Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
RNA Ligase Structures Reveal the Basis for RNA Specificity and Conformational Changes that Drive Ligation Forward  Jayakrishnan Nandakumar, Stewart Shuman,
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Ubiquitin Recognition by the Human TSG101 Protein
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Structure of the E. coli DNA Glycosylase AlkA Bound to the Ends of Duplex DNA: A System for the Structure Determination of Lesion-Containing DNA  Brian.
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Structural Basis for a New Templated Activity by Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase: Implications for V(D)J Recombination  Jérôme Loc'h, Sandrine Rosario,
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Oliver Weichenrieder, Kostas Repanas, Anastassis Perrakis  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
The Structure of JNK3 in Complex with Small Molecule Inhibitors
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 706-717 (July 2008) Bacterial Base Excision Repair Enzyme Fpg Recognizes Bulky N7-Substituted-FapydG Lesion via Unproductive Binding Mode  Franck Coste, Matthias Ober, Yann-Vaï Le Bihan, Maria Angeles Izquierdo, Nadège Hervouet, Heiko Mueller, Thomas Carell, Bertrand Castaing  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 706-717 (July 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Guanine Oxidized (A) Different pathways to produce the major oxidized products of guanine in DNA. (B) Fapy derivatives. As shown in (A), unsubstituted FapydG (1) is radiation-induced in DNA and N7-substituted FapydG residues result from the destabilization of the imidazole ring followed by alkylation at the N7 position of guanine: alkylation by (2) the dimethylsulfate (DMS), (3) the phosphoramide mustard (PM), (4) the aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), and (5) the 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) (Tudek, 2003). (C) Fapy analogs used in this study. These analogs were stabilized by the chemical replacement of the deoxyribose of the damage nucleoside by a cyclopentane (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Chemistry & Biology 2008 15, 706-717DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Fpg and Ogg1 Binding to cFapydG- and Bz-cFapydG-Containing DNA (A) EMSA. Binding experiments were carried out as described elsewhere (Castaing et al., 1999). As indicated, cFapydG- and Bz-cFapydG-14-mer DNA duplexes were incubated with increased protein concentrations and the resulting mixtures were analyzed by EMSA. (B) Apparent dissociation constants (KDapp). Chemistry & Biology 2008 15, 706-717DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Fpg Rotameric Selection of the Formamido Group of Fapy Derivatives (A) Focus views of the extrahelical damaged nucleoside inside the Fpg binding pocket. Left panels show a zoom-in of the substrate binding pocket in LlFpg/cFapydG-DNA (top) and LlFpg/Bz-cFapydG-DNA (bottom). The solvent accessible surface and the ribbon drawing of the protein are indicated in gray. DNA is represented by its space filling model. Carbons of the DNA are colored in vivid green for both lesions and the sugar-phosphate backbone in yellow and green for cFapydG and Bz-cFapydG, respectively. Schematic representations of the structure of the damaged nucleoside are shown in the right panels. (B) Base lesion geometry (footnote a = differences between cFapydG and Bz-cFapydG). (C) Four geometrical isomers of Fapy derivatives. One rotamer can be obtained from another by 180° rotation about the C5-N7 and/or N7-C8 bonds. Chemistry & Biology 2008 15, 706-717DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interactions between the Extrahelical Fapy-Derivatives and Fpg inside the Active Site Binding Pocket (A and B) Stereoviews of the elaborated interaction network between Fpg and cFapydG (in yellow) and Bz-cFapydG (in green). The Cα backbone of Fpg is in gray and residue side chains in pink. Covalent links in protein and DNA are drawn by ball-and-stick representation. N, O, S, and P atoms are represented by blue, red, yellow, and magenta balls, respectively. Inferred hydrogen bonds are shown as red dashed lines and water molecules mediating interactions as small red spheres. For both structures, the distance between the ammonium group of P1 and the C1′ of the target nucleoside is indicated and depicted by a light-blue dashed line. (C) Direct interactions and water molecule-mediated interactions. Direct interactions between hydrogen bond donors (D) and acceptors (A) established between enzyme residues (in green) and functional groups of the FapydG (F, in red) and Bz-FapydG (BzF, in magenta) are indicated above