Speech and Language Processing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite State Automata. A very simple and intuitive formalism suitable for certain tasks A bit like a flow chart, but can be used for both recognition.
Advertisements

CS Morphological Parsing CS Parsing Taking a surface input and analyzing its components and underlying structure Morphological parsing:
Natural Language Processing Lecture 3—9/3/2013 Jim Martin.
Computational Morphology. Morphology S.Ananiadou2 Outline What is morphology? –Word structure –Types of morphological operation – Levels of affixation.
1 Morphology September 2009 Lecture #4. 2 What is Morphology? The study of how words are composed of morphemes (the smallest meaning-bearing units of.
Morphological Analysis Chapter 3. Morphology Morpheme = "minimal meaning-bearing unit in a language" Morphology handles the formation of words by using.
1 Morphology September 4, 2012 Lecture #3. 2 What is Morphology? The study of how words are composed of morphemes (the smallest meaning-bearing units.
Finite-State Transducers Shallow Processing Techniques for NLP Ling570 October 10, 2011.
Morphology Chapter 7 Prepared by Alaa Al Mohammadi.
BİL711 Natural Language Processing1 Morphology Morphology is the study of the way words are built from smaller meaningful units called morphemes. We can.
6/2/2015CPSC503 Winter CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics Lecture 2 Giuseppe Carenini.
6/10/2015CPSC503 Winter CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics Lecture 3 Giuseppe Carenini.
LIN3022 Natural Language Processing Lecture 3 Albert Gatt 1LIN3022 Natural Language Processing.
Computational language: week 9 Finish finite state machines FSA’s for modelling word structure Declarative language models knowledge representation and.
CSCI 5832 Natural Language Processing Lecture 5 Jim Martin.
1 Morphological analysis LING 570 Fei Xia Week 4: 10/15/07 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A.
Morphology See Harald Trost “Morphology”. Chapter 2 of R Mitkov (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics, Oxford (2004): OUP D Jurafsky &
Morphological analysis
CS 4705 Morphology: Words and their Parts CS 4705 Julia Hirschberg.
Parsing SLP Chapter 13. 7/2/2015 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin 2 Outline  Parsing with CFGs  Bottom-up, top-down  CKY parsing.
Regular Expressions and Automata Chapter 2. Regular Expressions Standard notation for characterizing text sequences Used in all kinds of text processing.
Finite State Transducers The machine model we will study for morphological parsing is called the finite state transducer (FST) An FST has two tapes –input.
CS 4705 Morphology: Words and their Parts CS 4705 Julia Hirschberg.
Introduction to English Morphology Finite State Transducers
Morphology and Finite-State Transducers. Why this chapter? Hunting for singular or plural of the word ‘woodchunks’ was easy, isn’t it? Lets consider words.
Morphology (CS ) By Mugdha Bapat Under the guidance of Prof. Pushpak Bhattacharyya.
Finite-state automata 3 Morphology Day 14 LING Computational Linguistics Harry Howard Tulane University.
Lemmatization Tagging LELA /20 Lemmatization Basic form of annotation involving identification of underlying lemmas (lexemes) of the words in.
Morphology: Words and their Parts CS 4705 Slides adapted from Jurafsky, Martin Hirschberg and Dorr.
Lecture 3, 7/27/2005Natural Language Processing1 CS60057 Speech &Natural Language Processing Autumn 2005 Lecture 4 28 July 2005.
October 2006Advanced Topics in NLP1 CSA3050: NLP Algorithms Finite State Transducers for Morphological Parsing.
Lecture 1, 7/21/2005Natural Language Processing1 CS60057 Speech &Natural Language Processing Autumn 2007 Lecture4 1 August 2007.
Morphological Recognition We take each sub-lexicon of each stem class and we expand each arc (e.g. the reg-noun arc) with all the morphemes that make up.
Introduction Morphology is the study of the way words are built from smaller units: morphemes un-believe-able-ly Two broad classes of morphemes: stems.
LING 388: Language and Computers Sandiway Fong Lecture 22: 11/10.
10/8/2015CPSC503 Winter CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics Lecture 2 Giuseppe Carenini.
Session 11 Morphology and Finite State Transducers Introduction to Speech Natural and Language Processing (KOM422 ) Credits: 3(3-0)
Finite State Transducers for Morphological Parsing
Morphology A Closer Look at Words By: Shaswar Kamal Mahmud.
Lecture 1, 7/21/2005Natural Language Processing1 CS60057 Speech &Natural Language Processing Autumn 2007 Lecture 3 27 July 2007.
Morphological Analysis Chapter 3. Morphology Morpheme = "minimal meaning-bearing unit in a language" Morphology handles the formation of words by using.
Chapter III morphology by WJQ. Morphology Morphology refers to the study of the internal structure of words, and the rules by which words are formed.
Natural Language Processing Lecture 2—1/15/2015 Susan W. Brown.
CSA3050: Natural Language Algorithms Finite State Devices.
Natural Language Processing Chapter 2 : Morphology.
October 2007Natural Language Processing1 CSA3050: Natural Language Algorithms Words and Finite State Machinery.
1/11/2016CPSC503 Winter CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics Lecture 2 Giuseppe Carenini.
October 2004CSA3050 NLP Algorithms1 CSA3050: Natural Language Algorithms Morphological Parsing.
Two Level Morphology Alexander Fraser & Liane Guillou CIS, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Computational Morphology.
CIS, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Computational Morphology
CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics
Lecture 7 Summary Survey of English morphology
Morphology Morphology Morphology Dr. Amal AlSaikhan Morphology.
Speech and Language Processing
عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد
CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics
Morphology: Parsing Words
CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics
Morphology: Words and their Parts
Natural Language Processing
CSCI 5832 Natural Language Processing
CSCI 5832 Natural Language Processing
LING 138/238 SYMBSYS 138 Intro to Computer Speech and Language Processing Dan Jurafsky 11/24/2018 LING 138/238 Autumn 2004.
By Mugdha Bapat Under the guidance of Prof. Pushpak Bhattacharyya
CSC NLP - Regex, Finite State Automata
CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics
CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics
CPSC 503 Computational Linguistics
Morphological Parsing
CSCI 5832 Natural Language Processing
Presentation transcript:

