.
1 International Consultation on Pro-poor Jatropha Development, Rome, Apr 08HY Genetic Markers for Jatropha Biodiversity Evaluation and Breeding Introduction.
Genotyping and association analysis of Gossypium hirsutum lines for resistance in Reniform Nematodes Megha V. Sharma*, Stella Kantartzi, David Weaver,
Dr. Scott Sebastian, Research Fellow, Pioneer Hi-Bred International Plant Breeding Seminar at University of California Davis Accelerated Yield.
Experimental Design and Data Structure Supplement to Lecture 8 Fall
Quantitative Genetics
Gramene: Interactions with NSF Project on Molecular and Functional Diversity in the Maize Genome Maize PIs (Doebley, Buckler, Fulton, Gaut, Goodman, Holland,
QTL Associated with Maize Kernel Traits among Illinois High Oil × B73 Backcross-Derived Lines By J.J. Wassom, J.C. Wong, and T.R. Rocheford University.
Gene Bank Biodiversity for Wheat Prebreeding
A Quantitative Overview to Gene Expression Profiling in Animal Genetics Armidale Animal Breeding Summer Course, UNE, Feb Final Remarks Genetical.
Association Mapping in European Winter Wheat
Genetic mapping and QTL analysis - JoinMap and QTLNetwork -
What gains can we expect from Genetics?
Malting quality is not really a single trait, but a combination of traits, each of which is complex in nature. Most of the components of malting.
May 4, What is an allele?. Genotype: genetics of trait (what alleles?) Homozygous: two copies of the same allele –Homozygous dominant (BB) –Homozygous.
Fall HORT6033 Molecular Plant Breeding
Plant Genetics: TA INTRO
Moukoumbi, Y. D1. , R. Yunus2, N. Yao3, M. Gedil1, L. Omoigui1 and O
Breeding Efforts towards Yield and Fiber Quality Improvement in Cotton
Plant Breeding Approach
The is a Critical Resource for Developing and Refining Trait-Predictive DNA Tests Cameron Peace, Daniel Edge-Garza, Terry Rowland, Paul Sandefur.
Comparative mapping of the Oregon Wolfe Barley using doubled haploid lines derived from female and male gametes L. Cistue, A. Cuesta-Marcos, S. Chao, B.
Cotton Breeding and Genetics Initiative
Tyr Wiesner-Hanks December 12, 2014
WP2: Pest and diseases report 30 September April 2017
Backcross Breeding.
Feedback from WP2 discussions
Germplasm Issues Chapter 3. Variation: Type, Origin, and Scale
Centre of Plant Structural and Functional Genomics
WP1 Progress for 2.5 years Primary investment outcome: Increased Matooke and Mchare breeding pipeline performance by a 15-20%, higher production of seeds.
Genes, Traits & Alleles.
Brief description of results on genomic selection of CIMMYT maize in Africa (Yoseph Beyene et al.) Several populations each with 200 F2 x tester individuals.
1-What matooke delivered the NARITAs?
The student is expected to: 6A identify components of DNA, and describe how information for specifying the traits of an organism is carried in the DNA.
WP3 Harmonization of terminologies: use of ITC codes whenever possible
In these studies, expression levels are viewed as quantitative traits, and gene expression phenotypes are mapped to particular genomic loci by combining.
Linkage analysis and genetic mapping
Barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare)
More Genetics Bio 12.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
What should be discussed
Evan G. Williams, Johan Auwerx  Cell 
Mendelian Genetics Ch. 6.
Cancer as a Complex Genetic Trait
M. D. Jasani, J. H. Kamdar, A. K. Maurya and S. K. Bera
M-H Pinard-van der Laan
Presentation transcript:

Work Package 3 Progress at 2.5 years Brigitte Uwimana IITA Uganda

Primary outcome To develop molecular tools for selection in banana breeding through: QTL analysis for: Fusarium wilt (R1 and SR4) Burrowing nematodes (Radopholus similis) Burrowing weevils Development of predictive models for Genomic Selection for: Yield Other agronomic traits

