North Country/ Mohawk Regional NTI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
Advertisements

Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Teacher Effectiveness
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Student Learning targets
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Pre-Assessment or Historical Data Student Learning Objectives EngageNY.org © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2013, Teaching and Learning.
New Hope-Solebury School District Effective Educator Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
SLOs for Group/Team, School, BOCES Results
Teacher SLTs
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Huntsville City Schools
Teacher SLTs
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Mastery-Based Learning:
Assessment, Scoring, Recording and Result Analysis
Assessing Writing Module 5 Activity 2.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO)
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
M-Step Overview, Practice and Instructional Implications
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Mapping it Out! Practical Tools to Use Assessment Well
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Targets I can identify elements that need to be revised in SGG drafts.
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Teacher SLTs
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Implementing Race to the Top
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Teacher SLTs
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
May May June Boston
Assessment Literacy: Test Purpose and Use
Student Learning Objectives
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Teacher SLTs
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
TAPTM System Overview Teacher Excellence Student Achievement
Introduction to Extended Reflection 1 Term 1, Development Day 1
Presentation transcript:

North Country/ Mohawk Regional NTI Student Learning Objectives September 19, 2013 Oneida-Herkimer-Madison BOCES EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Agenda Using the SLO Roadmap Rating SLO Quality Using Pre-Assessment or Historical Data Crafting SLOs Using Group or Team, School- or BOCES-Wide Results on State Assessments EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Student Learning Objectives Using the SLO Roadmap Student Learning Objectives EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Accessing Materials Visit engageNY.org EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Accessing Materials Username: nti-user Password: nti2012temp EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Accessing Materials EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Overview EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Background and Basics EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

District Steps: Step 1 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

District Steps: Step 2 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

District Steps: Step 3 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

District Steps: Step 4 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

District Steps: Step 5 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

District Steps: Step 5 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Remainder of Road Map EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Closing How do you envision leveraging the SLO Road Map to support your districts? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Student Learning Objectives Rating SLO Quality Student Learning Objectives EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Annotated SLO Rubric Form Let review some key aspects of the form Purpose Audience Levels Structure Context EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Rubric Rating Individually, use the available information to rate each aspect for each element of the SLO. Provide comments and recommendations reflecting prioritized areas. We will collaborate with colleagues after individually rating the SLO to corroborate and/or refine ratings. EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Debrief What areas did you find in common and not in common with your colleagues? Which areas did you find particularly strong or in need of growing? What are some of the priority aspects you look for in the elements? Which aspects were particularly challenging to rate? How might this inform your training and/or advice to districts or schools? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Closing For the following elements, indicate your typical top priority to look for in rating the element and why: Learning Content Evidence Target(s) HEDI EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Pre-Assessment or Historical Data Student Learning Objectives EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Webinar on EngageNY.org SLO 103 Webinar EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Sample Scenarios US History Regents Grade 8 Science EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Social Studies Standards EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

US History and Government Regents Make-Up Part I: 50 multiple-choice questions Part II: One thematic essay question. Part II: Based on several documents: Part III A: One or more question on each document Part III B: One essay question based on the documents. EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Trend Data: Global and US Regents Scores EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Other Student Data Sources IEP Goals NYSESLAT scores Historical trends on other summative assessments EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Target Setting Set and justify targets for the following students: Student Grade 8 ELA Achievement Level BOCES developed Assessment - English 9 BOCES developed assessment English 10 Global History and Geography Scale Score Student growth target - US History Regents 1 2 55 65 50 3 70 75 4 89 92 85 60 5 6 7 80 90 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Debrief How do your targets compare to those in the webinar? Student Grade 8 ELA Achievement Level BOCES developed Assessment - English 9 BOCES developed assessment English 10 Global History and Geography Scale Score Student growth target - US History Regents 1 2 55 65 50 60 3 70 75 4 89 92 85 5 80 6 7 90 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

MST Standards US History Regents Grade 8 Science EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Grade 8 Science Assessment Make-Up Part I – 45 multiple choice items Part II – 38 open-ended Part III – performance-based portion 3 stations and 3 tasks to be completed Require application of the skills learned EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Trend Data: Grade 7 and 8 Science Scores EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Target Setting Set and justify targets for the following students: Student Grade 7 ELA Grade 7 Math Grade 7 Science Final Grade 8 State Science Target 1 2 3 53 4 70 54 74 5 87 6 88 7 45 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Debrief How do your targets compare to those in the webinar? Student Grade 7 ELA Grade 7 Math Grade 7 Science Final Grade 8 State Science Target 1 2 3 63 65 4 70 75 64 74 5 87 85 6 88 7 45 60 EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Use of Pre-Assessments Where a pre-assessment was used last year, share your reflections on what you coached and/or observed. Successful Pre-assessments Non-Successful Pre-Assessments What was it? Why did it work? Why was it more problematic? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Debrief What are some commonalities among successful pre-assessments? What are some commonalities among non- successful pre-assessments? What could be done to improve the quality of and/or use of pre-assessments? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Historical Data What other data could be used outside of pre- assessment data for SLO development? Consider approaches you coached and/or observed. Responses will be charted. EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Sample Data Take a few minutes to review the sample data set for an SLO being developed for psychology. With colleagues, complete the last two columns. EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Debrief What targets did you set and why? How did each of the pieces of historical data weigh into your decisions? What additional historical data may also be helpful? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Extension We have a sample version of the completed targets that were set. Take some time to reflect on the targets and growth expected of students, particularly in light of the thinking articulated behind the setting of these expectations. What do you think? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Application Take some time to review some sample courses for which it is likely difficult to have a wealth of pre-assessment or historical data. With colleagues, generate recommended data sources teachers of these courses can use in their SLOs – and how. Feel free to add courses to the list. EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Closing What approach will you generally recommend for the element of baseline? Pre-assessment Historical data A blend of the two Why is this your recommendation? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Student Learning Objectives School- or BOCES-Wide, Group or Team Results Based on State Assessments Student Learning Objectives EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Purple Memo Page 1 for Comparable State Growth Webinars District Decision Several Options EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Webinar on EngageNY.org School-wide SLOs Webinar EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Considerations Background Number of students in caseload may fluctuate Length of service may vary Content area focus may vary Result May be difficult to determine which students to include in the SLO May not know if students will remain as part of assignment May not be able to identify by BEDS day which students/classes will require your services EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Possible Solutions: Team SLOs or School-Level SLOs Team or Group SLOs May be an appropriate option when the teacher pushes-in to classes and works alongside classroom teacher(s) School-Level SLOs May be appropriate when the teacher’s efforts impact many students school-wide Teachers’ SLOs will be tied to the performance of students on State assessments EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Sample SLO Review the sample SLO Look for strengths and areas for growth We will share thoughts and questions EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Debrief What strengths did you find in this SLO? What areas for growth did you find? What questions did this SLO raise? What are pros and cons for taking this approach? Other thoughts or questions? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity: Craft an SLO Work with a colleague. Decide on a group of teachers for which to write an SLO using school- or BOCES-wide, group or team results of State assessments Using your local data on State assessments, craft an SLO. Remember the importance of the rationale for why the teachers are included We will share out the SLOs EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Activity Debrief Let’s share our SLOs! Remaining thoughts or questions? EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center

Closing For which teacher groups might you recommend an “attribution” SLO and why? How would you recommend a HEDI be structure for this type of SLO using State assessments EngageNY.org © 2013, Teaching and Learning Solutions © 2013, Community Training and Assistance Center