Memory….

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Objectives To review key research for the working memory model To review knowledge and understanding of models of memory To apply knowledge to.
Advertisements

Instructions Individually, choose a component of working memory. Write a short paragraph describing the main features of this working memory component.
Lesson Three: Encoding, Capacity, and Duration Specification A – Models of Memory 1.The multi-store model including concepts of encoding, capacity and.
Memory.
The Working Memory Model
The Working Memory Model. Baddeley & Hitch 1974  They felt that STM is not just one store but a number of different stores. Why?  1 store for visual.
Starter On a blank piece of paper, write down any key terms relating to the COGNITIVE approach These could be related to theories, research, evaluations,
Strange Situation AAAAAhhhhh. Cross-cultural Variation Child rearing practices vary considerably from place to place – Environment – Traditions – Beliefs.
Information Processing. History In response to Behaviorism, a cognitive model of mind as computer was adopted (1960’s, 70’s) Humans process, store, encode,
The Working Memory Model
The Working Model of Memory
Multi Store Model Calvin Laverick. Why have a model? A model is useful so we can test and investigate how memory works. – Without one, this would be very.
Memory Lesson 4 – Core Study BATs Explain the serial position effect (C/D) Describe Terry’s experiment in the recall of TV commercials (D) Outline the.
By Mr Daniel Hansson. Important definitions Encoding: When an experience is converted into a memory construct Storage: When a memory is stored over time.
The Working Memory Model was first proposed by Baddeley and Hitch in They Carried out an investigation to investigate whether there are different.
Evaluate two models or theories of one cognitive process with reference to research studies. We will be focusing on two models of memory.
Disruption of attachment. Failure to form attachment (privation) Privation refers to situations where children do not form an attachment with anyone.
Exam Questions & Mark Schemes
3.5 Evaluate two models of memory
The Multistore Model of Memory (MSM) Atkinson & Schffrin (1968)
Getting you thinking: Extension: What evidence might we consider? What might we take into consideration when evaluating the multi-store model?
Draw the WMM. Include as much detail as you can..
The Working Memory Model Baddeley & Hitch, The Working Memory Model The Diagram:
The multi-store model. Atkinson and Shiffrin 1968 A simple model A flow of information As system divided into a series of stages as information passes.
1. Multi-store Model of Memory
The effects of institutionalisation Romanian orphan studies
Day Care.
Structural, Phonological, Semantic
Topic 2 – Cognitive Psychology
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974) developed an alternative model of short-term memory which they called working memory.
3. Role of Father and Multiple Attachments
Disruption of attachment
Topic - Attachment Institutionalisation
Cognitive Psychology Cognitive psychology is the study of thinking processes. Cognitive psychologists use scientific methods to investigate how people.
Cognitive Level of Analysis
Models of Memory SAQ workshop.
Levels of Processing Memory Model (LoP)
Multi-Store Memory Model
Feedback on Memory Mini-Mock
Next lesson: key terms test from attachment – revise key terms
3.5 Evaluate two models of memory
Topic 2 – Cognitive Psychology
Multistore model of memory
WMM.
Processes in Memory Three step process…
Work this out in your heads in silence...
Paper 1 Introductory Topics
Memory: LTM Lesson 10.
Memory Models of Memory.
Memory.
For you: two models of memory
Today’s Agenda: IB Psychology Memory HW: NONE Turn in:
MSM: evaluation Lesson 11.
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
Cognitive Psychology Memory – L2
Evaluation of WMM.
Memory.
Working Memory Model Baddeley and Hitch (1974)
Module 11 Types of Memory.
Clinical Evidence to support WMM
Evidence for the Working Memory Model.
Bahrick: finish handout
Memory: sensory and working memory
P: there is real-life application for understanding different types of LTM. E: being able to identify different aspects of LTM allows psychologists to.
Bartlett’s theory of Reconstructive Memory
The Working Memory Model
G © Copyright The PiXL Club Ltd, 2017.
Module 11 Types of Memory.
Questions about Memory
Presentation transcript:

Memory…

Q’s that the following will cover… Discuss the Working Model of Memory Discuss the Multi-store Model of Memory Discuss one or more models of memory Outline the MSM and evaluate against another model of memory

Draw both models of memory in as much detail as you possibly can. The models…. Draw both models of memory in as much detail as you possibly can. Functions of stores? Encoding of stores? Capacity? Duration?

Iconic ½ sec, Echoic 3 secs MSM – A01 Acoustic Up 10 30 secs (P+P = 18) 7+-2 Semantic Up to life time Unlimited Iconic, Haptic, Echoic Iconic ½ sec, Echoic 3 secs V large capacity Linear flow of information Elaborate rehearsal needed to transfer to LTM Stores are unitary

WMM - A01 Directs attention/ resources to slave systems. ACS – does rehearsal. Repeats words seen or heard Holds visual info + manipulates spatial info to understand relationships between things Binds visual and sound info together as one episode PL – Holds sound for v short time.

WMM - A01 Model created after research was conducted. Info does not flow in linear way STM is not a unitary store Whole models shows STM- ONLY Active process of memory.

RESEARCH !!! DRILL IT Evaluating the models MSM WMM Research - support Glanzer and Cunitz – Primacy and recency effect Gathercole and Baddeley. Hollow F and Light Research - support Beardsley – MRI scans. Diff task = Diff area Baddeley – word length effect dissapears when ACS tied up. Research - against Clive Wearing Eslinger and Domasio - EVR General issues about the assumptions Do we need to rehearse, is direction linear? Craik + Lockhart level or processing… Compare Easy marks by comparing one against the other. If Q is about MSM say its inferior to WMM. If Q is about WMM say its better than MSM and Why.

