Olga Ogburn Background

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakfast networking meeting for International Year of Chemistry – University of Cambridge Scientists sharing a chemical moment in time with scientists.
Advertisements

Assessing Risk of Heavy Metals Input in Food Chain. 1. Introduction Among the many elements that occur in the natural environment about 60% of them are.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Rain Garden Research at EPA’s Urban Watershed Research Facility Emilie K. Stander,
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
 Water Pollution: Contaminants and Testing Procedures.
Matt Tabor, Maryam Salehi, Ph. D., Jesus Estaba, Andrew J. Whelton, Ph.D. Department of Civil Engineering University of South Alabama August 6, 2012 Influence.
Nutrient Fluxes in Rivers of the Mobile – Alabama River System Using WRTDS Alex Maestre Amy Ward Derek Williamson.
Division of Water Quality
Investigation of Acid Deposition Trends in the United States March 2014.
Earth’s Resources Chapter Fifteen: Soil and Fresh Water Resources 15.1 Soil 15.2 Water Resources.
GABBY PILLA & CAITLIN VERHALEN DETERMINATION OF HEAVY METAL AND ANION CONCENTRATIONS IN WATER SAMPLES.
Defending the Rights of Metals: How to Distinguish Naturally High Groundwater Concentrations from Site-Related Contamination Karen Thorbjornsen and Jonathan.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Urban Stormwater Runoff Contamination Associated with Gutter and Pipe Material Use Olga Ogburn 1 and Robert Pitt 2 1 Graduate Student; Civil, Construction,
Water Quality & Intermittent Water Supplies Dr. Nawal Sunna’ Water Authority, Ministry of Water & Irrigation Amman, Jordan Consultation on Minimum Household.
Ministry of Agriculture
Characterizing Storm Water Runoff from Natural Gas Well Sites in North-Central Texas Paul F. Hudak and David J. Wachal Department of Geography University.
Chemical and Microbiological Quality of Stormwater Runoff Affected by Dry Wells; A Case Study in Millburn, NJ Leila Talebi 1, Robert Pitt 2 1 PhD Candidate,
Introduction Agriculture is a large contributor of non-point source pollution to surface water. Field surface application of manure as a soil amendment.
Marilyn Murphy, David Plavcan, William Shepard, Donna Suevo, Jeff Thomas, Karen Trozzo, Timothy Woods and David Yezuita West Chester University July 2002.
Chapter : Seawater Fig Density of seawater to g/cm 3 Ocean layered according to density Density of seawater controlled by temperature,
Case Studies from Egypt
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluations of Heavy Metal Listings on the State of Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters Assabet.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Training
New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Supply Water Quality Bio-Stability of New York City’s Distribution Water Authors:
Dealing with Impurities in Processes and Process Simulators ChEN 5253 Design II Terry A. Ring There is not chapter in the book on this subject.
Kiersten Honig. Lynnhaven River Watershed Comprises approximately 64 square miles of land and water, with nearly 150 miles of shoreline Used to be a prime.
BIOENGINEER ANALYSIS WATER. GOALS Students learn how to collect water samples. Then, they will aseptically collect a water sample and use a microscope.
Retention Ponds as a Filtering Mechanism for Runoff Water Kurt Lane Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania Introduction Retention.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Evaluation of the removal of heavy metals using the Biosand Filter
Contact information: Institution: Latvia University of Agriculture Project contact person: Zane Dimanta Address: 19 Akademijas Str., LV-3001, Jelgava,
1 Drainage and Environment, Results of the Monitoring of Non Point Source Pollution Viesturs Jansons Department of Environmental Engineering and Water.
Stormwater Management Studies in Areas Undergoing Reconstruction Following the Tornado that Hit Tuscaloosa, AL Redahegn Sileshi 1, Robert Pitt 2, Shirley.
GROUND WATER MONITORING TO EVALUATE EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY Mike Trojan Erin Eid Jennifer Maloney Jim Stockinger Minnesota Pollution Control.
Figure 2. Decrease in K and NO 3 over time in (a) AN1, (b) AN2, (c) CA2. Best fit determined by moving average. Potential for using anaerobic settling.
Monitoring of the Agricultural Run-off in Latvia ( ) Viesturs Jansons Professor, Head of Department of Environmental Engineering and Water Management.
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Geodetic Monitoring of the Deformation of a 50,000 t Sugar Storage Tank Founded on 124 Long Bored Piles P. Savvaidis and I. Ifadis Laboratory of Geodesy.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan
Acid Deposition – the result of air pollutants combining with each other to produce acid precipitation or rainwater that has become acidic. Acid – pH lower.
Sources of Bacteria and their Variability in Urban Watersheds Robert Pitt Cudworth Professor Urban Water Systems Department of Civil, Construction, and.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
 The health of a water system is determined by the balance between physical, chemical, and biological variables.
 Water Quality Variability in a Bioswell and Concrete Drainage Pipe, Southwest Lincoln, Nebraska Jessica Shortino, B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
. The Impact of Water Quality on Service Learning Presenter: Waneene C. Dorsey, MAT, PhD Grambling State University.
Engineering Statistics Design of Engineering Experiments.
Clean Water Act Types of Pollution WATER POLLUTION.
Integration of Accelerated Precipitation Softening - Microfiltration (APS-MF) Assembly to Maximize Water Recovery from the Treatment of Brackish Water.
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 and Shirley Clark3
Corrosion of C-Steel in the Red Sea: Effect of Immersion Time
Removal efficiency of nitrate.
C.P.Martinez and L.M. Porticos
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 , and Shirley Clark3
Predicting Hotspots for Heavy Metal Contamination in Bumpus Cove, TN Melissa A. Magno, Arpita Nandi, and Ingrid Luffman, Department of Geosciences, East.
Environment and Climate Change Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Regarding Doris North Project Type A Water Licence Amendment Application Nunavut.
Pb Solids Precipitated Under Laboratory Conditions
Cudworth Professor of Urban Water Systems
* Metal in pickling waste (mg/L)
HEAVY METAL SOLUBILITY AND MOBILITY IN HUMUS LAYERS IMPACTED BY COPPER INDUSTRY IN SOUTH - WEST POLAND Agnieszka Medyńska-Juraszek, Cezary Kabała Institute.
ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS BACKGROUND CONCLUSIONS OBJECTIVES
Trace Elements in Dan River Sediment after the 2014 Coal Ash Spill Ricardo P. Fernandez, Caleb Shockley, and Madeline E. Schreiber Department of.
Atmospheric Corrosion
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2, and Shirley Clark3
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2, Shirley Clark3, and Chad Christian4
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
Water Quality What is water quality?
WGGW Bratislava – 26 October 2016
Arsenic Leaching out from CCA Contaminated Mulch
Presentation transcript:

