Technology Exploration Cloud Hosting at USGS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey WTF Core Test Sites Status and Plans WGISS #24, DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen/Munich, Germany October 15,
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #22 September 15, 2006 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #24 October 19, 2007 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
BEDI -Big Earth Data Initiative
Agile Infrastructure built on OpenStack Building The Next Generation Data Center with OpenStack John Griffith, Senior Software Engineer,
USGS Core Data Stream Report Session 7: Baseline Global Observation Scenario SDCG-7 Sydney, Australia March 4 th – 6 th 2015.
02/07/2001 EOSDIS Core System (ECS) COTS Lessons Learned Steve Fox
Next Generation Application Platform (NGAP) Andrew Mitchell WGISS-39 Tsukuba, Japan Monday, May 11,
Chapter-7 Introduction to Cloud Computing Cloud Computing.
Osama Shahid ( ) Vishal ( ) BSCS-5B
Global Data Flows Study SDCG-8, Session 6 Frank Martin Seifert (ESA); Gene Fosnight (USGS) 24 Sep 2015, Bonn.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Diving into the Data Pool with DAAC2Disk Kelly Lemig ERT, Inc., contractor to the U.S. Geological.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey June 22, 2009 Landsat Data Gap Readiness Plan Briefing to Landsat Science Team Rochester, New.
Implementing Library1Search (WebFeat) at the Goddard Library September 27, 2006 Kathleen McGlaughlin NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Library Zimmerman.
Cloud Computing 12/7/ Traditional Computing Hardware – Computers with CPU (hardware) – Storage (hard disk or other materials) – Software packages.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey John Faundeen October 9, 2011 Future Directions in Data Preservation ^ and Current.
FILE MANAGEMENT Computer Basics 1.3. FILE EXTENSIONS.txt.pdf.jpg.bmp.png.zip.wav.mp3.doc.docx.xls.xlsx.ppt.pptx.accdb.
Cloud Archive By: Kimberly Nolan. What it is?  The goal of a cloud archiving service is to provide a data storage (ex. Google drive and SkyDrive) as.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Archiving Geospatial Data John Faundeen, Archivist Presentation to Map & Geographic Information.
Incoming Themes for 2017 Frank Kelly, USGS
Lecture 6: Cloud Computing
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Cloud Computing Brandy Donahue ITEC 7445.
Chapter 6: Securing the Cloud
USGS EROS LCMAP System Status Briefing for CEOS
Platform as a Service (PaaS)
The Cloud Primer for Dynamics GP Customers
Future directions of CEOS WGCV: Incoming chair perspective
Use any Amazon S3 application with Azure Blob Storage
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Free Cloud Management Portal for Microsoft Azure Empowers Enterprise Users to Govern Their Cloud Spending and Optimize Cloud Usage and Planning MICROSOFT.
Future Data Architectures (FDA) Pilot Project Summary
Amazon Web Services Submitted By- Section - B Group - 4
Cloudification Sarah Christen 1/26/2016.
Andrew McCombs March 10th, 2011
Wonderware Online Cost-Effective SaaS Solution Powered by the Microsoft Azure Cloud Platform Delivers Industrial Insights to Users and OEMs MICROSOFT AZURE.
WGISS-43 USGS Agency Report Kristi Kline USGS EROS Center
Technology Exploration Cloud Hosting at USGS
Space Data Services Session 2: Space Data Country Outreach and Delivery Agenda Item #3 Brian Killough CEOS Systems Engineering Office (SEO) February 25,
Workgroup Technology Partners
Introduction to Enterprise Systems
Vembu SaaSBackup for Office 365
Cloud Migration What to Consider When Switching Providers NAME: SYED TARIQ SHAH “WAQIF” REG NO: K1S18MCS0021 SUB: CLUSTER AND CLOUD COMPUTING.
Status Report on ARD Usage
Landsat Program The World’s Most Sophisticated Optical Observatories of the Earth The World’s Model for International Collaboration in Earth Observation.
Future Data Architecture Cloud Hosting at USGS
Data Interoperability and User USGS User Management
Technology & Tools Used for Capacity Building at USGS
Land Imagery Data Architectures
Open Data Cubes Cloud Services Experiences and Lessons Learned
Future Data Architectures Big Data Workshop – April 2018
VIRTUALIZATION & CLOUD COMPUTING
ARD Needs and Plans for Thematic Pilots
CEOS Background & Mission
CloneManager® Helps Users Harness the Power of Microsoft Azure to Clone and Migrate Systems into the Cloud Cost-Effectively and Securely MICROSOFT AZURE.
Cloud Computing Cloud computing refers to “a model of computing that provides access to a shared pool of computing resources (computers, storage, applications,
Dell Data Protection | Rapid Recovery: Simple, Quick, Configurable, and Affordable Cloud-Based Backup, Retention, and Archiving Powered by Microsoft Azure.
SEO Report to WGISS Brian Killough CEOS Systems Engineering Office (SEO) WGISS-46 Meeting October 22, 2018.
FDA Topics Going Forward…???
Chris Lynnes with contributions from Katie Baynes NASA/GSFC
FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session
Agency Reports – USGS Jenn Lacey LSI-VC-5 Agenda Item #2 February 2018
The Software Solution June 27, 2013 Underwritten by:
CEOS ARD Strategy LSI-VC-7 S Ward, Feb 2019.
Revision PowerPoint By Nicole Davidson.
Status Report on the Open Data Cube and the use of ARD
Global Data Flows LSI-VC-7 S Ward, Feb 2019.
GEO-Amazon Cloud Credit Program and a Prototype Sentinel Data Pipeline
SEO Report to WGISS-47 Brian Killough
SEO Report to WGISS-48 Brian Killough
Presentation transcript:

