Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proactive Interventions: Incorporating a Children’s Rights Approach
Advertisements

Article XXXVI – Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession 1. – This Protocol shall be open for signature in Berlin on 9 March 2012 by.
Copyright in Saudi Arabia Royal Decree M/11 - Copyright protection to works first published in Saudi Arabia or whose author is a Saudi Arabian national.
University of Maastricht January 17, 2014 Phasing Out Copyright Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
The Marrakesh Treaty: a webinar for libraries EIFL webinar, 14 January 2015.
Intellectual Property Department, Hong Kong SAR Government1 WIPO Regional Symposium 16 March 2004 Copyright Issues for Educational Institutions and Libraries.
Software Protection & Scope of the Right holder Options for Developing Countries Presentation by: Dr. Ahmed El Saghir Judge at the Council of State Courts.
Changes to copyright exceptions for libraries and archives Robin Stout Copyright Policy Intellectual Property Office.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA AN OVERVIEW OF PATENT PROTECTION IN ZAMBIA.
TRIPS and IP-Related Matters Mauritius, 5 March 2014 Mauritius Copyright Legislation and TRIPS Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam.
WIPO Copyright Sector 1.  Fundamental or constitutional rights or public interest: freedom of speech, access to information, right for education, enjoyment.
Copyright dilemma: Access right over databases of raw information? Gemma Minero, Lecturer in Law, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Re – use of PSI in Slovenia Kristina Kotnik Šumah Deputy of the Information Commisoner.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
Diplomatic Conference on the Protection of Audiovisual Performances ALAI Study Day Amsterdam May Paolo Lanteri Assistant Legal Officer, Copyright.
1 CUTS International Capacity Building Training Programme on Advance IPR, WTO-Related Issues and Patent Writing April 28-May 02, 2008, Jaipur Session 10.
Copyright law and its Nexus with Education: A Critique Manasa Reddy Gummi.
The Doha Declaration and the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement Islamabad, 28 November 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
BLACA - IPI seminar 5 October th anniversary of the Rome Convention Bird & Bird.
1 Wizards of OS 3 The Future of the Digital Commons Berlin - June 10 to 12, 2004 International Copyright in the Digital Era Geidy Lung WIPO Copyright Law.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
NEGOTIATING TRADE FACILITATION Kennedy Mbekeani UNDP, RSC.
© A. Kur IP in Transition – Proposals for Amendment of TRIPS Annette Kur, MPI Munich.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
International Protection of Copyright and Related Rights Jørgen Savy Blomqvist Director, Copyright Law Division.
Copyright Limitations and Exceptions in International Treaties and Beyond: Developing Countries and Access to Knowledge Geidy Lung, WIPO Copyright Law.
American University Washington, 10 June 2014 Marrakesh Treaty – Ceiling or Window to Open Sky? Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird.
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)
Reform(aliz)ing Copyright BCLT, April 18-19, 2013 Three Steps Towards Formalities Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
Extended Collective Licensing Models and Practices World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Ministry of Culture and National Heritage Warsaw, March.
AU Washington, PIJIP 12 September 2012 Fair Use and Fair Dealing: A European Perspective Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird,
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
WORKSHOP ON COPYRIGHT – COLLECTIVE MANAGEMENT INT MARKT IND/EXP organized in co-operation with the Ministry of Culture of the former Yugoslav Republic.
Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL)
Michele Woods Director Copyright Law Division
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status
Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam
NWE Day-Ahead Price Coupling
Accessible Books Consortium Implementing the objectives of the Marrakesh Treaty at a practical level Presentation to Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries.
(MVT or Marrakesh VIP Treaty, 2013)
Experiences in the Cross Border Exchange of Accessible Format Copies A Canadian Authorized Entity’s experience Presentation to Sub-Regional Meeting for.
IP Protection under the WTO
MARRAKESH TREATY INDIAN PERSPECTIVE
IPR in FP7 Bart Janse DG Research A.2.
The Role of Authorized Entities before and after Marrakesh Treaty implementation Presentation to Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh.
Caroline Morgan, CEO of IFRRO Malaysian National Seminar
The Promotion and the Implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty into National Legislation Thailand.
The role of Authorised Entity
Documentaries, UPF, 19 April 2018
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED ENTITIES
Christoph Spennemann, Legal Expert
International Copyright Legal Framework
Introduction to the Marrakesh Treaty: from a Development Perspective
IAPP TRUSTe SYMPOSIUM 9-11 JUNE 2004
Functional immunity (only for official acts)
Accessible Books Consortium Implementing the objectives of the Marrakesh Treaty at a practical level Presentation to Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries.
The Marrakesh Treaty in a Nutshell
The Role of Authorized Entities before and after Marrakesh Treaty implementation Presentation to Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh.
Experiences in the Cross Border Exchange of Accessible Format Copies A Canadian Authorized Entity’s experience Presentation to Sub-Regional Meeting for.
Books Beyond Our Boarders
European Company Law Dorota Wieczorkowska
Making South Africa a Global Leader
Principles for Positive Proposals in Articles 1 and 4 of the TPP
SIMPLIFIED MEASURES FOR CUSTOMER’S IDENTIFICATION
Comparative L&Es in Copyright Singapore, 22 July Copyright L&Es Treaty
Copyright Exceptions for Archives: A Typology Analysis
(MVT or Marrakesh VIP Treaty, 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Singapore, November 1 to 3, 2017 Substantive Provisions of the Marrakesh Treaty (Part II) A presentation by: G.R.Raghavender Joint Secretary Department of Justice Ministry of Law and Justice Government of India

WIPO Diplomatic Conference on Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities at Marrakesh, Morocco June 17 to 28, 2013

Article 2- Definitions works -Article 2(1) of the Berne Convention -in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations, - published or otherwise made publicly available in any media- audio books – but not cinematograph films; “accessible format copy” “authorized entity” means an entity that is authorized or recognized by the government -non-profit basis / government institution or non-profit organization - its primary activities or institutional obligations. Article 3 - Beneficiary Persons

Article 4 - National Law Limitations and Exceptions 1. Rights: ‘Shall’ provide- the right of reproduction, the right of distribution, and the right of making available to the public ‘May’ provide - right of public performance the right of translation(Berne Convention) 2. Who are permitted: Authorized entities permitted with conditions beneficiary person or someone acting on his or her behalf including a primary caretaker or caregiver, 3. Basis: pursuant to Articles 10 and 11 4. Commercial availability: ‘may confine’- cannot be obtained commercially under reasonable terms for beneficiary persons in that market – notify with DG,WIPO 5. Remuneration.

Article 5(1) : Cross-Border Exchange of Accessible Format Copies Contracting Parties shall provide that if an accessible format copy is made under a limitation or exception or pursuant to operation of law, that accessible format copy may be distributed or made available by an authorized entity to a beneficiary person or an authorized entity in another Contracting Party. domestic copyright law of a Contracting Party must allow an authorized entity to export provides Contracting Parties with flexibility on how to implement this obligation  Agreed statement concerning Article 5(1): It is further understood that nothing in this Treaty reduces or extends the scope of exclusive rights under any other treaty.

Article 5: Cross-Border Exchange of Accessible Format Copies Article 5 (2) authorized entities -to distribute or make available for the exclusive use of beneficiary persons accessible format copies to (a) an authorized entity in another Contracting Party; and (b) a beneficiary person in another Contracting Party; originating authorized entity did not know or have reasonable grounds to know that the accessible format copy would be used for other than beneficiary persons. Agreed statement concerning Article 5(2): it may be appropriate for an authorized entity to apply further measures to confirm that the person it is serving is a beneficiary person and to follow its own practices as described in Article 2. it would be optional for authorized entities to decide whether “to apply further measures,” in addition to those it employs in the domestic context, to confirm the beneficiary status of a person it is serving in another country. an authorized entity’s decision not to apply further measures should not constitute reasonable grounds for it to know that the accessible format copies would be used by non-beneficiaries

Cross-Border Exchange - commercial availability commercial availability - most controversial clause - excluded The main problem to be tackled is availability of technology. Technologically advanced developed nations have the capability to convert works into various formats, whereas the developing nations may not have the same capabilities. trade off to delete of commercial availability under Article 5 and include limitations or exceptions to right to translation as an agreed statement. This is giant step for ensuring access to beneficiaries. Treaty text uses the word ‘may’ and gives an impression that this provision is non-mandatory, limit cross border exchange only to books that are not commercially available in the exporting nation?

Article 5 (4): ‘Berne Gap’ or ‘3 step-test gap’ During the special SCCR held from 18 to 20, April, 2013 Japan and the US expressed their apprehension – non Berne/TRIPS members; over providing accessible format copies under cross border exchange to beneficiaries or authorised entities of these countries ; how to ensure their accountability to implement 3 step test be made applicable when they enjoy under this treaty. the issue was addressed in Article 5(4). While drafting the text, member states made it sure that inclusion of such Para under this Treaty will not mandate any further amendment to its domestic legislation.

Article 6: Importation of Accessible Format Copies Article 6: To the extent that the national law permit a beneficiary person, someone acting on his or her behalf, or an authorized entity, to make an accessible format copy of a work, permit them to import an accessible format copy for the benefit of beneficiary persons, without the authorization of the rightholder. Similar to Article 5 , Article 6 obligates Contracting Parties to allow authorized entities or beneficiary persons to import accessible format copies from other Contracting Parties. If national law permitted authorized entities only, but not beneficiary persons, to make accessible format copies, under Article 6 that Contracting Party would only be required to permit authorized entities to import accessible format copies.    Agreed statement concerning Article 6:  the same flexibilities set out in Article 4 when implementing their obligations under Article 6.

Other Articles Article 7 - Obligations Concerning Technological Measures – WCT flexibilities - Agreed statement- national practices Article 8 - Respect for Privacy Article 9 - Cooperation to Facilitate Cross-Border Exchange Article 10 - General Principles on Implementation - flexibility to implement- no amendments to national law - extended to related rights other limitations or exceptions, or a combination thereof, within their national legal system and practice Include judicial, administrative or regulatory determinations for the benefit of beneficiary persons as to fair practices, dealings or uses to meet their needs consistent with the Contracting Parties’ rights and obligations under the Berne Convention, other international treaties, and Article 11,

Other Articles Article 11 - General Obligations on Limitations and Exceptions Berne (Art.9.2); TRIPS (Art.13); and WCT (Art 10.2 Article 12 - Other Limitations and Exceptions - economic situation, and its social and cultural needs, in conformity with that Contracting Party's international rights and obligations, and in the case of a least-developed country taking into account its special needs and its particular international rights and obligations and flexibilities thereof; - This Treaty is without prejudice to other limitations and exceptions for persons with disabilities provided by national law.

The Copyright Act, 1957 Section 52(1) (zb) the adaptation, reproduction, issue of copies or communication to the public of any work in any accessible format, by- any person to facilitate persons with disability to access to works including sharing with any person with disability Accessible format for private or personal use, educational purpose or research; or any organisation working for the benefit of the persons with disabilities in case the normal format prevents the enjoyment of such works by such persons: copies of the works in such accessible format are made available to the persons with disabilities on a non-profit basis but to recover only the cost of production: ensure that the copies of works in such accessible format are used only by persons with disabilities and takes reasonable steps to prevent its entry into ordinary channels of business. Section 52 (2) - Translation

Compulsory licence for benefit of disabled Any person working for the benefit of persons with disability on a profit basis or for business may apply to the Copyright Board. Every compulsory licence issued under this section shall specify – the means and format of publication, the period during which the compulsory licence may be exercised and, in the case of issue of copies, the number of copies that may be issued including the rate or royalty:

THANKS