Molecular tools: step by step Develop populations: Mapping populations (QTL analysis) Training population (phase 1 for GS) Phenotype Mapping populations Training population Genotype Phenotypic + genotypic data Linkage maps and QTL mapping Development of predictive models Year 1 and 2 Year 2, 3 and 4 Year 4 Year 4 and 5

Progress with Phenotyping Population Target number of genotypes Foc R1 Site Parents Phenotyped/being phenotyped Phenotyping to be completed by Kasaska x Borneo 200 Kawanda TxT 62% March 2018 Monyet x Kokopo 180 TxS 71% Nov 2017 Calcutta 4 x Calcutta 4   55% Feb 2018 Paliama x Borneo Arusha ? 10% Malaccensis x Malaccensis (UQ)

Progress with Phenotyping Foc SR4: building on previous research At the University of Queensland and University of Malaya UQ: Fine mapping of the resistance region: from 33 to 15 candidate genes Testing resistance markers in other lines Defining resistance in the Malaccensis x Malaccensis population and compare with resistance to R1 in the same population UM: population was lost, crosses going on, availing genotypic and transcriptomic resources

Progress with Phenotyping Population Target number of genotypes Weevil Site Parents Phenotyped/being phenotyped Phenotyping to be completed by Kasaska x Borneo 200 Kawanda SxR 62% March 2018 Monyet x Kokopo 180 Sendusu RxS 23%

Progress with Phenotyping Population Target number of genotypes Nematode Site Parents Phenotyped/being phenotyped Phenotyping to be completed by Kasaska x Borneo 200 Sendusu RxS 95% Nov 2017 Calcutta 4 x Zebrina GF 180 65%

Progress with Phenotyping Site   Training population (since 2013) Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Flowering Harvest Sendusu: low input 100% 98% 93% 87% 72% 65% Sendusu: optimum input 96% 82% Mbarara 78% 68% 54% 22% 11% 1% Sendudu: EET lines (200) 10% -

Molecular tools: step by step Develop populations: Mapping populations (QTL analysis) Training population (phase 1 for GS) Phenotype Mapping populations Training population Genotype Phenotypic + genotypic data Linkage maps and QTL mapping Development of predictive models Year 1 and 2 Year 2, 3 and 4 Year 4 Year 4 and 5

Progress with Genotyping Mapping populations: Genotyping going on with 19 SSR markers at IEB to check for pollination mistakes Complete for Kasaska x Borneo: Pollination errors Kasaska available different from the Kasaska in the population Borneo is the only known parent The population is a mixture of BC1 (backcrossed to Borneo) and F1 x F1 Mapping to be done without a linkage map Genotyping with 20 ISSR and 1 IRAP from UM (Monyet x Kokopo) Dense SNP markers to be provided this year (Chip)

Progress with Genotyping Training population for GS: 307 lines: 2x (11%), 3x (85%), and 4x (4%) Genotyped using GBS 10,807 SNPs scored bi-allelically 5,579 SNPs scored per ploidy level Predictive models using data from 2 fields for 2 cycles Prediction power ranging from 20% to 68% Nyine M., B. Uwimana, R. Swennen, M. Batte, A. Brown, P. Christelová, E. Hřibová, J. Lorenzen, J. Doležel (Submitted) Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population, PLOS ONE. Nyine M., B. Uwimana, J. Lorenzen, R. Swennen, E. Hřibová, H. Vanrespaille, M. Batte, A. Brown, V. Akech, J. Doležel (in preparation) Genomic selection in a polyploid crop: the impact of genotype by environment interaction and allelic dosage on predictive ability of genomic selection models in banana, PLOS Genetics.  

Capacity building 4 PhD students: 3 MSc students: SLU UM SU IEB KU Leuven Makerere University

Challenges Mapping populations with pollination mistakes More than one population per trait Screening for Foc in Arusha: pathogen is silent Communication

Way forward Phenotyping to be completed by March 2018 Genotyping by June 2018 Preliminary QTL mapping by September 2018 Predictive models to be enriched with data from Mbarara and EET Select genotypes for validation