Subrecipient Agreements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Literacy for Executives and Non-financial Staff Bonnie Janicki, Corporation for National and Community Service.
Advertisements

Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Award Close-out Procedures-an overview Review award documents Complete Reconciliation Sheet Budget Reconciliation Expense Reconciliation Oracle Balances.
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
1 Guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 By David G. Bullock, Partner Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subawards and Subcontracts Sponsored Projects Training Program October 17 th, 2011 Renee Hunt, Julie Macy & Dawn Pelkey.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
Subcontracts Subcontractor or Vendor How do you know?
JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
CReATE Presented by: Marcy Friedle, Grants Compliance Analyst.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Grant Financial Management Post Award Sponsored Projects Training Program1.
Subcontracting January 2015 Presented by: Derek Brown, OGRD Anke Moore, SPS.
Subrecipient Monitoring. A formal binding legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity A portion of your sponsored project's.
Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Single Audit Compliance Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Jackie Reese, Audit Unit.
Foundation Financial Services Post Award Nancy Gomez Post Award Analyst.
Highlights of Post Award Sponsored Project Administration July 11, 2007 Office of Research Training & Compliance.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
Establishing Subawards to External Collaborators A Step by Step Guide April 8, 2014 OSP Coffee Break.
Subawards and the Uniform Guidance Research Reps Meeting 17 March 2015.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
How Grant/Research Administrators and OSR Can Work Together Better.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Cost Sharing on Sponsored Awards Division of Financial Affairs OSP Roundtable October, 2015.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
TRAINING MODULE II: PART II SUBCONTRACTS AND SUBAWARDS Office of Contract and Grants The University of Colorado at Boulder February 16,
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subrecipient Monitoring
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
UNIFORM GUIDANCE: RESULTS AND BEST PRACTICES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
SUBCONTRACTS DEMYSTIFIED
Presented by Urmila Bajaj January 26, 2017
Uniform Guidance Discussion
2 CFR 200- aka Uniform Guidance.
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
Outgoing Subs Understanding Subawards and Subcontracts
Subrecipient Monitoring Audit
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Subrecipient Monitoring
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Sponsored Award Administration-Post
Account Monitoring and Reconciliation Can Reduce Cost Transfers
Outgoing Subawards Proposal Stage
We Got an award! What?! We have more to do?
Subawards Overview of Subawards-Federal Definition
Understanding a Subrecipient Agreement
Cfda nUMBER PUBLISHED 8/19/2019.
Office of Grants and Contracts Presenter: Stephanie Chandler-Thompson
Presentation transcript:

Subrecipient Agreements CLASP Presentation January 2018 Jeff Sullivan, Asst Controller ORACS

Agenda Required Oversight for Federal Awards DUNS/CFDA UR Business Process Flow Roles Potential Pitfalls Foreign v Domestic Public/Private/Single Audit/No Audit/etc. URFinancials Setup and Processing

Required Oversight – Uniform Guidance A pass-through (Prime) entity must: Identify the Award and Applicable Requirements (to the Sub) Evaluate Risk (of the Sub) Monitor Subrecipient Ensure Accountability of For-Profit Subrecipients

Identify the Award and Applicable Requirements Notify Sub they are in fact a Sub, including CFDA and FAIN of Prime AWD What, if any, requirements are imposed upon them via flowthrough What, if any, additional requirements are imposed from the Prime recipient Obtain DUNS number from Sub, if applicable

Evaluate Risk (of the Sub) Prior experience w Sub Results of Sub’s prior audits Personnel Turnover or System Changes Extent and Results of Federal awarding agency monitoring, if applicable

Monitor Subrecipient Review Financial and Programmatic Reports, as required Ensure that any compliance deficiencies identified through audit, on site review, or other means are resolved timely and appropriately Issue a management decision for audit findings pertaining to the Prime award passed through

Ensure Accountability of For-Profit Subrecipients For-Profit Subs are accountable to the Prime for the use of Federal funds provided 2 CFR 200 Part F is not applicable to For-Profit Subs, therefore the Prime is responsible for establishing requirements, as necessary The agreement must describe applicable compliance requirements and responsibility

DUNS/CFDA The Data Universal Numbering System, abbreviated as DUNS, is a proprietary system developed and regulated by Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) that assigns a unique numeric identifier, to a single business entity. It was introduced in 1963 to support D&B's credit reporting practice. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, abbreviated as CFDA, is a government-wide compendium of Federal programs, projects, services, and activities that provide assistance or benefits to the American public.

DUNS/CFDA (con’t) DUNS allows for tracking of the Sub, disclosure of possible prior sins either via credit report or Single Audit Reporting CFDA allows a Sub to report on what Federal funds are flowed through their organization, and if necessary, report on Each reverse disclosure is mandatory under Uniform Guidance

UR Business Process Flow Pre Agreement PI/Dept ORPA ORACS (upon req) Post Agreement PI/Dept ORACS ORPA (upon req)

Pre Agreement Roles PI/Dept ORPA Identify Sub and Qualify Expertise Determine/conclude reasonable budget Prepare Request for Subcontract Form Send Form to ORPA ORPA Prepare and Send Sub Profile Form Complete Risk Assessment Checklist Conclude on Risk Level of Sub Execute/Discard Agreement

Post Agreement Roles PI/Dept ORACS Review expenses reported v science performed Compare actual expense to budget Ensure expenses are within budget period Forward to ORACS Confirm terms or deliverables made prior to FINAL payment ORACS Review for PI Approval Review Accounting Coding (LA,SC) Review Budget Date Forward to AP Obtain Single Audit Certifications Annually Prepare Single Audit Findings Summary

Potential Pitfalls Misdiagnose Risk Keying Errors in Agreement Keying Errors in Payments (Amt -Budget Date) Approve excess expenses Misplaced Invoices Delinquent Invoices from Sub Overbilled and Subsequent Return of Funds Failure to aquire required data

Foreign v Domestic Domestic Foreign Many are subject to Single Audit Ease of Risk Assessment of Audited Fin Stats Listed in SAM.gov Foreign Rarely subject to Award Specific Audit Currency and Translation Issues Not listed in SAM.gov

Public/Private/Single Audit/No Audit/etc. Public Co and Private Owned, unlikely to have a Single Audit Private Owned, unlikely to have a Board of Directors (segregation of duties) Private Owned and Start Up, unlikely to have Financial and Compliance Experience Small Non-Profit, usually segregation of duties isssues and lack of financial expertise

URFinancials Setup Modified Total Direct Costs – MTDC $25,000 threshold Unique Award Line (GR) Current Federal incremental is 54% or $13,500 Total Direct Costs – TDC NO threshold Unique Award Line NOT NEEDED Usually run at less than Full Rates

URFinancials Processing Subcontract will identify GR510xxx If agreement is extended we do NOT NEED new GR, unless prime line is void of carryforward. If a new scope of work, then NEW PO#, and NEW GR and Award Line If Sub demands NEW PO#, NOT NEW scope of work, then edit existing GR name