Technology Exploration Cloud Hosting at USGS WGISS-44 Technology Exploration Cloud Hosting at USGS Kristi Kline USGS EROS Center U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Agenda Landsat in the Cloud Plan Re-cap of benefits/issues in the cloud specific to Earth Observation Data activities

Landsat in Amazon Web Services USGS is beginning a project to move access and processing of Landsat data to AWS 2-3 year effort to migrate activities Current Level-1 Collection 1 will be replicated this year New U.S. Analysis Ready Data (ARD) product will be available ASAP Plan to process globally a Level-2 suite (surface reflectance, top of atmosphere, brightness temp, pixel-based QA) WGISS-41 (March 14-18, 2016)

Potential for EO in the Cloud Access of Landsat data from cloud sources But which one(s)??? Google Amazon Microsoft IBM and now Oracle? Others? What type of services? Access and delivery Subsets of data (selected areas, bands, etc.) Processing

Advantages of Cloud Increased resources On-line disk space Faster data access Storage of results No need to download lots of data Processing resources Data and processing resources co-located – faster results Potential for less time to process results Potential for less costly processing – no need to buy dedicated resources

Advantage of Cloud Small projects and defined efforts bests served No need to purchases specific resources Pay only for what is needed Ability to “gear up/down” as needed for project needs Large project potential for improvements Processing large volumes of data would take less time Faster results

Issues with Cloud Cost of data egress Currently costs $$ to download data from most cloud providers Given desire to provide free data, this would be an issue for basic data like Landsat, Sentinel, etc. AWS will allow for free egress (they do this today) – not large volumes, but similar to average USGS users USGS is investigating large volume requirements No immediate change with current access – USGS intends to maintain free access

Issues with Cloud Provenance/integrity of data in the cloud Who put it in the cloud? USGS will own the data in AWS Who maintains the cloud holdings? USGS will maintain the AWS cloud holdings Was anything about the data changed? No. Not that users will see. Data will be stored in cloud optimized format (not tar/gzip) How is it managed? Will the data I need stay there? USGS will manage. Yes. Entire archive!

Issues with Cloud Potential procurement issues Multiple cloud providers Do you choose only one? What if NASA chooses one vendor, USGS chooses another, ESA chooses yet another? Do we gain the same benefits? Can we afford to put data in multiple clouds? How many is enough? US contracts are generally 5 years – moving from one vendor to a different is non-trivial Landsat data is currently provided for free (including cloud vendors) and is provided by several of them currently Pay-as-you-go could be a problem with unknown egress needs for distribution

Issues with Cloud Cloud systems still require high level of IT security as well as administration, engineering, software No investing in dedicated hardware resources, however… Still need to have many of the same staff supporting applications on cloud systems Does this impact archive plan? Is the data in the cloud a copy? Do you keep an archive copy somewhere else? USGS will maintain basic Mission Data as always Still investigating copy options What about products created by scientists in the cloud? TBD. This is likely agency specific in terms of how resulting information is managed

Issues with Cloud Cloud could complicate data management – especial if there is more than one provider Yes. Data management is TBD. Possibly will manage more than one copy in multiple locations.

Questions/Discussion