Southern California Earthquake Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Real-Time Estimation of Earthquake Location and Magnitude for Seismic Early Warning in Campania Region, southern Italy A. Zollo and RISSC-Lab Research.
Advertisements

A Pseudo-Dynamic Rupture Model Generator for Earthquakes on Geometrically Complex Faults Daniel Trugman, July 2013.
Earthquake Dynamic Triggering and Ground Motion Scaling J. Gomberg, K. Felzer, E. Brodsky.
(Introduction to) Earthquake Energy Balance
Predictive Modeling of Seismicity Sequences in Southern California Julia Clark David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
Tidal triggering of earthquakes: Response to fault compliance? Elizabeth S. Cochran IGPP, Scripps.
Numerical simulation of seismic cycles at a subduction zone with a laboratory-derived friction law Naoyuki Kato (1), Kazuro Hirahara (2), and Mikio Iizuka.
Fault friction and seismic nucleation phases Jean-Paul Ampuero Princeton University J.P. Vilotte (IPGP), F.J. Sánchez-Sesma (UNAM) Data from: W. Ellsworth,
A DECADE OF PROGRESS : FROM EARTHQUAKE KINEMATICS TO DYNAMICS Raúl Madariaga Laboratoire de Géologie, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
Earthquake interaction The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
The seismic cycle The elastic rebound theory.
March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:
SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/021 Numerical Modeling Using Finite Difference Techniques.
Stress III The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.
GEO1011 Chap. 19 : Earthquakes. 2 Chap 19: Earthquakes What is an earthquake and its relation to plate tectonics The seismic waves How to locate an earthquake.
Near-Field Modeling of the 1964 Alaska Tsunami: A Source Function Study Elena Suleimani, Natalia Ruppert, Dmitry Nicolsky, and Roger Hansen Alaska Earthquake.
Segments of the San Andreas Fault Historically, the San Andreas has been divided up into individual fault segments that range from tens to hundreds of.
San Andreas Big Bend A geometric feature Restraining the relative plate motion Nature’s solution Impacts include:  patterns of faults, seismicity  Rupture.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Recipe of strong motion prediction for future earthquakes Seminar at Charles University, Prague, Czech September 5, 2003 Kojiro Irikura Disaster Prevention.
The Evolution of Regional Seismicity Between Large Earthquakes David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton Geoffrey C. P. King Institut de Physique.
1/23/12 - Bellringer ► How might you measure an earthquake?
Large-scale 3-D Simulations of Spontaneous Rupture and Wave Propagation in Complex, Nonlinear Media Roten, D. 1, Olsen, K.B. 2, Day, S.M. 2, Dalguer, L.A.
Chapter 4 Earthquakes Map is from the United States Geological Survey and shows earthquake hazard for the fifty United States.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
Jhungli-Taiwan 2009 Testing earthquake triggered landslides against earthquake aftershocks for space distributions (implications for triggering processes)
Southern California Earthquake Center Triggering Models vs. Smoothed Seismicity PG = 1.35/eqk PG = 10/eqk Information gain per earthquake Reference forecast.
Response of the San Jacinto fault zone to static stress changes from the 1992 Landers earthquake M. Nic Bhloscaidh and J. McCloskey School of Environmental.
March 2006 WGCEP Workshop Ruth A. Harris U.S. Geological Survey.
Inherent Mechanism Determining Scaling Properties of Fault Constitutive Laws Mitsuhiro Matsu’ura Department of Earth and Planetary Science Graduate School.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop ALLCAL Steven N. Ward University of California Santa Cruz.
A1 A2 Standard scenario Ground motions are calculated for a standard scenario earthquake. Afterwards, source parameters are varied one by one, and the.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.
Do Now – In Notebooks 1. What is an earthquake? 2. What kind of stress acts on a normal fault? Does the crust lengthen or shorten? 3. What is the difference.
Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network JEAN-PAUL.
Aseismic deformation transients in subduction zone and the role of fault dilatancy -- Numerical simulation in the framework of rate and state friction.
1 Ivan Wong Principal Seismologist/Vice President Seismic Hazards Group, URS Corporation Oakland, CA Uncertainties in Characterizing the Cascadia Subduction.
GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS AT RAPID RESPONSE SITES IN ISTANBUL, TURKEY Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Anibal Ojeda 3, Kuvvet Atakan 1, Mustafa.
Does the Scaling of Strain Energy Release with Event Size Control the Temporal Evolution of Seismicity? Steven C. Jaumé Department of Geology And Environmental.
A Post-Loma Prieta Progress Report on Earthquake Triggering by a Continuum of Deformations Presented By Joan Gomberg.
California Institute of Technology
Dynamic Issues in Fault- to-Fault Jumping David Oglesby UC Riverside UCERF3 Workshop June 11, 2011.
Epistemic uncertainty in California-wide simulations of synthetic seismicity Fred Pollitz, USGS Menlo Park Acknowledgments: David Schwartz, Steve Ward.
Thursday May 9 8:30 am-noon Working Group 4 Convenors: Olsen, Igel, Furumura Macro-scale Simulation Dynamic Rupture and Wave Propagation Innovations in.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland DEM Simulation of dynamic Slip on a rough Fault Steffen Abe, Ivan.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
On constraining dynamic parameters from finite-source rupture models of past earthquakes Mathieu Causse (ISTerre) Luis Dalguer (ETHZ) and Martin Mai (KAUST)
What is characteristic about a characteristic earthquake? Implications from multi-scale studies of the relative earthquake size distribution Stefan Wiemer.
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
Deep Earthquakes.
Shoreline and Hosgri Faults, Central Coast
Presented by Chris Rollins and Voonhui Lai Ge 277 Winter 2016
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
California Institute of Technology
Friction: The rate-and-state constitutive law
學生:林承恩(Cheng-en Lin) 指導老師:陳卉瑄(Kate Huihsuan Chen)
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Earthquakes I-880, Oakland, CA (October 1989).
Geology 15 Fall 2013 Lecture 13 Mid Term I Review Schedule Review
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Key Terms 5.2.
Earthquake Magnitude Ahmed Elgamal
Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Mw 7
by J. Galetzka, D. Melgar, J. F. Genrich, J. Geng, S. Owen, E. O
Presentation transcript:

Southern California Earthquake Center Fault System Behavior Southern California Earthquake Center Annual Meeting September 18, 2000

Themes Earthquakes and criticality Stress triggering Rupture complexity Complexity of earthquake sequences Fault zone fine structure (damage, segmentation)

Accelerating moment release preceded M>6.5 on S.A. system Clustering of intermediate events Effect is clearest for largest events Region size scales with event size Bowman & Sammis

Landers Earthquake Rupture Dynamic Model (Peyrat et al.) Kinematic Model (Wald et al.) Can fit strong motion waveforms with dynamic (spontaneous rupture) model, slip-weakening friction Rupture highly sensitive to prestress “Criticality” condition for rupture growth Connectivity of high prestress regions is key to event size

Landers Strong Motion Waveforms Dynamic Model vs. Recorded (Peyrat et al.)

Accelerating seismicity, complex dynamics of individual earthquakes, both suggest long range correlations in stress field prior to largest events Transition in ground motion modeling: from kinematic to dynamic modeling New questions raised. Require advances in observation, and more advanced numerical models. Examples Nature of fault friction How much does geometrical complexity contribute to rupture complexity and strong motion characteristics? Parametrization of dynamic model-based ground motion simulations?

Fault Zone Trapped Waves Landers (Li et al., 1994) Damage zone dimensions ~100m Wavespeed degradation ~30-50% Fault trace discontinuities associated with waveguide discontinuity at depth

Fault Zone Healing (Li et al., 1998)

Important time-dependent effects recognized Experiments + numerical simulations advanced our understanding of fault zone fine-structure Level and extent of fault-zone damage Persistence of fault discontinuities Important time-dependent effects recognized Poroelasticity? Viscoelasticity? Frictional dynamics?

But wait, . . .there’s more. . . Long-term clustering of large events (E. Mojave) Continuum complexity (frictional dynamics vs. geometrical disorder) Thrust fault dynamics (theory, observation, implications for strong motion) Lab experiments to validate numerical models of rupture