REBECCA Relationships between ecological and chemical status of surface waters (2004-2006) Main objective: Provide relevant scientific support for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EEA 2012 State of water assessments Ecological and chemical status and pressures Peter Kristensen Project manager – Integrated Water Assessments, EEA Based.
Advertisements

Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway Workshop on ”In situ trialing for ecological and chemical studies in support of.
Mats Wallin Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences Dept. of Environmental Assessment Catarina Johansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Development.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
Test data exchange to support development of a biological indicators in rivers and lakes Anne Lyche Solheim and Jannicke Moe, NIVA EEA European Topic Centre.
WG 2A ECOSTAT Meeting 4-5 March 2004 Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT summary Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
FI: Ansa Pilke and Liisa Lepisto, Finnish Environment Institute NO: Dag Rosland, Norwegian National Pollution Control Authority Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian.
CESSDA – for what and for whom?
Biological quality elements, intercalibration and ecological status
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
Intercalibration Results 2006
Support to National Helpdesks
Results of the metadata analysis Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) March 4-5 , 2004, Ispra, Italy Peeter Nõges Anna-Stiina.
Support to National Helpdesks
Seppo Rekolainen Finnish Environment Institute - SYKE
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
CW-TW Intercalibration results
Anne Lyche Solheim, NIVA EEA European Topic Centre on Water
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Central Rivers Geographical Intercalibration Group
Benchmarking Models for the Water framework directive
WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
Intercalibration Report on State - of - play and way forward Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute for Environment.
Final COAST working group meeting
CorMan The new European Commission funded initiative
EurAqua 8th Scientific and Technical Review,
Central-Baltic Rivers GIG progress
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
CIS workshop : assessment of the ecological status.
Seppo Rekolainen Finnish Environment Institute
London Water Directors Meeting
Working Group A ECOSTAT Summary Milestone Reports: River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Cost Effectiveness Analysis Questionnaire Results
REFCOND Workshop Uppsala, May 2001
Northern GIG - Organisation
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Introduction & objectives Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Update on intercalibration Prepared by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
River Fish Intercalibration group ( )
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
CIS workshop : assessment of the ecological status.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Sylvia Archmann European Institute of Public Administration, NL
PT-WFD - The self committed Network of PT providers
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
EU Water Framework Directive
Why a KETs Observatory ? Commission Communication on Key Enabling Technologies (2012) : "There is no validated market data on development and take-up of.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, October 2005
Part I.
Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
River Fish Intercalibration group D. Pont,Cemagref, France)
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Joint Action on Market Surveillance of medical devices (JAMS)
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Presentation transcript:

REBECCA Relationships between ecological and chemical status of surface waters (2004-2006) Main objective: Provide relevant scientific support for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) 19 partners from 14 countries

REBECCA WP-structure REBECCA WP1: Coordination and Management WP7 Dissemination WP3: Lakes WP4: Rivers WP5: Coastal waters WP2: Present knowledge and practices WP6: Validation of techniques, practical implications Common Implementation Strategy: ECOSTAT Competent Authorities and users in member states Project Advisory Board Stakeholders and NGOs

REBECCA partners Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Partic. no. Participant name Participant short name Country 1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE Finland 2 Joint Research Centre JRC EC 3 Norwegian Institute for Water Research NIVA Norway 4 National Environmental Research Institute NERI Denmark 5 DHI Water & Environment DHI 6 WL | Delft Hydraulics WL|Delft Netherlands 7 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology NERC/CEH UK 8 Centre National du Machinisme Agricole, du Génie Rural, des Eaux et des Forêts Cemagref France 9 Water Research Institute IRSA Italy 10 Swedish Environmental Research Institute IVL Sweden 11 Trinity College Dublin TCD Ireland 12 Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute SHMI Slovak Republic 13 Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e das Pescas IPIMAR Portugal 14 University of Antwerp UA Belgium 15 Danube Delta National Institute DDNI Romania 16 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research NINA 17 Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment RIZA The Netherlands 18 Tallinn Technical University TTU Estonia 19 Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet SLU

REBECCA programme

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies Principle roles: REBECCA ECOSTAT Scientific advice on: reference conditions biol. metrics response curves validation GIGs decide: Boundary setting prot. Boundaries h/g + g/m

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies Types and reference conditions: REBECCA will: focus on IC types for lakes, rivers and coastal waters analyse and propose type-specific ref.cond. for different quality elements (starting autumn 2004) GIGs can: use REBECCA proposals as input to their discussions on first step in Boundary Setting Protocol

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies Metrics for biological quality elements: REBECCA will: Analyse and propose different metrics for different quality elements (spring 2005) GIGs can: Evaluate and discuss REBECCA proposals depending on their data availability and plans for new sampling in 2005

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies Metrics for biological quality elements: REBECCA will focus on: Category Phyto-plankton Macro-phytes /benthic algae Benthic inverte- brates Fish Rivers ? + ++ (AQEM/ STAR) Lakes Coastal waters -

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies Data collection and analysis REBECCA will: Collect data spanning the whole pressure gradient for eutrophication, acidification, hydromorphological pressures and toxic substances Analyse response curves for different pressures and quality elements (metrics) GIGs will: Collect and analyse data from IC sites (option 3), + other sites covering the whole pressure gradient for eutrophication and acidification (where relevant), if options 1or 2 are chosen Set boundaries h/g+g/m data results

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies Benefits of collaboration for data collection and analysis: REBECCA will: have access to data outside the present consortium enabling REBECCA to produce results that will be much more comprehensive, scientifically reliable, and relevant to be used at the European level to support the fulfillment of the WFD IC process

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies Communication should be ensured through: GIG-coordinators and REBECCA WP-leaders should exchange e-mail-addresses GIG-coordinators should contact REBECCA WP-leaders when planning data requests within the GIGs (to discuss data formats, level of aggregation etc.) GIG-coordinators attending relevant REBECCA workshops GIG-coordinators should attend the REBECCA end-user meeting in January 2005 REBECCA WP leaders and key partners should be invited to GIG meetings REBECCA coordinator (and possibly relevant WP leaders) will continue to attend ECOSTAT meetings, in which also the GIG coordinators attend

REBECCA and ECOSTAT mutual synergies REBECCA WP-leaders WP1 Coordination: Seppo Rekolainen, SYKE, Finland (seppo.rekolainen@ymparisto.fi) WP2 Literature review: Anna-Stiina Heiskanen, JRC, EU-commission (anna-stiina.heiskanen@jrc.it) WP3 Lakes: Anne Lyche Solheim, NIVA, Norway (anne.lyche@niva.no) WP4 Rivers: Jens Möller Andersen, NERI, Denmark (jea@dmu.dk) WP5 Coastal waters: Hanne Kaas, DHI, Denmark (hka@dhi.dk) WP6 Validation: Harm Duel, WL Delft, Netherlands (harm.duel@wldelft.nl) WP7 Dissemination: David Boorman, CEH, UK (dbb@ceh.ac.uk)