Olga Ogburn Background Graduate Student The University of Alabama (Tuscaloosa, AL, US) Focus: Environmental Engineering Partial support is funded by NSF Was research assistant and teaching assistant in various classes since Jan. 2007 Worked as an engineer in various organizations. M.S. in Thermal Power Engineering. Moscow Power Engineering Institute (Technical University). (Moscow, Russia) (Feb. 1997) with the specialization “Technology of Water and Fuel at Thermal Electric Power Stations”

The Effects of Water Quality Parameters on the Pollutant Runoff from Drainage Materials Olga Ogburn and Robert Pitt Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama Photo: http://www.watertitegutters.com/

The Goal The purpose of this study was to investigate heavy metal releases from different pipe, gutter, and storage tank materials under a wide range of environmental conditions. The influence of pH, salinity, and time of contact were examined. This presentation will cover rate of metal release at different water conditions.

Literature Review Rooftop and pipe material contribute to the runoff water quality. Environmental parameters of the water have an effect on the concentrations of the contaminants leaching into the storm water.

Experimental Design Two series of long term-leaching laboratory tests were conducted. Eight gutter and pipe materials First series of experiments were conducted to investigate the heavy metal releases under controlled pH conditions. Roof runoff and parking lot runoff were collected in the city of Tuscaloosa and adjusted to pH 5 and pH 8 values. Disodium phosphate dehydrate and potassium phosphate monobasic (Na2HPO4 * 2H2O and KH2PO4) were used to create buffers. Waters had high phosphate and high conductivity values. Two series of long term-leaching laboratory tests were conducted using eight new gutter and pipe materials. First series of experiments were conducted to investigate the heavy metal releases under controlled pH conditions. The materials were immersed into locally collected roof runoff and parking lot runoff that were adjusted to pH 5 and pH 8 values using buffer chemicals added to the runoff water (disodium phosphate dehydrate and potassium phosphate monobasic). These buffered runoff waters had high phosphate and high conductivity values.

