Kantarjian H et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Current Treatment Options in MDS Dick Wells MD, DPhil, FRCPC Director, Crashley Myelodysplastic Syndrome Research Laboratory Odette Cancer Centre.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA JAK.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
Monitoring CML Treatment: Addressing the Issues for the Community Hematologist/Oncologist Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD Chairman; Professor, Department of Leukemia.
Clinical importance and safety of ESAs for patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Steven D. Gore, MD Associate Professor of Oncology Sidney Kimmel.
Efficacy and Safety of Deferasirox (Exjade®) during 1 Year of Treatment in Transfusion-Dependent Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
Final Results From a Phase I Combination Study of Lenalidomide and Azacitidine in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Sekeres MA.
Efficacy, Hematologic Effects and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Platelet Starting Counts ( x 10 9 /L): A Comparison to Patients.
A Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Combined with Lenalidomide or with Vorinostat vs Azacitidine Monotherapy in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Copyright © 2009 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. National Patterns of Care Study October Randomly Selected US-based Medical Oncologists.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
CB-1 MDS Classification and Prognosis John M. Bennett, MD University of Rochester Medical Center Hematomorphologist Chair, MDS Foundation.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
CI-1 Lenalidomide Myelodysplastic Syndromes (Revlimid ®, CC-5013, CDC-501) Graham Burton, MD Senior Vice President Regulatory Affairs Celgene Corporation.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Best of ASH 2007 Myelodysplastic Syndromes Lloyd E. Damon, MD.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
ANCO 2006 ASH UPDATE MDS Joseph M. Tuscano, M.D. UC Davis Cancer Center.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida ARRAY : Phase II Trial of Carfilzomib.
Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial of 5-Day Decitabine as Front-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Cashen.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
May 29 - June 2, 2015 Leukemia Stem Cell Phenotypes Correlate With Cytogenetic Risk Factors and Outcomes CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015.
1 Oliva EN et al Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 91.
Phase III EURO-SKI: Cessation of TKI Therapy Safe, Feasible for Pts Who Achieve Deep Molecular Response New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
19-28z CAR T-Cell Efficacy and Toxicity in Adults With R/R B-Cell ALL
1 Stone RM et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 6.
Myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS)
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
Platzbecker U et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 12.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Sekeres MA et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 908.
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
HS 4160 Critical Scientific Analysis
Erba HP et al. Blood 2008;112: Abstract 558
Program Goals Case 1: Woman With MDS Risk: Cytogenetic Subgroups.
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
Rossi A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8008.
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
The Effect of Lenalidomide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Lower- Risk Non-del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results From the MDS-005.
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Bergh J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 23.
MDS: Introduction. Supportive Care in the Treatment of Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
Grövdal M et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 223.
MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME: prognosis & treatment options
Pollyea DA et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6505.
Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(11):
Managing Anemia in Lower-Risk MDS
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Tips on using ruxolitinib
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
ASH Review 2018: Update on Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Suboptimal Response to or Failure of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What Is the Optimal Strategy?  Elias Jabbour, MD, Jorge E. Cortes,
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Kantarjian HM et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 635.
Presentation transcript:

Kantarjian H et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print]. The Heterogeneous Prognosis of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Chromosome 5 Abnormalities Kantarjian H et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Introduction Lenalidomide has demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with lower-risk MDS (IPSS low or intermediate-1), transfusion dependence and with deletion 5q (del 5q) (NEJM 2006;355:1456). Hematologic and cytogenetic response rates were similar in response to lenalidomide therapy in patients with del 5q with or without additional chromosomal abnormalities, and across IPSS risk groups and a range of percent marrow blasts (NEJM 2006;355:1456). Perception has arisen that lenalidomide is equally active in all MDS subsets and in all MDS subsets with del 5q. Source: Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Introduction (continued) To establish the potential benefit of lenalidomide in patients with MDS and del 5q, randomized trials would be required or historical databases could be used to establish baseline expectations against which the benefit of lenalidomide could be compared. Current study objectives: Using a historical database, define prognosis and establish baseline expectations of patients that have MDS and deletion 5q with or without other cytogenetic abnormalities. Source: Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Retrospective Analysis of the Prognosis of Patients with MDS and Chromosome 5 Abnormalities Eligibility (n=2,743) Patients with MDS and < 20% marrow blasts referred to M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Leukemia Department since 1966 Adequate cytogenetic information available Patients Containing Chromosome 5 Abnormalities (n=503) Patients Subcategorized by Cytogenetic Subsets Deletion 5q (n=287) Monosomy 5 (n=216) Survival measured from the date of referral to M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Source: Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Survival of Patients with or without Chromosome 5 Abnormalities Patient Group Median Survival 2-year Survival Rate No chromosome 5 abn. (n=2,240) 17 mos 38% Del 5q: All patients (n=287) 9 mos 23% Monosomy 5 (n=216) 6 mos 3% Del 5q alone +1 abn. +2 abn. + ≥3 abn. + Chromosome 7 abn. 33 mos 12 mos 7 mos 64% 40% 34% 0% 2% Compared to monosomy 5, deletion 5q was more frequently associated with lower IPSS risks (IPSS low and intermediate 1 risk rates of 32% vs 7%, p < 0.001) and with lower incidence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (60% vs 97%, p < 0.0001). Abn = abnormalities Source: Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Survival of Patients with Lower-Risk* MDS According to Chromosome 5 Abnormalities Patient Group Median Survival 2-year Survival Rate Del 5q: All patients (n=93) 29 mos 60% Del 5q alone (n=55) 41 mos 67% Del 5q + 1 abn. (n=19) 24 mos 48% Del 5q + 2 abn. (n=7) 27 mos Del 5q + ≥ 3 abn. (n=6) NR Del 5q + Chromosome 7 (n=6) 13 mos 0% *Lower-risk MDS encompasses IPSS low and intermediate-1 risk groups. Source: Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Median Survival of Patients with MDS According to % of Marrow Blasts Patient Group < 5% Blasts < 10% Blasts Del 5q: All patients (n=115, 198) 15 mos 12 mos Del 5q alone (n=41, 53) 44 mos 41 mos Del 5q + 1 abn. (n=15, 24) 29 mos 24 mos Del 5q + 2 abn. (n=11, 14) 14 mos Del 5q + ≥ 3 abn. (n=21, 43) 5 mos 6 mos Del 5q + Chromosome 7 (n=27, 64) 7 mos Source: Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Summary and Conclusions It may not be appropriate for oncologists to consider patients with MDS and deletion 5q as one group. Prognosis of patients with MDS and low-risk MDS containing chromosome 5 abnormalities is heterogeneous and is worsened by the presence of other abnormalities in addition to deletion 5q. Monosomy 5 was associated less often with low-risk MDS (IPSS low and intermediate 1 risk) and more often with the presence of other adverse cytogenetic findings. Based on analysis of this study and on the entry criteria of the original lenalidomide study, the percentage of patients who are candidates for lenalidomide would be 2% to 3%. Oncologists may be offering lenalidomide to subsets of patients with MDS in which the drug is untested in controlled trials and where it may not be effective. Prognosis and baseline expectation data established by this study may be used for comparative purposes with the lenalidomide experience. Source: Kantarjian et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].

Phase 2 Study of Lenalidomide in Transfusion-Dependent, Low-Risk, and Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Karyotypes Other Than Deletion 5q Raza A et al. Blood 2008;111(1):86-93.

Erythroid Response to Lenalidomide in Patients Lacking 5q Deletion Daily dosing 10 mg/day (n=100) 21-day dosing 10 mg/day (n=114) All patients (n=214) Erythroid response1 Total transfusion response TI + ≥ 1 g/dL Hb increase ≥ 50%  no. of transfusions 42% 27% 15% 45% 25% 19% 43% 26% 17% Median time to TI 7.4 wk 4.1 wk 4.8 wk Hemoglobin Baseline, median Response, median Increase, median 7.9 g/dL 11.6 g/dL 3.3 g/dL 8.1 g/dL 11.0 g/dL 3.1 g/dL 8.0 g/dL 3.2 g/dL TI, transfusion independence; Hb, hemoglobin. 1Erythroid response measured according to modified International Working Group 2000 criteria. Source: Raza A et al. Blood 2008;111(1):86-93.

Summary and Conclusions A Phase II, multicenter trial (n=214) evaluating lenalidomide therapy in patients with a long-standing diagnosis of MDS (median 2.2 years) that is low- or intermediate-1-risk, with substantial RBC transfusion requirements (median 4 units/8 weeks) and without del 5q. In the ITT population, 26% of patients achieved transfusion independence (TI) after median 4.8 weeks of lenalidomide treatment. Median TI duration was 41 weeks and 36% or responders remained transfusion-free for at least one year (median TI duration for MDS del 5q responders was > 2 years) A reduction in the need for transfusion was seen in 43% of patients. Median rise in hemoglobin was 3.2 g/dL from baseline Lenalidomide demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in patients with transfusion-dependent, low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS without deletion 5q. Source: Raza A et al. Blood 2008;111(1):86-93.