the dashed line of the table. Water molecules which mediate interactions between the enzyme and the damaged base are indicated in blue below the dashed line of the table. Interactions which are common between the structures of Fpg bound to cFapydG- and Bz-cFapydG are highlighted in gray. The underlined water molecule interacts only with the base moiety of the damage. See also Figure 5 to visualize each interaction in space. Chemistry & Biology 2008 15, 706-717DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 “Open” and “Closed” Conformation of the Very Flexible Part of the Fpg αF-β9 Loop Involved in the Damaged Base Recognition (A) Superposition of the backbone of the αF-β9 loop (from L214–K231) of the wild-type LlFpg bound to DNA duplex containing either an abasic site analog (1,3-propanediol and tetrahydrofuran in light-brown and brown, respectively; Pereira de Jésus et al., 2005), cFapydG (in green; this work) Bz-cFapydG (in blue; this work), and of the defective mutant ΔP1-LlFpg bound to cFapydG (in pink; Coste et al., 2004). The strictly conserved glycine residues (G216, G226, and G229) which act as a hinge in the “closed” and “open” configurations of the loop are indicated in red. Residues labeled by a red sphere are involved by their main chains in the recognition of the O6 of the damaged guanine and are often missing in the electron density map of the crystal model. Residues labeled by a blue sphere belong to a part of the loop which presents different folds in the “open” and “closed” conformations of the loop. (B) Sequence alignment of the flexible part of the αF-β9 loop from L. lactis Fpg (LlFpg), B. stearothermophilus (BstFpg), and T. thermophilus (TtFpg). Identical residues are colored in bold red, similar residues in bold black and nonconserved residues in black. The strictly conserved glycine residues are shown in white on a red background. Labeling by red and blue spheres is defined in (A). (C) “Closed” conformation of the αF-β9 loop. Here is represented a superposition of the E200–H228 segment of the loop of free TtFpg (in pink; Sugahara et al., 2000), the E213–L239 segment of the defective mutant E2Q–BstFpg bound to 8-oxodG-DNA duplex (in gray; Fromme and Verdine, 2003), and the L210–K235 segment of the wild-type LlFpg protein bound to cFapydG-DNA duplex (in green; this work). (D) Stereoviews of the superposition of the loops of E2Q-BstFpg bound to 8-oxodG-DNA (gray) and wild-type LlFpg bound to cFapydG-DNA (green) showing the interactions of the loop residues with oxidized guanines (see also Figure 4). Residues indicated are those of the wild-type LlFpg (this work). Labeling by red and blue spheres is defined in (A). Chemistry & Biology 2008 15, 706-717DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Proposed Model for the Recognition of the AFB1-FapydG DNA Adduct by Fpg (A) Overview of the model and (B) enlargement at the level of the extrahelical damaged nucleoside. The graphic representation and the orientation in (B) of the model are similar to those used in Figure 3A. The benzyl group of Bz-cFapydG in the crystal structure of wt-LlFpg bound to Bz-cFapydG-DNA is replaced by the AFB1 group. Rotation around the C5-N7-C8A-O7 dihedral angle leads to a position for which no steric clashes were observed between the AFB1 adduct and the protein. In such a position, the AFB1 moiety points toward the solvent outside the Fpg binding pocket. The structure of the AFB1 adduct we used to construct the model is that observed in the solution structure of the AFB1-FapydG-DNA (1hm1; Mao et al., 1998). Chemistry & Biology 2008 15, 706-717DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Rotamer IV of Fapy-Derivatives: A Molecular Trap for Fpg (A) Fpg/DNA abortive complex. Left panel: superimposition of E2Q-BstFpg bound to 8-oxodG-DNA (purple) and wt-LlFpg bound to Bz-cFapydG-DNA (green). Right panel: schematic representation of wt-LlFpg bound to Bz-FapydG-DNA showing the stabilization of the P1 ammonium by the formyl group of the damaged nucleoside. (B) Fpg/DNA productive complex. (Left) Superimposition of crystal models of wt-LlFpg bound to either tetrahydrofuran (THF)-containing DNA (blue) or cFapydG-DNA (yellow). THF is an abasic site analog. (Right) Schematic representation of wt-LlFpg bound to FapydG-DNA showing the activation of the catalytic P1 by the E2 residue through the mediation of the water molecule w44 which plays the role of a general acid-base catalyst. In such a mechanism, the E5 residue and the extrahelical damage collaborate to guide the activated w44 toward the P1 ammonium target (right). Chemistry & Biology 2008 15, 706-717DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.014) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions