Update on and the Issue of Circularly-Polarized On-Axis Harmonics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schemes for generation of attosecond pulses in X-ray FELs E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov The potential for the development of XFEL beyond.
Advertisements

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
1 Enhancements to the Linac Coherent Light Source.
The BESSY Soft X-Ray SASE FEL (Free Electron Laser)
UCLA The X-ray Free-electron Laser: Exploring Matter at the angstrom- femtosecond Space and Time Scales C. Pellegrini UCLA/SLAC 2C. Pellegrini, August.
Spontaneous Radiation at LCLS Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04 Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04.
SLAC XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing Workshop 1 Current status of the FERMI project (slides provided by Rene Bakker) Photoinjector laser system.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
Progress at the XFELs in Europe and Japan Hans-H. Braun, PSI 48 th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on Future Light Sources March 1-5, 2010 SLAC National.
W.S. Graves1 Seeding for Fully Coherent Beams William S. Graves MIT-Bates Presented at MIT x-ray laser user program review July 1, 2003.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Free Electron Lasers (II) Sincrotrone Trieste Enrico Allaria Advanced School on Synchrotron and Free Electron Laser Sources and their Multidisciplinary.
Free Electron Lasers (I)
W.S. Graves ASAC Review Sept 18-19, 2003 R&D at Bates William S. Graves MIT-Bates Laboratory Presentation to MIT X-ray laser Accelerator Science Advisory.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs R. P. Walker Diamond Light Source, UK ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5 th -9 th, 2012 Thomas Jefferson.
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
External Seeding Approaches for Next Generation Free Electron Lasers
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
UCLA Claudio Pellegrini UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy X-ray Free-electron Lasers Ultra-fast Dynamic Imaging of Matter II Ischia, Italy, 4/30-5/3/
LCLS-II: Accelerator Systems LCLS SAC Meeting P. Emma et al. April 23, 2010.
J. Wu March 06, 2012 ICFA-FLS 2012 Workshop Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA Tolerances for Seeded Free Electron Lasers FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC),
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
1 REPORT Simone Spampinati on behalf of the FERMI team.
X-band Based FEL proposal
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov FEL Seminar, DESY April 26, 2016 Reverse undulator tapering for polarization control at X-ray FELs.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Free Electron Laser Studies
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Eduard Prat / Sven Reiche :: Paul Scherrer Institute
LCLS-II: An upgrade for the LINAC Coherent Light Source
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Status and Interest of the X-ray FEL SINAP
A compact, soft X-ray FEL at KVI
Design of an ECHO-seeded FEL at nm wavelength
Challenges in Simulating EEHG
Gu Qiang For the project team
Paul Scherrer Institut
Linac optimisation for the New Light Source
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Self-seeding for the soft x-ray line in LCLS upgrade
TW FEL “Death-Ray“ Studies
WBS 5.0 LCLS Strategic Projects Division
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Challenges in Simulating EEHG
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Brief Introduction to (VUV/)Soft X-ray FELs
Design of an ECHO-seeded FEL at nm wavelength
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Enhanced Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Presentation transcript:

Update on FERMI@Elettra and the Issue of Circularly-Polarized On-Axis Harmonics W. Fawley for the FERMI Team Slides courtesy of S. Milton & Collaborators

The FERMI@Elettra Project FERMI@Elettra is a single-pass FEL user-facility, with output wavelengths of 100 to 20 nm (FEL-1) and 20 to 4 nm (FEL-2) ; total project cost ~ 130 M-Euros Major characteristics: 1.5 GeV, 50 Hz, 800 A, ~400 fs, 1.5 mm-mrad e-beam Seeded harmonic cascade (“HGHG”-like); 2 stages for FEL-2 High peak power (~GW), ultrashort (100 fs to 10 fs) output pulses Synchronization to external laser sources APPLE II-type undulators for both variable wavelength and polarization Advanced feedback and feed-forward systems to improve output stability Use of 3rd harmonic extends  range down to L-edges of magnetic materials Commissioning began in fall 2009… Gun to laser heater Sept.- Nov. 2009 [done] Laser heater and accel. to BC1 (diags) Feb.-Mar. 2010 [now!] BC1 and remaining linac summer 2010 Undulator installation early fall 2010  first light late 2010 FEL-1 begins user operations in early 2011, FEL-2 in late 2011 2

FEL-1 and FEL-2 Layouts // Winter 2009 Layout of FEL-1 Layout of FEL-2 Space exists for additional radiator undulators if needed or wanted. Possible upgrades later will consider use of EEHG, HHG schemes. 3

FERMI@Elettra Civil Construction Linac and Linac Extension Halls (completed) Undulator Hall early spring 2010 User Experimental Hall summer 2010 Electrical and Mechanical Plants 4

Linac, Undulator & Expt. Halls: Feb. 2010 Und. Hall 5

Undulator & Elec./Mech. Bldgs: Feb. 2010 6

Laser Heater Region: Feb. 2010 7

Emittance measurements @ 5MeV, 74 MeV Nov. ‘09 slit method measurements of the X- and Y-emittance varying the gun solenoid strength (@200pC charge) Quad Scan - 10Feb10 vertical beam size; 74 MeV Y-plane: Min. value of 1.08rad at 175 Amps X-plane: Min. value of 1.30rad at 165 Amps 8 Slide courtesy of M.Petronio, A.Lutman

FERMI Operational Wavelength Range FEL-1 FEL-2 3rd Harm. Slide from E. Allaria 9

Some Critical Issues for FEL-2 E-beam energies of 1.5 GeV needed for reasonable gain at 4 nm final radiator w reduced to 35 mm to help gain Incoherent energy spread is a “known unknown” (or “unknown known” ??? ) BC1 results in summer ‘10 should help settle an important beer bet FEL-2 will be first operational 2-stage harmonic upshift FEL can we go from ~200 nm to ~4 nm in 2 stages? final radiator deep in exp. gain regime output bandwidth sensitivity to quadratic chirp, e-beam imperfections <E>, timing jitter are important issues determining jitter in Pout Diagnostics below 20 nm get tougher and tougher…. Will pump probe synchronization work smoothly? 3rd harmonic emission critical for magnetic materials studies in 1-2 nm region

Issues Concerning Third Harmonic Generation in Pure Helical Undulators Linearly-polarized undulators with K ≥ 1 have odd harmonic, on-axis emission due to electron “figure-8” motion in x-z plane “Pure” helical undulators do not generate harmonic emission (h > 1) on axis Freund et al. (PRL 94, 074802) claimed coherent emission on-axis; disproved by Geloni et al. (NIM A, 581, 856), Allaria et al. (PRL 100, 174801) Off-axis emission exists for all h > 1; well-known effect in light sources But there is destructive interference of emission from non-zero sized coherent sources when viewed by off-axis observer: For large Fresnel numbers, this interference damps overall off-axis harmonic emission by > 2 orders of magnitude for h ≥ 2 Resultant emission is within a narrow angle centered about and a FWHM width (see Geloni et al.) Depending upon transverse coherent bunching parameters, this angle can be a factor of h smaller than the far-field opening angle for the FEL radiation at the fundamental wavelength

“Worse-Case” Estimate of Circularly-Polarized Harmonic Emission Off-axis emission from a purely helical undulator (destructive interference effects) Adapting Geloni et al.’s analysis for 2nd harmonic to high gain amplifier at saturation Rough analytic estimates suggest for h=3, another factor ~ (4 kwZR)-1 appears (in addition to using microbunching fraction for h=3) Fundamental Wavelength / Energy # photons/pulse fundamental Harmonic Wavelength / Energy # photons / pulse harmonic 3 nm 413 eV 4.2E+11 1.5 nm (h=2) 826 eV 1.7E+06 1 nm (h=3) 1240 eV 250 5 nm 248 eV 3.2E+12 2.5 nm (h=2) 496 eV 1.2E+08 1.33 nm (h=3) 744 eV 2E+04

Possible Means to Increase Circularly-Polarized 3rd Harmonic Emission Two schemes can be easily implemented into 2nd radiator of FEL-2 using existing APPLE-II design: BESSY (APPLE topology) has found that combining predominantly circular polarization together with a small linear component produces on-axis radiation output that is up to 90% circularly polarized Sequential cross-polarized undulators have been suggested by K.-J. Kim and others to produce a net on-axis harmonic component (e.g., for fixed gap, linearly polarized undulators as in the LCLS) There are other schemes to produce significant h=3 emission (for FERMI, in an “afterburner” configuration, using the final one or two undulator sections) biharmonic configuration where a moderate amount of 3rd harmonic B⊥ is added mechanically (e.g., pole-shaping) to the nominal fundamental B⊥ Modification of the “Figure-8” undulator scheme of Tanaka and Kitamura (NIM A, 365, 368 [1995]) by combining an interior, short period (λw =λ0w /3) circularly- polarized undulator emitting on-axis at its fundamental together with a separate “exterior”, longer period (λw =λ0w) linearly-polarized undulator which produces most of the necessary overall K for FEL resonance

Our friends are pulling for us!

Overall FERMI Schedule Project Operations “Shaded” areas merely underline the fact that there are many areas involved, some of which are phased to start earlier or later than other areas 15

Time dependent S2E simulations Time dependent simulations using the elegant2genesis file created from the elegant file. Easier simulation procedure, slightly reduction of high frequency noise. The present layout is used with 6 undulators in the final radiator. The 4.2nm case has been producing starting with 120MW of seed laser at 201.6 nm (70 fs FWHM long). About 120MW are produced at 16.8nm from RAD1(~40 fs FWHM long). At final output, more than 2GW are produced at 4.2nm from RAD2(~50 fs FWHM long). The FEL-2 bandwidth is a factor ~4 larger with respect to the one of a Gaussian pulse with the same FWHM. However the main spectral peak is comparable with the spectrum from a Gaussian with a FWHM of 28 fs. Slide From Allaria et al. MAC Dec. 09 16