Downtown Recycling: Consensus Building & Behavior Change

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WAUKESHA COUNTY RECYCLING Waukesha County Department of Parks & Land Use.
Advertisements

University Of Utah Enhanced Recycling Program. Why Recycle? Environmental Stewardship Environmental Stewardship Sustainability Leadership Sustainability.
Albuquerque Recycling Now & In the Future Mayor Martin J. Chávez __ Ed Adams, P.E., Chief Administrative Officer Irene García, Chief Operations Officer.
Rural Waste Collection Options Department of Budget and Management 01/21/2014.
City of Loveland Solid Waste Division Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs Diversion Versus Disposal: Determining the Costs.
Westford’s Current Solid Waste Program Total costs in FY10 : $1.56 million Trash collection contract with ACME Waste Systems until August 2010 at annual.
City of Fort Collins Department of Natural Resources The Role of Solid Waste Reduction Programs in Climate Protection Plans Annual Conference of Colorado.
Basic Steps To Creating A Campus Integrated Waste Management Program
California Integrated Waste Management Board March 16, 2004 San Jose, CA City of San Jose Diversion Programs.
IT’S OUR L.A. KEEP IT CLEAN California Integrated Waste Management Board June 12, 2007 Presented by: Councilmember Ed Reyes City of Los Angeles LA River.
Feasibility of a Pay-As-You-Throw Program for West Lafayette West Lafayette Go Greener Commission.
2013 CASBO ANNUAL CONFERENCE & SCHOOL BUSINESS EXPO Recycling & Reducing Trash Fees APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA These materials have been prepared.
Fayetteville adopted a goal of a 80% Diversion rate with resolution Resolution passed with an 8-0 Council vote – Tons of waste to.
Curbside Recycling: Home. Work. Play. Kate Bailey, June 2016.
Jurisdictional Teamwork. Utilization of Resources Effective Communication Education & Outreach Jurisdictional Teamwork.
Libros for Oregon Preliminary Survey Results
Solid Waste Proposal Options Council Workshop March 5, 2014.
FOOD ISN’T GARBAGE Metro Vancouver’s Organics Disposal Ban Simon Fraser University January 20, 2015.
Variable Rate Options. A unit pricing system where the resident pays a variable rate based upon how much refuse they place for collection. A unit pricing.
Operational Features of Pay As You Throw
Why is environmental sustainability important to the University?
Portsmouth Solid Waste Disposal Critical Decisions
Developing Community Assessments
Pay-as-You-Throw for Kingston MA
Fitchburg’s PAYT Program Thursday, May 2, 2013
Strategic Planning When Engineers and Planners Work Together
Michele Bromley Adaptive Technology Specialist
Tracking, Measurement and Analysis
Comcast’s Internet Essentials Program: Bridging the Digital Divide
City and County of Broomfield Solid Waste Task Force
Assessing the Shelburne Falls Collaborative Composting Program A Program Administered by: Shelburne Falls Area Business Association (SFABA) Regionalization.
Recycling Contamination
Mandatory Recycling and Composting: The San Francisco Experience of Driving Participation in Multifamily Dwellings Agenda: Background on San Francisco.
Cultural and Linguistic Competency
Do you want to be involved?
City of Durham Solid Waste Management
Trends in Virginia's Community Health Needs Assessments
The Women’s Council of REALTORS® Chapter-to-Network Project
San Antonio’s Recycling and Resource Recovery Plan
Customer Centric Organizations
UCO Career Development Center:
Business Retention and Expansion
Business Modeling Week 5.
Iowa State University provides education that benefits many and is available to even more because we work together as a system – Iowa State University.
MONMOUTH COUNTY SINGLE STREAM RECYCLING
CTC - Promoting Youth Health and Well-Being in Franklin County & North Quabbin; Prevention of Youth Substance Use & Promotion of Nutrition & Physical.
California Resource Recovery Association
©2012 William Blackburn Consulting, Ltd.
HOLDING SLIDE.
St. Mary’s General Hospital Orientation
Iowa State University provides education that benefits many and is available to even more because we work together as a system – Iowa State University.
F2F M&E System Opportunities for Improvement
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Structures for Implementation
Designed for internal training use:
Sustainability-based Analytics
Partnership Collections
Jill Bartolotta and Sue Bixler Educators
Welcome to Your Child’s Seat. Thank you for coming today.
A3 – Improving State Level Supports and Stakeholder Engagement through Effective Evaluation Kim Gulbrandson, Justyn Poulos – Wisconsin RtI Center Key.
Data Quality 101: What is Data Quality
RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
Request for Proposals Q&A Webcast - February 2009
Expectation Project Focus Group and Club Liaison Surveys
Foster Carer Retention Project Michelle Galbraith Project Manager
October 11, 2011 City Council Meeting Robert Layton City Manager
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
USING THE ONLINE LEARNING CENTER TO SUPPORT CLUBS
A Note to Facilitators Dear Facilitator, Thank you for using Rural PREP’s materials to create an active learning experience for your site. Use this slide.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

