Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Claude C. Schulman, Jacques Irani, Juan Morote, Jack A
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages e53-e56 (April 2013)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
What is New in Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer in 2007?
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (July 2018)
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Laurent Boccon-Gibod  European Urology Supplements 
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Yuanshan Cui, Yong Zhang  European Urology 
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Validation of Preoperative Nomograms Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer: A Bi-institutional Study  Alexander I. Hinev, Vesselin I. Hadjiev,
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Current Status of Combined Radiation Therapy and Androgen Suppression in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: What Is the Way Forward?  Michel Bolla  European.
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study  Stephen H. Culp, Paul.
Physical Activity and Survival After Prostate Cancer
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
RANK Ligand-targeted Therapy: A Novel Approach to Prevent Bone Loss and Fractures in Men with Prostate Cancer  Matthew R. Smith  European Urology Supplements 
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Optimal Control of Testosterone: A Clinical Case-Based Approach of Modern Androgen- Deprivation Therapy  Bertrand Tombal, Richard Berges  European Urology.
Prostate Cancer Nomograms: An Update
The Diverse Genomic Landscape of Clinically Low-risk Prostate Cancer
The 20-Yr Outcome in Patients with Well- or Moderately Differentiated Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed in the Pre-PSA Era: The Prognostic.
European Urology Oncology
Long-Term Hormonal Therapy: Who Would Benefit?
European Urology Oncology
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
Jonathan S. Brajtbord, Michael S. Leapman, Matthew R. Cooperberg 
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Oncoforum Urology: Prostate Cancer 2008 at a Glance
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 588-596 (October 2016) Utilization of a Genomic Classifier for Prediction of Metastasis Following Salvage Radiation Therapy after Radical Prostatectomy  Stephen J. Freedland, Voleak Choeurng, Lauren Howard, Amanda De Hoedt, Marguerite du Plessis, Kasra Yousefi, Lucia L. Lam, Christine Buerki, Seong Ra, Bruce Robbins, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Nikhil L. Shah, Firas Abdollah, Felix Y. Feng, Elai Davicioni, Adam P. Dicker, Robert J. Karnes, Robert B. Den  European Urology  Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 588-596 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.008 Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Distribution of the study cohort by (A) Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score, (B) Briganti (categorized by tertiles), and (C) genomic classifier risk scores. CAPRA-S = Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score; GC=genomic classifier. European Urology 2016 70, 588-596DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.008) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 (A) Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator coefficient path demonstrating the importance of genomic classifier (GC) and clinico-pathologic variables in the prediction of metastasis. The optimal penalty parameter indicated by a vertical dashed line was found using 5-fold cross-validation. (B) Survival c-indices for prediction of metastasis at 5 yr post-salvage radiation therapy (SRT) of clinico-pathologic variables, GC, and combined GC plus clinico-pathologic models evaluated on individual data sets dependent upon the completeness of the clinico-pathologic variable of interest. Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval. (C) Survival c-indices at 5 yr post-SRT for GC, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score, and Briganti risk models for prediction of metastasis, and (D) decision curve analysis comparing net benefit at 5 yr post-SRT of GC, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score, and Briganti risk models across various threshold probabilities for prediction of metastasis. ADT=androgen deprivation therapy; CAPRA-S=Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score; CI=confidence interval; EPE=extraprostatic extension; GC=genomic classifier; pPSA=preoperative prostate specific antigen; SRT=salvage radiation therapy; SVI=seminal vesicle invasion; RT=radiation therapy. European Urology 2016 70, 588-596DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.008) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Cumulative incidence curves of metastasis in which patients are stratified by (A) Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score risk categories, (B) tertiles of Briganti risk scores, (C) genomic classifier risk categories, and (D) genomic classifier risk categories after excluding those patients whom received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. CAPRA-S=Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score; GC=genomic classifier; SRT=salvage radiation therapy. European Urology 2016 70, 588-596DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.008) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions