Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Protection Rapid Assessment Tool
Advertisements

Group Games Lynne Hughes-Guy Ramesh Mehay. Aims of this Session Why Use Games How do you run a game? How do you build it into a programme? What types.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Data Analysis Session 5.1. Session 12: 1 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
DATE : 3 rd to 4 th June 2013 Location : Thida Baptist Church (Near Su Taung Pyae Pagoda), Myitkyina Time : 9.30 to 5.00 PM CCCM : CAMP PROFILING ENUMARATOR.
Planning and Conducting Data Collection – Community and Focus Group Discussions Session 3.1 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Breakout Sessions in Wimba Annette Gaskins HCPL. What’s a “breakout session? (Answer in chat) Brainstorm:
Interactive Learning PHCL 482 Seminar 2. Interactive Teaching Involves facilitator and learners Encourage and expect learners to participate Use questions.
Congress: House of Representatives Congress is in session.
Developing the Assessment Work Plan and Data Collection Tools Session 3.3 Session 11: 1 Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments.
Steps in Planning a Usability Test Determine Who We Want To Test Determine What We Want to Test Determine Our Test Metrics Write or Choose our Scenario.
Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.
CACHE Level 2 Intro to Early Years Education © Hodder & Stoughton Limited CACHE LEVEL 2 INTRODUCTION TO EARLY YEARS EDUCATION AND CARE Unit 5 Understand.
Training Activities 1. As a group, spend 15 minutes creating a poster that includes: A slogan about your preference group Images illustrating the strengths.
\ ICME Interdisciplinary Case Management Experience.
Mock interviews Mock interview activity
Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment
COM 350 Course Experience Tradition / snaptutorial.com
Laboratorio di lingua inglese 3
Classroom Skill Building
What is the Rapid Needs Assessment tool?
Leadership in a humanitarian context
WebQuest: Where you design your own Space Exploration Mission
SSP4000 Introduction to the Research Process Wk1: Module Introduction
Key responses – Hygiene Promotion Introduction to HP and participation
Laboratorio di lingua inglese 3
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Laboratorio di lingua inglese 3
Designing Performance Assessments
Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment
Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment
K-2 Breakout/ Session 3 Parallel Tasks.
Wikispaces for Teachers A Guide to Using Them in Your Classroom
Agenda 9/2: Fill out profile Introductions Syllabus/Procedures Debrief
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Analysis: In Real Life
Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment
Competency Based Learning and Development
Classroom Skill Building
Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment
Classroom Skill Building
CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment
A Framework for education needs assessments: INEE Minimum Standards
Nuts and Bolts of Peer Coaching
Scottish Improvement Skills
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Chicago Public Schools
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Module 2 Nuts and Bolts of Peer Coaching Peer Coach Training.
Engaging with leaders Thursday 8th March 2011 Tim Heywood
Introduction to the Section - Part B
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Near misses: It won’t happen here
Exercises for managers to run with teams
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Session 1, Planning Skills Instruction
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
Activity Manager Activity Leaders Team Leaders Peer Leaders Followers.
Laboratorio di lingua inglese V
Analysis of Performance
S.E.E.D. 1 Seeking Educational Equity and Diversity
IRAQ Assessment Working Group: Challenges, Priorities and Capacity
Interdisciplinary Case Management Experience
Human Subjects Research
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Exercise draft for training cluster/partners
Experts by Experience Group Observations.
Slide Deck: 01.
Presentation transcript:

Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment Simulation Exercise Session 5 3 January 2017

Purpose The mini-simulation exercise allows you to: Familiarise yourself with the tool Practice choosing different key informants and CGDs Practice the debriefing, synthesizing 3 forms into 1 Identify and trouble-shoot problems in the debrief process Discuss mitigation tactics for debrief complications

Instructions Everyone will receive a scenario and a role in Arabic. There will be three groups: FSC Group WASH Group Child Protection Group In each group, we will have the following roles: Assessment Managers/Team Leaders Enumerators / Data Collectors Key Informants Community representatives You will have 5 minutes to read the materials and assign roles and responsibilities. Identify who are Assessment Managers or Team Leaders in the room Pick three and ask them to sit in opposite corners of the room Allocate FSC, WASH, CP to each of them Select 9-12 Assuming there between 27 to 35 people the following breakdown of roles should happen: WASH FOOD CHILD PROTECTION

1. Familiarization with scenario Following a meeting with the Humanitarian Coordinator and the Humanitarian Country Team, OCHA and UNICEF share with you the following update on the situation on the ground. Provide a copy of the scenarios in Arabic (or English) to all participants. Arabic speaker reads the scenario out loud, while participants follow the information on their respective copies.