Experimental Design During the second testing stage, materials were immersed into un-buffered waters from Mobile Bay (saline) and the Black Warrior River. These experiments were performed to investigate the metal releases under natural pH conditions with varying salinity values associated with natural brackish bay water and river water. During the second testing stage, materials were immersed into un-buffered waters from Mobile Bay (saline) and the Black Warrior River. These experiments were performed to investigate the metal releases under natural pH conditions with varying salinity values associated with natural brackish bay water and river water.

Gutter and Pipe Materials: Gutter Materials: vinyl, aluminum, copper, and galvanized steel. Pipe Materials: concrete, HDPE, PVC, and galvanized steel. New materials Concrete pipes - 15 cm long The rest of pipes - 30 cm long

Experimental Design Sampling times: First testing stage: time zero (buffered water without pipes), 0.5 hr, 1 hr, 27 hr, 1 mo, 2 mo, 3 mo Second testing stage: time zero (unbuffered water without pipes), 1 hr, 27 hr, 1 week, 1 mo, 2 mo, 3 mo Measured Parameters: Metals (cadmium, chromium, lead, copper, zinc, aluminum, and iron) Toxicity (Microtox) pH, conductivity, Eh Nutrients (ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, nitrate) and COD

1 Galvanized steel materials were the only the source of lead release during both short and long exposure times. The loss of lead was higher for samples under pH 8 conditions compared to samples under pH 5 conditions. The greatest lead release was observed for galvanized steel pipe under pH 8 conditions and reached as high as 0.628-0.710 mg/L (corresponds to 25– 30 mg/m2).

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 The greatest copper release was detected in containers with copper materials. 27 hr exposure resulted in copper release exceeding 6 mg/L (up to 970 mg/m2). Copper release was also found in containers with other materials but in much lower concentrations.

Copper materials released very the high copper concentrations. After 3 months of exposure copper concentrations reached 35.90 mg/L (corresponds to 4420.34mg/m2) The highest copper concentrations were detected in bay water samples compared to other water conditions.

The greatest zinc losses were detected for galvanized steel materials Copper materials were the second highest source of zinc loss -Reached 0.13 mg/L (16 mg/m2) after long time exposure -Higher losses at pH 5 compared to pH 8 conditions Concrete and Plastic materials were the lowest source of zinc

Galvanized steel materials had the highest zinc release After 3 months of exposure the zinc concentrations exceeded 78 mg/L (corresponds to 3072.52 mg/m2). Zinc losses were greater under bay water conditions compared to controlled pH 5 conditions.

22 Factorial Analysis During the first testing stage to estimate the effects of Exposure time (short and long) pH value (5 and 8) During the second testing stage to evaluate the effects of Salinity (high and low) Kruskall-Wallis to determine whether the data can be combined into replicates Factorial Analysis - combined data into groups Mann-Whitney Test to see if the groups are statistically significant

Long term exposure increases copper loss.

Zinc release increased with time HDPE pipes were the lowest source of zinc No zinc release was detected from concrete pipes

Regression Analysis Regression Analysis was performed to obtain a regression equations to predict the metal release from the exposure time of the material. Time series plots of metal releases per pipe surface area vs. time were used. The data was log transformed. First Order Polynomial was fitted to the data.

Conclusions Galvanized materials resulted in the highest concentrations of zinc, while copper materials were the highest source of copper. Galvanized materials were the only source of lead releases. Zinc and lead releases were detected during both short and long exposure. During short exposure time copper releases were detected only for copper materials under all water conditions. Copper releases from copper gutters increased as pH decreased during the first series of the experiments. During the second series f the experiments copper losses were greater in bay water samples compared to river samples. Increase in zinc concentrations was detected during the first day of exposure under all water conditions. During short exposure time, zinc releases from galvanized materials were lower in river water samples compared to the bay water samples, however, during long time exposure, zinc concentrations in the river water samples exceeded those in the bay water samples.

Acknowledgements NSF EPSCoR and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the partial financial support from NSF EPSCoR and U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).