Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Belle Silicon Vertex Detector T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 6 Dec Workshop New Hadrons with Various Flavors 6-7 Dec Nagoya Univ.
Advertisements

LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
K.Eggert/CERN TOTEM Physics  tot elastic scattering diffraction (together with CMS) Karsten Eggert CERN, PH Department on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration.
P. 1Mario Deile – DIS 2004 Mario Deile CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration TOTEM: Forward Physics at the LHC.
April 22, 2006 DIS2006 XIV International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering Tsukuba, Japan, 20-24/April/ TOTEM: Early Diffractive Physics at the.
The CMS and TOTEM diffractive and forward physics program
The TOTEM Experiment at the LHC  Physics program  Detector overview Giuseppe Latino (University of Siena & Pisa INFN) (on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration)
CERN March 2004HERA and the LHC: Diffractive Gap Probability K. Goulianos1 HERA and the LHC K. Goulianos, The Rockefeller University CERN March.
Diffraction at LHC - Experimental set-up Risto Orava University of Helsinki and Helsinki Institute of Physics 0.1 Low-x Workshop Antwerpen R.Orava 17.
Manchester Dec Dynamic Alignment of Roman Pots Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University The Future of Forward Physics at the LHC Manchester,
June 2003 M.Mulders - Fermilab 1 Diffractive results from DØ and prospects for Run II Martijn Mulders Fermilab for the DØ collaboration (with special thanks.
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
Possible measurements with crystals in NA Test of single crystals for the SPS and LHC beam collimation.
Gueorgui ANTCHEVNEC’2013 – Varna, Bulgaria 1 The TOTEM Experiment Consolidation and Upgrade G. Antchev * On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration * INRNE-BAS,
Stefano Lami INFN Pisa on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration.
Jorge Barreto Low_x Prague1 Status of Diffractive Physics at DØ Run II Jorge Barreto Instituto de Física - UFRJ Rio de Janeiro – RJ - Brazil Outline.
1/17 November 2006Walter Scandale H8-RD22 Experiment to test Crystal Collimation for the LHC Walter Scandale CERN For the H8-RD22 collaboration (CERN,
P. 1Mario Deile – Physics at LHC Mario Deile CERN PH-TOT Diffractive Physics: What answers do we expect from the LHC? DinoGoulianos.
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
W. Scandale 1 Status of UA9 Walter Scandale CERN CC09 5 th workshop on crystal channeling March 2009.
Crystal channeling 2009 A. Afonin, IHEP, Protvino New results of use and research of crystals at U-70. A.Afonin, IHEP, Protvino 4- th Crystal channeling.
1 Diffractive physics simulation for LHC Marek Taševský (Physics Inst. Prague) In collaboration with Ch.Royon, A.Kupčo, M.Boonekamp Low-x workshop - Lisbon.
2009 Diffraction at CDF and cross sections at the LHC K. Goulianos1 Diffraction at CDF and cross sections at the LHC K. Goulianos 9-12 Dec 2009.
Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering at RHIC
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment 1.E-09 1.E-06 1.E /T, 1e3/K Current, A (294K) (256K)(227K)(204K) Gennaro Ruggiero,
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto IF – UFRJ/CBPF D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto UFRJ/CBPF - Brazil D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
CERN Jan 2005Alignment of CDF Run II Roman Pots K. Goulianos1 HERA and the LHC K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University CERN January 2005 (talk.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
Diffractive Physics at D0 Kyle Stevenson DIS 2003.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
P. 1K. Eggert – Early TOTEM Running with the  * =90m Optics Karsten Eggert on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Politecnico di Bari and Sezione INFN Bari,
Michael Strang Physics 5391, 22/July/02 Diffraction and the Forward Proton Detector at DØ Michael Strang Physics 5391.
ATLAS-ALFA as a beam instrument Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM and PH-ADO) on behave of the ATLAS-ALFA community LS1 LBOC meeting
Karsten Eggert / PENN State - p. 1 Karsten Eggert CERN / PH Proton Detection at IP3 Enlarge the acceptance for diffractive protons to lower  p/p ~ 10.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
Gennaro Ruggiero CERN, PH Depart. Planar Edgeless Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment On the behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration
Convergence in Proton Reconstruction Algorithm and final reference tests of Roman pots before installation in LHC Ayah Massoud Penn State University Supervisor:
Diffraction at DØ Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington E   Run IRun II Low-x Workshop June 6, 2003 Nafplion, Greece.
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC V. Avati University of Helsinki on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration
CRYSTALS AS LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENT FOR LHC COLLIMATION
The timing upgrade project of the TOTEM Roman Pot detectors
Bending crystals for magnetic and electric dipole moment measurements
Central Detector Pseudo-Rapidity or Rapidity Gaps -- DY = ln (W2/M2X)
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Diffraction and Forward Physics in ATLAS: results and perspectives
Efficiency studies for CRYSTAL experiment in SPS
Recent Results from TOTEM
TOTEM early measurements
TOTEM Results and Perspectives
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
Diffraction at LHC, Tevatron and HERA
Forward (ion-SIDE) Tagging: Motivations, ConCepT, Performance
ATLAS Plans for Elastic Cross-Section and Luminosity Measurement
Performance of a Multigap RPC prototype for the LHCb Muon System
DIFFRACTIVE DIJET PRODUCTION AT CDF
Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward
On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
Status of CMS-PPS timing detectors
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
Double Pomeron Exchange (DPE)
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Results, Status and Perspectives for 2011
Presentation transcript:

Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment Suggestions by V. Avati and K. Eggert Idea: Crystal placed at 6 s from the LHC beam, deflecting the protons, can improve considerably the proton acceptance of the TOTEM Roman pots Principle lay-out Physics example: Higgs search in central diffraction Crystal Collimation in Hadron Storage Rings, CERN 7-8 March 2005

TOTEM ROMAN POT IN CERN SPS BEAM

ROMAN POT DETECTORS and ELECTRONICS TOTEM APV hybrid Flexible connections (In production) beam Readout chip VFAT detector Pitch adapter on detector Test card for VFAT

Detector Distance vs. Beam Detector distance vs. beam is determined by the beam halo. nσ-reach? (RA LHC MAC 13/3/03) ns = dmin/sx,y(z)  10-15 Expected halo rate: 6kHz (for 43 bunches, Np = 1010, eN = 1mm, ns = 10) Active detector starts at the distance d from the physical edge Closest approach : ns = 10 d = 200mm

Elastic Scattering b* = 1540 m acceptance

Double Pomeron Exchange: Example Processes Single Diffraction: X p1 ds/dh proton:p2’ MX2 = x s diffractive system X rapidity gap P Dh =–ln p2’ hmin hmax p2 ln(2pL/pT) Measure leading proton ( x) and rapidity gap ( test gap survival). Double Pomeron Exchange: p1 p2 p2’ p1’ P diffractive system X proton:p2’ proton:p1’ rapidity gap hmin hmax X MX2 = x1 x2 s P Dh2=– ln x2 Dh1=– ln x1 Measure leading protons ( x1, x2) and compare with MX, Dh1, Dh2

Diffractive Higgs Production -jet H gap h p (1-x2)p (1-x1)p MH2 = x1x2 s beam p’ roman pots dipole

Roman Pots in the forward regions y(mm) x(mm) 220m y(mm) x(mm) 420m Dispersion D = 0.08 m D=1.5m x Leading diffractive protons seen at different detector locations (b* = 0.5m)

6 x beam profile with crystal extraction RP stations 6 x beam profile with crystal extraction RP stations Crystal extraction

Hit distribution in the RP detector protons deflected by the crystal the other protons in RP X [m] Y [m] 10 s beam profile Detector edge

Angular distribution in the detector  = 15rad Bent by the crystal (by 0.5 mrad) rad

-acceptance for a Higgs with MH=120 GeV/c2 In Totem acceptance (68% of 1) With cristal extraction 2<1 Totem acceptance with cristal extraction (87% of 1) 

Conclusions Crystal extraction is promising to approach the LHC beams closer than with standard RP detectors Larger acceptance for diffractively produced Higgs Same method could be used for elastic scattered protons to reach the Coulomb region Needs extensive tests with crystals and Roman Pots in the SPS (see talk of Marco Oriunno)