2. Form assessment teams Are there assessment managers or assessment team leaders in the room? Has anyone interviewed communities before? Has anyone selected/interviewed Key Informants before? Identify 3 assessment managers for the three groups - FSC, WASH and CP Give each assessment managers four copies of blank forms of their respective sector – FSC, WASH, CP and ask them to sit in opposite corners of the room. Identify 12 members of communities. Ask them to join one of the assessment managers. Make sure there are 4 community members per assessment manager. Identify 3 (up to 6 if group is big) key informants. Ask them to join one of the groups. Make sure that each group has at least one KI. Rest are enumerators. Ask them to join one of the formed groups. Make sure there are 3 ( or 4 , if there is an extra KI above) enumerators per assessment manager. Each facilitator joins one group (e.g Adam-FSC; Oladipo – WASH; Alex - CP) and provides participants the roles and responsibilities.

3. Assess Each group has community members (CGDs), Key Informants (KIs), enumerators (E) and assessment managers/team leaders (AM). Form assessment teams, set up the interviews as needed and at the end of the data collection stage revert with minimum 3 completed forms (min. 1 KI, 2 CGDs) Each key informant may only be interviewed once. Write down the identity of the KI and CGD members you interview on your form. Identify 3 assessment managers for the three groups - FSC, WASH and CP Give each assessment managers four copies of blank forms of their respective sector – FSC, WASH, CP and ask them to sit in opposite corners of the room. Identify 12 members of communities. Ask them to join one of the assessment managers. Make sure there are 4 community members per assessment manager. Identify 3 (up to 6 if group is big) key informants. Ask them to join one of the groups. Make sure that each group has at least one KI. Rest are enumerators. Ask them to join one of the formed groups. Make sure there are 3 ( or 4 , if there is an extra KI above) enumerators per assessment manager. Each facilitator joins one group (e.g Adam-FSC; Oladipo – WASH; Alex - CP) and provides participants the roles and responsibilities. Note that each group has community members, Key Informants, enumerators and assessment team leaders. Pair up as needed and at the end of the exercise revert with: Clarify that during the debrief, the KIs and CGD members (who provided info in the field) should be silent observers. Minimum 3 completed forms (one KI, 2 CGDs) One consolidated master form ready for submission to the KoboServer.

4. Debrief and Submit Form Following the data collection, proceed for debrief and revert with one consolidated master form ready for submission to the KoboServer. During the debrief (AM and E), discuss the answers you have on the three forms and decide which would you use on a final RNA form and why. AM marks the FINAL ANSWER on the blank form s/he received. Note: Participant who had KI and CGD roles can join the debrief as silent observers. Identify 3 assessment managers for the three groups - FSC, WASH and CP Give each assessment managers four copies of blank forms of their respective sector – FSC, WASH, CP and ask them to sit in opposite corners of the room. Identify 12 members of communities. Ask them to join one of the assessment managers. Make sure there are 4 community members per assessment manager. Identify 3 (up to 6 if group is big) key informants. Ask them to join one of the groups. Make sure that each group has at least one KI. Rest are enumerators. Ask them to join one of the formed groups. Make sure there are 3 ( or 4 , if there is an extra KI above) enumerators per assessment manager. Each facilitator joins one group (e.g Adam-FSC; Oladipo – WASH; Alex - CP) and provides participants the roles and responsibilities. Note that each group has community members, Key Informants, enumerators and assessment team leaders. Pair up as needed and at the end of the exercise revert with: Clarify that during the debrief, the KIs and CGD members (who provided info in the field) should be silent observers. Minimum 3 completed forms (one KI, 2 CGDs) One consolidated master form ready for submission to the KoboServer.

Time management Use the time wisely. The security situation allows staff to be on the ground only: 10 minutes for data collection 10 minutes for debrief and form consolidation 30 minutes group report back and plenary discussions

Group reporting and plenary Were the answer different from each other on the three forms? What answers did groups pick? Why were they chosen? What things do we need to be weary of when we do the debrief? What do we need to consider when we select an answer? What can we do if we are not sure of an answer? Did you have time to do Direct Observation or collect additional data? Aim is for groups to think about which KIs are most useful for which questions and to think about what is important to consider when choosing a final answer in the debrief. Eg. role of the KI, their knowledge, role of other in CGDs and their knowledge, direct observation, length of time in positions, how position links to the question. Remind participants about topping up data, calling further KIs if they feel the answer is not good quality.

The End