Would you know how to PES all of these? Pick one and do it MSM WMM Research - support Glanzer and Cunitz – Primacy and recency effect Gathercole and Baddeley. Hollow F and Light Research - support Beardsley – MRI scans. Diff task = Diff area Baddeley – word length effect disappears when ACS tied up. Research - against Clive Wearing Eslinger and Domasio - EVR General issues about the assumptions Do we need to rehearse, is direction linear? Craik + Lockhart level or processing… Compare Easy marks by comparing one against the other. If Q is about MSM say its inferior to WMM. If Q is about WMM say its better than MSM and Why.

The WMM P: The role of Phonological loop and the Articulatory Control process has been supported by research. E - Baddeley (1975) demonstrated that people find it more difficult to remember a list of long words (such as ‘association’) rather than short words, due to there being a finite duration for rehearsal it would be possible to rehearse short words but not as many longer words. However this word length effect disappeared when a participant was given an articulatory suppression task e.g. saying ‘la la la’ before recalling the words. S: This evidence demonstrates the limited capacity of the phonological loop and the function of rehearsal by the articulatory control process as proposed in the WMM.

Change you E depending on which you choose as you r p A comparison style PES P: The assumptions of unitary stores/ the rigidity of the linear flow/ reliance on rehearsal as proposed by the MSM have been challenged by later theory. E: The MSM makes no distinction between types of Short term memory. However Baddeley and Hitch’s WMM clearly shows that there are distinctions between types of STM e.g. VSSP and The Phonological Store. Baddeley’s dual task experiments lend support for the existence of separate stores as it is possible to carry out 2 tasks at the same time if they are different in nature. S: Therefore the assumption that the Short term memory is just one store is criticised for its simplicity and for not explain how the memory functions.

Explain the difference between Reciprocity and interactional synchrony (4 marks) Outline and evaluate research into care-giver interactions…(8 marks) Very Very unlikely to get a 16 on this. There is simply not enough to discuss.

Attachment – reciprocity and Interactional Synchrony What are they doing Mirroring each others actions and emotions Responding to each others actions and emotions What does it look like? Moving in same pattern at same time. Like a conversation. example Mum sticks tongue out, baby sticks tongue out. Father and child lean towards one another, almost at exactly the same time. Mum sticks tongue out, baby laughs Triggers - this may not help…..

Meltzoff and Moore – What is this evidence of, what details do you know about the procedure and the limitations/ strengths? 12-21 days old 4 behavioural categories Concordance rate of .92 for observer scores. Replicated later with 3 day old also showed interactional synchrony = innate? No change in behaviour - babies wont change High inter-observer If occurs from 3 days - mother and baby together for strong attachment Not universal -Le Vine I.S not found in Kenya but do have high secure attachment.

Isabella Without counting them – how many mother should there be? Interactional synchrony Attachment

“Discuss the effects of institutionalisation “Discuss the effects of institutionalisation. Refer to studies of Romanian orphans in your answer.” (16)

Attachment Institutionalisation Institution – the place, hospital, care home, orphanage, prison… Institutionalisation – the effect of being in a place for long periods of time. In attachment the focus is on the fact that little emotional care provided. As a result we focus on Orphan studies specifically Rutter’s Romanian Orphanage study.

Rutter Don’t focus on the procedure too much. You need to know the effects the most Basics of the procedure: Exp group = 111 orphans adopted before 2, 54 by age 4 Control group 50 British adoptees Physical, cognitive and social tests at 4,6,11 and 15 Potential for discussing terminology privation/deprivation/ institutionalisation. Also discuss natural experiments and ethics.

Summarising the findings of the ERA TASK: Using the least amount of words possible (that still make some sense to you) summarise the changes in development for the effect’s columns. *Differentiate between those adopted before 6 months and those adopted after 6 months. Time of assessment Effect on Cognitive development Effect on Physical development Effect on Social Development On arrival * Age 4 Age 6 and 11

Summarising the findings of the ERA   Cognitive development Physical development Social Development On arrival/ at adoption IQ on arrival 63 for those adopted when over 6 months average was 45 51% were in bottom 3% of the population for weight Shorter than normal for age Smaller head circumference for age Age 4 Majority adopted before 6 months no differences. Before 6 months IQ increased from 63-107 After 6 months IQ increased from 45-90 Older adoptees still lagging behind Age 6 and 11 Adopted after 6 months many were receiving help from either special educational and/ or mental health services. Adopted after 6 months many showed disinhibited attachments (54%) and had problems with peer relationships.

So…. Discuss the effects of institutionalisation (16 marks) Reliability of findings: Morison’s study of Romanian orphans in Canada found indiscriminate friendliness was positively correlated with time spent in an institution. This reflects the disinhibited attachment type for those adopted later in life, in which they showed a relative lack of differentiation in response to adults. A01 Outline the effects: Cognitive Physical Social Make the distinction of age of adoption Strength of Longitudinal research: By assessing the children at varying ages it has been possible to suggest that a number of the negative effects of institutionalisation can disappear after sufficient time and with suitable high-quality care. If conclusions were drawn after the assessment at age 4 this may not have been the case. Application of it to improving children’s lives. In the past mothers giving up babies for adoption were encouraged to nurse their babies for a significant period of time. However research findings by Rutter et al have changed the process of adoption so that mothers who give a baby up for adoption do so in the first week of birth, so that the children can form a secure attachment with their adoptive families.