SLUM UPGRADATION PROJECT IN DELHI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Conference on Housing: An Engine for Inclusive Growth- Inclusive Housing - Regulatory and Policy Framework of Urban Planning Prof. (DR.)
Advertisements

Integrated Urban Shelter Project Access to Secure and Adequate Housing for Syrian Refugees living in Host Communities in Jordan.
3.2.5 On-Site Land Tenure Improvement in the Philippines: The Case of Slum Upgrading Program in Quezon City, Philippines 1 UPA Package 3, Module ON-SITE.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Urbanisation in LEDC.
Securing Property Titles with Biometric Technology The Case of Bangalore Nafis Hasan Azim Premji University – Bangalore, India.
NORA LINDSTROM URBAN GOVERNANCE ADVISOR DECEMBER 2014 Survey of Urban Poor Settlements in Lilongwe.
Strategy for upgrading Delhi’s Slums
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Overview of the State of Implementation of Agenda 21, RIO+5 and JPOI in the Human.
Delivery of Basic Urban Services to the poor : City Government experiences A Presentation By MHT.
Additional analysis of poverty in Scotland 2013/14 Communities Analytical Services July 2015.
SABELO MNGUNI 23 JUNIE COMMITTEES SECTION POLICY PARAMETRES FOR HUMAN SETTLEMENTS.
CITY OF BEND | ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN AN URBAN AREA JIM LONG, AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGER HOUSING LAND ADVOCATES 2015 CONFERENCE, NOVEMBER 6, 2015.
Tshepo Makhanye Information Section: Research Unit.
THE JnNURM IN CHENNAI An assessment with focus on the urban poor Transparent Chennai.
Business solutions to social problems Social Impact Big Issue Invest Big Potential: Social Investment Explained Madeleine Thornton Social Impact Analyst.
Aleutian Village Meeting December 9, Resident Survey Results – Q1 Do you own or rent your home? 91% own your home, free and clear.
POSSIBLE FUTURE STRATEGIES – FOR JnNURM and RAY UN Habitat recognized common attributes in countries that had successfully reduced slum population: Long.
Experiences of JNNURM in Chennai and Lessons for RAY & JNNURM II Slides prepared by TRANSPARENT CHENNAI for workshop on slum policies held on July 21,
Background: The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Act, 1971 The first and only piece of legislation for slum clearance, and to establish the Slum Clearance Board.
Chapter 4 Going Into Debt. Section 1 Americans and Credit.
 Revised 5/17/16. Relocation Meeting Agenda  Vision Russell Overview & Choice Implementation Grant  Relocation Timeline  Beecher Terrace Household.
Brixton Green Brixton People Know What Brixton Needs Dinah Roake
Solar, according to Click
PARTICIPATORY PLANNING AND POLICY INFLUENCE EXPERIENCES FROM NAMIBIA
Shaping the Housing and Care Markets for All Older People
Child Care Assistance Program Waitlist
Big Issue Invest Big Potential Rochester: Social Investment Explained
MONENI URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Changes to Housing in Sao Paulo
Rehabilitation and Resettlement in Tehri Hydro Power Project-India
The characteristics and growth of shanty towns
STREET LED APPROACH TO SLUM UPGRADATION
Shelter Cluster Damage Database
Presented by: Rachel Post, L.C.S.W., Public Policy Director
Panel on Metrics for Measuring Success
Sustainable Strategies
Cities Explained.
Rodrigue Bazame, Harun Tanrıvermiş
Perspectives of Property Tax Incidence in California Forty Years after Proposition 13 Robert W. Wassmer Professor, Department of Public Policy and Administration.
Ideas and words to use in map skills questions….
MBABANE INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS UPGRADING PROJECT EXPERIENCE
A Helpful and Effective Guide to Sober Living
Supportive Services for Veteran Families
Ch.3: Population and Culture
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Personal Finance Management: Managing Credit
EU Immigration Briefing Session: Update and Workshop at the University of Salford 26 January 2018 Simon Kenny Principal Associate.
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Right of Way – Eligible for State Aid Reimbursement
Dharavi redevelopment
Slum Eviction and Resettlement in Delhi
In-situ Slum Rehabiliation
Progressive Engagement & Diversion
Access and Use of FIA Data Through FIA Spatial Data Services
Or are they really guidelines?
Shelter and reconstruction options
The of and to in is you that it he for was.
148 Transitional shelter This workshop discusses when to use transitional shelter, the common circumstances for using it, and its strengths, characteristics.
The importance of cash.
Expert Expert Group Meeting on Statistical Methodology for Delineating Cities and Rural Areas Iven M. Sikanyiti 28th-30th January 2019 United Nations:
URBAN LAND FOR THE URBAN POOR Second National Land Conference
Individualism vs Collectivism
Understanding Tenant Needs
Ways of reducing gender disparities through micro credit
Motivation for a Managed Land Settlement Programme
Why Do Inner Cities Have Distinctive Problems?
Towards a collaborative food action plan
A Canadian Perspective
How to Apply for Canada Tourist Visa OECC IMMIGRATION AUSTRALIA.
Presentation transcript:

SLUM UPGRADATION PROJECT IN DELHI Subhi Pawan Mishra Sumit L. Gade

INTRODUCTION The jhuggi jhopri clusters (JJC), a squatter settlements located on public land, is unplanned settlements in Delhi. In 2011, JJCs were estimated to include nearly 420,000 households, about 15 per cent of the city’s population. As calls to transform Delhi into a ‘world-class’ and ‘slum-free’ city have mounted in recent decades, Delhi’s JJCs have been affected by waves of eviction and demolition, their residents left homeless or relocated to distant resettlement colonies. But the city has also undertaken a range of approaches for improving JJCs ‘in- situ’, policies that, in theory, allow residents to remain in the same place. Of these, the method known as ‘in-situ upgradation’—which involves modifying the layout of a settlement and improving the level of basic services—is considered by many to be the most promising and least disruptive to residents. Yet, since its inception in the 1980s, the policy has been implemented in only four JJCs in Delhi- Ekta Vihar, Madrasi Camp, Prayog Vihar, Shahbad Daulatpur.

Ekta Vihar, JJC In-situ Up gradation of Ekta Vihar began at the behest of an NGO active in the area, which, together with the JJC’s Pradhan approached the commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) after L&DO certified that it had no plans for the site in the next fifteen years the Slum and JJ Department decided that, “the cluster would be developed by re-plotting and providing essential services like drains, streets, provision of water”. EKTA VIHAR

Plots There is confusion about the exact number of plots that were subdivided and allotted on the site. The layout plan for an ‘upgraded’ Ekta Vihar shows 447 plots; the engineer who implemented the project told us that 464 plots were allotted; the basti’s current Pradhan recalls that 472 plots were allotted, excluding some 25 jhuggis whose residents left the JJC after up gradation; and the 2006 City Development Plan for Delhi reports that 471 plots were developed at Ekta Vihar.

Plots In 1989 the Slum and JJ Department began the work of up gradation, ‘re-plotting’ the settlement at Ekta Vihar. This meant first relocating residents for a few days to vacant land across the road from the settlement, then demolishing the JJC’s jhuggis. After demolition, new plots were cut, measuring 3 by 4.17 meters. These plots, arranged in a ‘cluster-court’ layout around a common courtyard, were then allotted to eligible residents. During this visit to the settlement, the Pradhan reported a population of around 5,000, an average density of more than 10 people per plot and nearly one person per square meter. This density has put pressure on the original layout, which called for a regimented single-storey settlement. Today, many jhuggis are two storeys, and there are a significant number of four-storeyed structures, especially in the central parts of the settlement. In some cases, projections, or chajjas, stretch across the narrow inner lanes, and many of the common courtyards that were part of the original layout have been covered and enclosed to create additional shelter. Residents informed us that some of the original allottees have ‘sold’ or rented their plots and moved elsewhere.

Up gradation In 1989 the Slum and JJ Department began the work of up gradation, ‘re- plotting’ the settlement at Ekta Vihar. This meant first relocating residents for a few days to vacant land across the road from the settlement, then demolishing the JJC’s jhuggis. After demolition, new plots were cut, measuring 3 by 4.17 meters. These plots, arranged in a ‘cluster-court’ layout around a common courtyard, were then allotted to eligible residents. More than two decades after up gradation, access to services in Ekta Vihar is average, better than some ‘unimproved’ JJCs and worse than others. There is a main water line, but no distribution network, and there is no sewer line. Only one of three Community Toilet Complexes (CTCs) was fully operational in July 2014, and though the inner streets were paved, drains running along these streets were overflowing with stagnant water. Residents still do not have secure tenure, although they do hold the receipts for their plots as well as V P Singh tokens in many cases.24 In this respect, residents of an upgraded JJC are similar to those of a resettlement colony: they have some documentary proof of residence, but their rights are heavily restricted.

Up gradation The NGO helped residents to form a society, charging a membership fee of Rs 120 per household. Once the society was formed, the MCD’s Slum and JJ Department began a survey of the JJC’s population to determine eligibility for upgradation, a process that lasted five or six months. We were unable to determine the criteria used to determine eligibility in Ekta Vihar: while the engineer who managed the project explained that households had to submit ration cards issued prior to a set cut-off date to be eligible, the settlement’s current pradhan recalls that eligibility was determined by on-site verification. It is also possible that eligibility was determined through a combination of these two criteria. Despite these clear limits, the Pradhan believes that the JJC is on its way to becoming pucca (permanent). He cites electricity bills as evidence: “Earlier our electricity bills would say jhuggi number so and so, but now they say house number so and so.” The Pradhan reveals an important shift in the JJC since up gradation, a perception of new legitimacy in the eyes of the state. In addition, some marginal service improvements have also taken place in the JJC, which the Pradhan attributes to its elected representatives. Although this change is meaningful and represents some improvement in the settlement’s status, the Pradhan's sense of security must be seen in contrast to the fact that the settlement remains classified as a JJC.

Efforts Residents recall that they made only two payments during the process of up gradation, one of Rs 15 and another of Rs 25. The Slum and JJ Department issued receipts for these fees, which listed each household’s name, address, and allotted plot number. The Slum and JJ Department assisted each household in securing a bank loan of Rs 5,000 to construct a jhuggi in the upgraded settlement. The intention and perceived usefulness of the receipts (parchees) received by residents during up gradation is important to understand. Although the engineers and residents both understood that the receipts did not confer any tenure, residents recall that these conditions were not clearly stated on the receipts. This is in contrast to the very clear terms and conditions mentioned in the allotment letters given to residents found eligible at Shahbad Daulatpur JJC, a process discussed later in this report.

Analysis and learnings although slum-up gradation aims at upgrading the living conditions by providing better facilities and not relocating the people, still for the construction period, residents have to move elsewhere. they need to evacuate the place for the construction work or installation of facilities. Gov. is not punctual, they just believe in policy making and pay mere attention to the implementation part of the whole process. for a very long time, all residents have to suffer. they don't have any other choice but to wait. for example- Shahbad Daulatpur. everyone is trying to get the maximum out of the space, projections, or chajjas, stretch across the narrow inner lanes, and many of the common courtyards that were part of the original layout have been covered and enclosed to create additional shelter.

Analysis and learnings facilities provided here are not complete in themselves. for instance, main water line is present without any distributing line. population density is not what they had assumed, its growing exponentially and the design lacks any provision for the growth of density. the design is not flexible to accommodate more people. there must be some problem other wise wont be selling their plots and moving away Gov. is not punctual, they just believe in policy making and pay mere attention to the implementation part of the whole process. for a very long time, all residents have to suffer. they don't have any other choice but to wait. for example- Shahbad Daulatpur