Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies Christos A Venetis, Stamatis P Papadopoulos, Rudi Campo, Stephan Gordts, Basil C Tarlatzis, Grigoris F Grimbizis Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 665-683 (December 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006 Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of search and retrieval of studies. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2014 29, 665-683DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Forest plots for relative risk of pregnancy achievement between women with and without congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) in: (a) natural cycles (spontaneous conception); (b) assisted reproductive techniques cycles and (c) natural cycles and assisted reproductive techniques cycles combined. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2014 29, 665-683DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Forest plots for relative risk of (a) first-trimester spontaneous abortion; (b) second-trimester spontaneous abortion; and (c) first-trimester, second-trimester spontaneous abortion, or both, when all the available data for congenital uterine anomalies are pooled. CUA, congenital uterine anomalies. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2014 29, 665-683DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Forest plots for the effect of hysteroscopic resection of a septum on the probability of (a) pregnancy achievement; (b) spontaneous abortion; and (c) preterm labour (<37 weeks). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2014 29, 665-683DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions