Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 8 Witnesses— Competency and Perjury.
Advertisements

CVLS Hearsay Refresher Who Cares About Hearsay? A Four-Step Hearsay Formula Hearsay Exceptions Questions.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORENSIC SCIENCE CHAPTER 2.
Chapter 7: Evidence and Procedure Evidence: Proves/Disproves fact in issue Procedure: Rules of Court.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
The “True” Exceptions and Dan the Dreadful Declarant.
Criminal Law Update & Review NC Conference of Superior Court Judges November, 2004 Jessica Smith School of Government, UNC-Chapel Hill Click Here For Sound.
Evidence Fundamentals
Hearsay Exceptions Steven Magnone.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE. Hearsay Evidence Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove.
Confrontation Clause The right to confront and cross exam your accusers.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney 2 Copyright Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Assessing Credibility. Assessing Credibility is the substance of most trials. Credibility = Honesty + Reliability.
Objections CRIMINAL LAW – UNIT #3. OBJECTIONS An objection:  is a formal protest raised in court during a trial to disallow a witness's testimony or.
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
The Trial Process and the Investigator as a Witness.
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Courts NYC Elder Abuse Training Project.
Hearsay 5: General Exception. Where we are at: Starr (SCC) Rule #1 Rule #1 Hearsay evidence is presumptively inadmissible unless it falls under an exception.
MEDICAL RECORDS Admissabilty: Hearsay exceptions Authentication Who can sponsor the evidence? What can it be used for? How to get it in? What to do with.
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES P. JANICKE Chap. 6: Witness Competency2 MODERN VIEW NEARLY EVERYONE IS COMPETENT NEED SUFFICIENT ABILITY TO BE HELPFUL:
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
HEARSAY! BY MICHAEL JOHNSON. COMMON LAW DEFINITION “ An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Experts and Lay Witness
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Law of Evidence Oral Evidence.
Forensic and Investigative Accounting
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Basic Evidence Foundations
Introduction to Cross Examination, Impeachment, and Hearsay
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Criminal Evidence Marjie Britz Chapter Ten: Hearsay
Chapter Sixteen Rules of Evidence  .
Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.
JUDICIAL WORKSHOP FOR SDMs & EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE - 23rd June 2009
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017
Candor and Truthfulness in the Age of Fake News and Alternative Facts
ROBBERY VICTIM AND LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH
AGENDA Brief Lecture on Chapters courtroom evidence and jury selections and juries Film, 12 angry men Written exercise
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
Master the 10 Most Difficult Things
Master the 10 Most Difficult Things
Principles of Evidence
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Management Skills LET II.
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Witnesses’ Roles in a Case
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Inn of Court: Trial Practices
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAPTER 4, PARTS D-H RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW “UNAVAILABLE” Prof. Janicke 2019.
Alison Chandler Hearsay Exceptions Continued Unavailability Former testimony Dying Declarations Declarations against.
The Bases for Objecting During Witness Examination
Hearsay Exceptions - Rules 803 and 804
Presentation transcript:

Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics I Cannot Tell a Lie: The Biological Basis of the Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay Rule Michael Vandenbergh David Chooljian Vanderbilt University School of Law April 6, 2006

What is the hearsay rule? Key Questions What is the hearsay rule? What is the excited utterance exception? Why do we have these rules? Does our understanding of the brain provide support for the excited utterance exception? Does it suggest modifications to the excited utterance exception? Can law help frame questions for biological research? 2

The Problem: Reliability of The Hearsay Problem The Problem: Reliability of Testimony The Legal Solution: Cross- Examination The Next Problem: Hearsay Cross Examination: Witness v. Declarant 3

Federal Rules of Evidence 801, 802 The Hearsay Rule Federal Rules of Evidence 801, 802 Out of court statement By someone other than the witness Offered for the truth of the proposition Example: “that has been on the floor several hours” 4

The Excited Utterance Exception Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) Utterance admissible: If declarant experiences a startling event or condition; and If declarant makes a statement while under the stress of excitement caused by the condition 5

The Excited Utterance Exception Unavailability of the declarant not required. Tesimony that declarant was distraught and that there was a basis for the distress often sufficient to establish that the statement was made in a state of excitement. 6

The Excited Utterance Exception Courts vary on the length of the temporal gap that may occur between the event and the statement (“duration of the state of excitement”). Declarant’s increased trustworthiness is a surrogate for cross-examination. Wigmore on Evidence § 1747 (1904): “a condition of excitement which temporarily stills the capacity of reflection and produces utterances free of conscious fabrication.” 7

The Neurophysiology of Excited Utterances: Key Questions Is it physically impossible to lie when making an excited utterance? If not impossible, is it more difficult? Any utterance or only wordless exclamations? What is the maximum time interval? What is the necessary extent of excitement? Do certain events “still the mind” more than others? 8

The Neurophysiology of Excited Utterances: Overview ACG Preconscious Utterance Laugh, Cry, Scream t = 300-700ms Normal Utterance t is variable; 500-600ms min. Deceptive Utterance 100ms < t < 3s fMRI limits 9

Implications, Part I Is it physically impossible to lie when making an excited utterance? Any utterance or only wordless exclamations? What is the maximum time interval? What is the necessary extent of excitement? 10

Implications, Part II Broader Questions Does biological research offer insights for other rules of evidence (e.g., exception for present sense impressions)? When can law frame questions for biological research? When can the results of biological research influence legal doctrines? Should law reflect the product of biological research? 11