1.2 Propositional Equivalences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Propositional Equivalences
Advertisements

Chapter 21: Truth Tables.
Propositional Equivalences
PROOF BY CONTRADICTION
Goals Determine the true value of statements with AND, OR, IF..THEN. Negate statements with the connectives above Construct truth tables Understand when.
Uses for Truth Tables Determine the truth conditions for any compound statementDetermine the truth conditions for any compound statement Determine whether.
1 Section 1.2 Propositional Equivalences. 2 Equivalent Propositions Have the same truth table Can be used interchangeably For example, exclusive or and.
Discrete Mathematics Math 6A Instructor: M. Welling.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/20/11 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
Chapter 2: The Logic of Compound Statements 2.1 Logical Forms and Equivalence 12.1 Logical Forms and Equivalences Logic is a science of the necessary laws.
Adapted from Discrete Math
Discrete Mathematics Goals of a Discrete Mathematics Learn how to think mathematically 1. Mathematical Reasoning Foundation for discussions of methods.
Propositions and Truth Tables
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications
Mathematical Structures A collection of objects with operations defined on them and the accompanying properties form a mathematical structure or system.
Copyright © Curt Hill Truth Tables A way to show Boolean Operations.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence.
BY: MISS FARAH ADIBAH ADNAN IMK. CHAPTER OUTLINE: PART III 1.3 ELEMENTARY LOGIC INTRODUCTION PROPOSITION COMPOUND STATEMENTS LOGICAL.
Propositional Equivalences
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 2 Section 1.1 Fri, Jan 19, 2007.
Logic Disjunction A disjunction is a compound statement formed by combining two simple sentences using the word “OR”. A disjunction is true when at.
Barnett/Ziegler/Byleen Finite Mathematics 11e1 Chapter 7 Review Important Terms, Symbols, Concepts 7.1. Logic A proposition is a statement (not a question.
The Foundations Logic and Proofs by raedRASHEED 2014.
How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?
Thinking Mathematically
Section 1.2: Propositional Equivalences In the process of reasoning, we often replace a known statement with an equivalent statement that more closely.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 1 Section 1.1 Wed, Jan 12, 2005.
Venn Diagrams Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Converse, Inverse,
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
1 Section 6.2 Propositional Calculus Propositional calculus is the language of propositions (statements that are true or false). We represent propositions.
Tautology. In logic, a tautology (from the Greek word ταυτολογία) is a formula that is true in every possible interpretation.logic Greek formulainterpretation.
 To combine propositions using connectives  To construct the truth table of a given compound proposition  To define de Morgan Law for logic  To define.
Thinking Mathematically Logic 3.4 Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional.
Conditional statement or implication IF p then q is denoted p ⇒ q p is the antecedent or hypothesis q is the consequent or conclusion ⇒ means IF…THEN.
 Conjunctive Normal Form: A logic form must satisfy one of the following conditions 1) It must be a single variable (A) 2) It must be the negation of.
Chapter 1 Propositional Logic
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 01/23/17
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS CHAPTER I.
Lecture 03 Logic and Propositional Calculus Profs. Koike and Yukita
Citra Noviyasari, S.Si, MT
Logical Equivalence of Propositions
Chapter 1 Logic and Proofs.
Classwork/Homework Classwork – Page 90 (11 – 49 odd)
How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?
2.1 Propositions and Logical Operations
Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 2.
Logic – Bell Ringer.
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
Propositional Equivalences
Propositional Equivalences
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Kenneth H
Lecture 2: Propositional Equivalences
Discrete Mathematics CMP-200 Propositional Equivalences, Predicates & Quantifiers, Negating Quantified Statements Abdul Hameed
CSE 321 Discrete Structures
Logical Truth To show a statement A is a logic truth (tautology) ...
1.2 Propositional Equivalences
Statements of Symbolic Logic
Dr. Halimah Alshehri MATH 151 Dr. Halimah Alshehri Dr. Halimah Alshehri.
1.2 Propositional Equivalences
Section 3.3 Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional
Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional
Representing Boolean Functions
A THREE-BALL GAME.
Logical truths, contradictions and disjunctive normal form
Truth Tables for Conditional and Biconditional Statements
Propositional Satisfiability
Presentation transcript:

1.2 Propositional Equivalences DEFINITION 1 A compound proposition that is always true, no matter what the truth values of the propositions that occur in it, is called a tautology. A compound proposition that is always false is called a contradiction. A compound proposition that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction is called a contingency. Dr. Halimah Alshehri

propositional variable. EXAMPLE 1 We can construct examples of tautologies and contradictions using just one propositional variable. Consider the truth tables of p v ┐p and p ˄ ┐p, shown in Table 1 . Because p v ┐p is always true, it is a tautology. Because p ˄ ┐ p is always false, it is a contradiction. Dr. Halimah Alshehri

Dr. Halimah Alshehri

Logical Equivalences DEFINITION 2 The compound propositions p and q are called logically equivalent if p ↔q is a tautology. The notation p ≡ q denotes that p and q are logically equivalent. Dr. Halimah Alshehri

In particular, the compound propositions p and q are equivalent if and only if the columns giving their truth values agree. EXAMPLE 2 Show that ┐(p v q ) and ┐p ˄ ┐q are logically equivalent. Dr. Halimah Alshehri

Dr. Halimah Alshehri

EXAMPLE 3 Show that p  q and ┐p v q are logically equivalent. Dr. Halimah Alshehri

Dr. Halimah Alshehri

Example 4: Show that ¬(p → q) and p ∧¬q are logically equivalent. Dr. Halimah Alshehri

Homework Page 34,35 1(b,c) 2 9 (a,e) 16 Dr. Halimah Alshehri