Speech and Language Processing Lecture 3 Chapter 3 of SLP

Today English Morphology Finite-State Transducers 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Words Finite-state methods are particularly useful in dealing with a lexicon Many devices, most with limited memory, need access to large lists of words And they need to perform fairly sophisticated tasks with those lists So we’ll first talk about some facts about words and then come back to computational methods 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

English Morphology Morphology is the study of the ways that words are built up from smaller meaningful units called morphemes We can usefully divide morphemes into two classes Stems: The core meaning-bearing units Affixes: Bits and pieces that adhere to stems to change their meanings and grammatical functions 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

English Morphology We can further divide morphology up into two broad classes Inflectional Derivational 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Word Classes By word class, we have in mind familiar notions like noun and verb We’ll go into the gory details in Chapter 5 Right now we’re concerned with word classes because the way that stems and affixes combine is based to a large degree on the word class of the stem 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Inflectional Morphology Inflectional morphology concerns the combination of stems and affixes where the resulting word: Has the same word class as the original Serves a grammatical/semantic purpose that is Different from the original But is nevertheless transparently related to the original 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Nouns and Verbs in English Nouns are simple Markers for plural and possessive Verbs are only slightly more complex Markers appropriate to the tense of the verb 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Regulars and Irregulars It is a little complicated by the fact that some words misbehave (refuse to follow the rules) Mouse/mice, goose/geese, ox/oxen Go/went, fly/flew The terms regular and irregular are used to refer to words that follow the rules and those that don’t 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Regular and Irregular Verbs Regulars… Walk, walks, walking, walked, walked Irregulars Eat, eats, eating, ate, eaten Catch, catches, catching, caught, caught Cut, cuts, cutting, cut, cut 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Inflectional Morphology So inflectional morphology in English is fairly straightforward But is complicated by the fact that are irregularities 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Derivational Morphology Derivational morphology is the messy stuff that no one ever taught you. Quasi-systematicity Irregular meaning change Changes of word class 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Derivational Examples Verbs and Adjectives to Nouns -ation computerize computerization -ee appoint appointee -er kill killer -ness fuzzy fuzziness 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Derivational Examples Nouns and Verbs to Adjectives -al computation computational -able embrace embraceable -less clue clueless 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Example: Compute Many paths are possible… Start with compute Computer -> computerize -> computerization Computer -> computerize -> computerizable But not all paths/operations are equally good (allowable?) Clue Clue -> *clueable 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Morpholgy and FSAs We’d like to use the machinery provided by FSAs to capture these facts about morphology Accept strings that are in the language Reject strings that are not And do so in a way that doesn’t require us to in effect list all the words in the language 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Start Simple Regular singular nouns are ok Regular plural nouns have an -s on the end Irregulars are ok as is 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Simple Rules 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Now Plug in the Words 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Derivational Rules If everything is an accept state how do things ever get rejected? 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Parsing/Generation vs. Recognition We can now run strings through these machines to recognize strings in the language But recognition is usually not quite what we need Often if we find some string in the language we might like to assign a structure to it (parsing) Or we might have some structure and we want to produce a surface form for it (production/generation) Example From “cats” to “cat +N +PL” 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Finite State Transducers The simple story Add another tape Add extra symbols to the transitions On one tape we read “cats”, on the other we write “cat +N +PL” 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

