Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-operative Imatinib for metastatic, recurrent and locally advanced GISTs E. Efthimiou, S Mudan E. Efthimiou, S Mudan On behalf of the Sarcoma Group.
Advertisements

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Implementing NICE guidance
CRITICAL APPRAISAL ON AN ARTICLE ABOUT PROGNOSIS
50 Vs 50 A Comparison of the Oncologic Outcomes of Retropubic Prostatectomy and Robotic Prostatectomy Chris Ogden Tim Christmas Jordan Durrant Khalid A.
PROSTATE CANCER da Vinci Robot Surgery Cedric Emery, MD. FACS
NPCA data collection on men undergoing radical surgery for prostate cancer Paul Cathcart, NPCA Urology Project Coordinator.
PROSTATE CANCER Dr Samad Zare Assistant Proffesor of Urology Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences.
Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer Management Michael E. Karellas Assistant Professor of Urologic Oncology May 15, 2010.
Introduction Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is effective, but can be associated with debilitating side.
The PRIAS Study In Australia One Institution’s Experience Introduction PRIAS (Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance – NTR1718) is.
Radical Prostatectomy: A Critical Analysis of Surgical Quality Between the Open and Laparoscopic Approaches. Karim Touijer, MD.
Prevention Strategies Rajesh G. Laungani MD Director, Robotic Urology Chairman, Prostate Cancer Center Saint Joseph’s Hospital, Atlanta.
Role of MRI and MRSI in The Management of Prostate Cancer Karim Touijer, MD.
Mr Jonathan Lewin MBBS, MRCS, MD, FRCS(Urol), FRACS Consultant Uro-Oncological Surgeon.
Radical Prostatectomy Sept 2009 till Aug 2010 South Mersey Cancer Network Manal Kumar Consultant Urologist.
PROSTATE CANCER LETS DEBATE !!!! Dr Fred C Tyler MBChB FRCS FCS UROL.
PSA & Prostate Cancer Dan Burke Consultant Urological Surgeon
Prostate Cancer Int. 洪 毓 謙. Prostate cancer is the Second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States American male, the lifetime risk of:
Controversies in the management of PSA-only recurrent disease Stephen J. Freedland, MD Associate Professor of Urology and Pathology Durham VA Medical Center.
© Cancer Research UK 2008 Registered charity number Prostate cancer – UK December 2009.
 These slides were extracted from a larger set of comprising a presentation entitled “Comparing Treatment Results of PROSTATE CANCER” dated 15_01_2013(3).
Treatment options for locally recurrent Prostate Cancer Giuseppe Simone Mediterranean School of Oncology Roma
Prostate cancer: To screen or not to screen – To treat or not to treat Dr Oliver Klein – Medical Oncologist.
Modern Management of Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance PROSTATE CANCER SYMPOSIUM NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE SEPTEMBER 10,
RISK OF NON SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS DIAGNOSED BY AN EXTENDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY PROCEDURE AND TREATED BY RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY.
Surrogate End point for Prostate Cancer- Specific Mortality After RP or EBRT A D’Amico J Nat Ca Inst 95,
Dan Spratt, MD Department of Radiation Oncology Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: FDG-PET and Targeted Molecular Imaging.
Chondrosarcoma of the chest wall: primary diagnostics is decisive for outcome Björn Widhe and Henrik Bauer.
Prostate Cancer: A Case for Active Surveillance Philip Kantoff MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School.
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological and Functional Outcomes Following Fellowship Training. Introduction Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is a technically.
CASE 1 65-year-old man No other diseases or previous surgeries July 2005: PSA 11.5 ng/ml; F/T: 9% After prostate biopsy revealing adenocarcinoma: RETROPUBIC.
Protocols for Advanced Prostate Cancer and/or Local Failure After Radical Prostatectomy Isaac Powell, MD.
Prostate Cancer: Treatment choices Prostate Cancer: Treatment choices Winston W Tan MD FACP Winston W Tan MD FACP Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Genitourinary.
SC-PM6: Prediction Models in Medicine: Development, Evaluation and Implementation Michael W. Kattan, Ph.D. Ewout Steyerberg, Ph.D. Brian Wells, M.S., M.D.
South West Public Health Observatory The changing casemix of prostate cancer patients and prostatectomies in the South West Sean McPhail.
Postsurgical Risk Factors for Prostate Cancer Mortality Slideset on: Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer–specific mortality.
Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer Anna Bill-Axelson, M.D., Lars Holmberg, M.D., Ph.D., Mirja Ruutu, M.D., Ph.D., Michael.
Debra Freeman, MD – Naples Christopher King, MD, PhD - Stanford.
Carcinoma of the prostate. INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in.
Primary sarcomas of the spine. A 5-year retrospective analysis. Hadjigeorgiou GF, Zisakis A, Markogiannakis G, Petrosyan T, Mylonakis I, Panteli A, Hadjigeorgiou.
Professor Guram Karazanashvili MD, KMSc, DMSc MMT Hospital.
Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer
Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
International Neurourology Journal 2015;19:
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Surgical Treatment in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
Professor Guram Karazanashvili MD, KMSc, DMSc MMT Hospital
Bladder Cancer and Prostatic Cancer
Post Op Positive Apex Margins Case 3: Prostate_3
MINIMALLY INVASIVE URO-ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS ON THE AMBULATORY SETTING PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY I125 Luís Campos Pinheiro.
New Tracers for Prostate Cancer Imaging
New perioperative risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon experience in high volume Canadian.
RTOG 0126 A Phase III Randomized Study of High Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT versus Standard Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT in Patients Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer Bijoy.
Osteosarcoma Jessica Davis.
Post Op Positive Seminal Vesicle Case 4: Prostate_4
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
ROBOTIC ASSISSTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OUR INITIAL EXPERIENCE
Prostate Cancer Screening- Update
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
EARLY AND LATE COMPLICATIONS OF PROSTATE LOW DOSE BRACHYTHERAPY
External Beam Radiotherapy as Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Might Men Diagnosed with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Benefit from Definitive Treatment of the Primary Tumor? A SEER-Based Study  Stephen H. Culp, Paul.
What's New in Prostate Cancer: Highlights from Urologic and Oncologic Congresses in 2006  Michel Soulié, Nicolas Mottet, Laurent Salomon, Jacques Irani,
Prostate Cancer Update
Management of Prostate Cancer: Global Strategies
Fernando P. Secin, Fernando J. Bianco, Nicholas T
Surgery for high-risk prostate cancer: The results of first 80 cases
Presentation transcript:

Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata

ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER

Prostate cancer is the most common non skin malignancy and associated with significant cancer associated mortality in male population. 15% - 30% of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer have high risk, non-metastatic disease. HRPC was classified as having any of the following features: PSA>20ng/ml, Gleason score 8 – 10, or clinical T stage ≥T2c. Patient should be treated in multimodality setting. RP is an option for treatment of HRPC either alone or as a part of multimodal therapy

Our database of RARP patients from January 2014 to December 2017. All the patients were operated by the same team comprising with single console surgeon and two surgeons at patient site for changing of hand instrument and assistance, using a da Vinci-S four arm surgical robot. All surgeries were performed through standard six port trans peritoneal approach.

All patients had preoperative data including clinical stage, PSA at diagnosis, needle biopsy Gleason Score. Patients were again reclassified according to final histopathology reports. Post-operatively all patients were followed up with PSA measurement at 3months and then every 3 monthly. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as two consecutive serum PSA value of > 0.2ng/ml. Functional outcome was evaluated only for incontinence..

Total no . 27 High risk - 20 Intermediate - 05 Low - 02 Pre-operative Post-operative High Risk - 24 Intermediate - 03 Low - 00

High risk group patients: Mean age of the patient were 64.77 years (range: 53years – 78years) Mean PSA level were 15.71 ng/ml (range: 7.24 – 37.5). Preoperatively,

Technique No. of patients Bilateral NVB sparing 16(59.3%) Unilateral NVB sparing 08(29.6%) Non-NVB sparing 03(11.1%)   Final HPE : 24(88.8%) patients had Gleason score 8-10 . 03 (11.2%) patients had Gleason score 7 . Only one (04.16%) patient had positive surgical margin. Two (8.33%) patients had EPE. Seminal Vesicle involvement was found in two (8.33%) patients.

No patients experienced cancer specific mortality. Median follow up of the patients was 24months (maximum 48 months). Biochemical recurrence was detected in 6 (25%) patients. Earliest BCR was at 3months. At 3months, 3(12.5%) patients developed BCR. Out of this 3patients one patient had margin positive disease. At 9 months another 3 patients developed BCR. At 2 years follow up BCR free survival rate were 75% in high risk group. Margin positivity and primary Gleason grade were two independent factors for BCR. Those patients with BCR received RT+ADT for management of BCR.

3 patients lost in follow up after 2 year. Rate of incontinence after operation: Urinary continence achieved after 1 year : 88.89% no. of patient No. of Pad Used Day 1 Day 7 Day 30 At 3 months At 6 months At 1 year Nil 00 07 10 20 22 24 01 05 08 04 02 02 – 03 16 06 > 03 03

Low risk group patients may turn to be high risk group in final HPE. RARP is an option in high risk group patients in multimodality setting. Low risk group patients may turn to be high risk group in final HPE. Margin positivity and primary Gleason grade were two independent factors for BCR. Continence usually improved with time and may take more than 1year time. Older group patient has also equivalent result like young patients.

THANK YOU