FSTs 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Applications The kind of parsing we’re talking about is normally called morphological analysis It can either be An important stand-alone component of many applications (spelling correction, information retrieval) Or simply a link in a chain of further linguistic analysis 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Transitions c:c a:a t:t +N: ε +PL:s c:c means read a c on one tape and write a c on the other +N:ε means read a +N symbol on one tape and write nothing on the other +PL:s means read +PL and write an s 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Typical Uses Typically, we’ll read from one tape using the first symbol on the machine transitions (just as in a simple FSA). And we’ll write to the second tape using the other symbols on the transitions. 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Ambiguity Recall that in non-deterministic recognition multiple paths through a machine may lead to an accept state. Didn’t matter which path was actually traversed In FSTs the path to an accept state does matter since different paths represent different parses and different outputs will result 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Ambiguity What’s the right parse (segmentation) for Unionizable Union-ize-able Un-ion-ize-able Each represents a valid path through the derivational morphology machine. 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Ambiguity There are a number of ways to deal with this problem Simply take the first output found Find all the possible outputs (all paths) and return them all (without choosing) Bias the search so that only one or a few likely paths are explored 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

The Gory Details Of course, its not as easy as “cat +N +PL” <-> “cats” As we saw earlier there are geese, mice and oxen But there are also a whole host of spelling/pronunciation changes that go along with inflectional changes Cats vs Dogs Fox and Foxes 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Multi-Tape Machines To deal with these complications, we will add more tapes and use the output of one tape machine as the input to the next So to handle irregular spelling changes we’ll add intermediate tapes with intermediate symbols 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Multi-Level Tape Machines We use one machine to transduce between the lexical and the intermediate level, and another to handle the spelling changes to the surface tape 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Lexical to Intermediate Level 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Intermediate to Surface The add an “e” rule as in fox^s# <-> foxes# 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Foxes 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Note A key feature of this machine is that it doesn’t do anything to inputs to which it doesn’t apply. Meaning that they are written out unchanged to the output tape. 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Overall Scheme We now have one FST that has explicit information about the lexicon (actual words, their spelling, facts about word classes and regularity). Lexical level to intermediate forms We have a larger set of machines that capture orthographic/spelling rules. Intermediate forms to surface forms 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Overall Scheme 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Cascades This is an architecture that we’ll see again and again Overall processing is divided up into distinct rewrite steps The output of one layer serves as the input to the next The intermediate tapes may or may not wind up being useful in their own right 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Overall Plan 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Final Scheme 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Composition Create a set of new states that correspond to each pair of states from the original machines (New states are called (x,y), where x is a state from M1, and y is a state from M2) Create a new FST transition table for the new machine according to the following intuition… 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

Composition There should be a transition between two states in the new machine if it’s the case that the output for a transition from a state from M1, is the same as the input to a transition from M2 or… 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin

δ3((xa,ya), i:o) = (xb,yb) iff There exists c such that Composition δ3((xa,ya), i:o) = (xb,yb) iff There exists c such that δ1(xa, i:c) = xb AND δ2(ya, c:o) = yb 11/19/2018 Speech and Language Processing - Jurafsky and Martin