Downtown Recycling: Consensus Building & Behavior Change Case study of innovative program focusing on main themes for today: -upstream, downstream, & consumption---recycling, food waste recycling, and waste reduction -developing a zero waste plan---informal way to reach 0 waste -incentives;---more of disincentive -began in April 2008, before very tough economic times hit---able to continue with this because of the careful planning involved -measuring success---data gathering and reporting Rachael Budowle Community Programs Coordinator Office of Waste Reduction & Recycling Virginia Recycling Association Conference May 6, 2009

Blacksburg Southwest Virginia Virginia Tech Curbside collection for single family homes MRSWA -size, population -college town, effective partnerships with Virginia Tech and particular departments/centers for programs -curbside collection for refuse & recycling, once a week, for all single family homes -embedded recycling fee, flat rate user fee -don’t have own fleet, currently contract with WM—manual recycling, auto trash -all materials go to MRSWA…very effective partnership, recently began accepting dual stream recycling including mixed paper

Community Programs Schools Apartments Fluorescent Lamps Reusable Bags Organics Recycling Businesses Downtown Recycling Intro that beyond that residential program (only way to reach zero waste), other programs are focused on outreach and doing very things that are highlighted here (convincing senior management and others---decision makers), measuring and reporting on programs, incentives, education, upstream and downstream programs Run through each briefly with emphasis on Downtown Recycling as focus of talk

Sustainable Blacksburg Community Partnership Sustainability Week Focused projects Downtown Recycling & Refuse Program -SB catalyst behind DTR -click link (notice full recommendations online) -formed with EPA grant, now non-profit organization---involvement of VT, Town, business, and citizens -main focus has been Sustainability Week -now as a non-profit, beginning to take on focused projects in community---first is Downtown Recycling & Refuse Program

Downtown Recycling & Refuse Plan Sustainable Blacksburg led initiative Study group formed SB members, solid waste professionals, citizens, merchants Core group Steps to recommendation: Map Survey Interviews with solid waste professionals in similar communities -though we are involved in the project, this was something SB proposed and initiated. First task was to form a Downtown Recycling Study group consisting of SB members, town solid was professionals, citizens, and most importantly---merchants in the downtown. This is very helpful when convincing senior management (another focus of this workshop)—merchants association and town council---buy in is largely already there. -from the very beginning, all relevant stakeholders were at the table, and no set plan was devised---everyone discussed problems and potential for an organized recycling program downtown -small core group of SB & town employees working on nuts and bolts in between larger group meetings---this model is already being used to address other sustainability issues! -low cost way to address an issue that we have wanted to address for a long time

Field audit of all businesses---categorized by type to determine what kind of waste materials generated Helped us conceptualize locations for potential planning of a hauling route

Survey & Interviews Effective partnership with Center for Applied Behavior Systems at Virginia Tech ~100 businesses approached, 68 responded Very few recycling; 25% or less for most materials, though significantly more for cardboard Variety of methods for refuse management 47% offered recommendations for recycling downtown; 91% of those supportive of a uniform, Town-managed program Interviewed Charlottesville, Roanoke, Raleigh, & Orange Co., NC -in person survey, students were well-trained research assistants---important for us to do accurate data gathering, first step in successful measure and reporting of the program (other volunteers helped with this, so it is possible to do these kinds of surveys without the university partnership) -describe survey: methods of recycling/refuse management, haulers, receptacles used, cost, frequency, indoor and outdoor space available -cardboard 57% Thoughts confirmed that recycling is minimal, refuse management disorganized, and that merchants were eager to address---need data! Don’t make assumptions and report---confirm assumptions -only include one line here, but interviews with solid waste professionals in other similar communities were incredibly important! So thanks to any of you here who were a part of that. In depth questions about how programs are managed (fee structure, manual vs. automatic pickup, receptacle type, frequency and time of collection, feedback, etc.) -other are making this work/have advice—don’t reinvent the wheel! Could pick and choose what from these might work well in Blacksburg

Reporting: Recommendations Establish mandatory, uniform recycling and refuse program for all downtown businesses Town-managed Curbside (front or back door/alley collection) Pay As You Throw for refuse Supplemental recommendations Pedestrian recycling receptacles Food waste diversion Later expansion to all businesses Reported to: Downtown Recycling Study Group Sustainable Blacksburg Downtown Merchants of Blacksburg Blacksburg Town Council PAYT one of the most important aspects of the plan Approved across the board! Encouragement from town council to recommend specific operational components of plan

Pay As You Throw + - Disincentive for refuse Weight vs. Volume Refer to EPA’s website as resource -not actually an incentive, but ERB based on consequences---disincentive for trash disposal (indirect incentive to recycle) -will address reduction in next slide + - Decreased refuse tonnage Increased recycling tonnage/diversion rate Economic sustainability Equity If properly structured, can encourage source reduction as well Reflects “true” costs of refuse Can be politically unpopular Encourages illegal dumping May not encourage source reduction Weight technology costly

Implementation Plan Material & container type Collection and storage location Collection frequency Collection time PAYT fee structure integral to plan Volume Plan that simultaneously encourages increased recycling and waste reduction (diversion rate) -put everything to work that we’ve learned—value of measurement and reporting -MP, Commingles, Organics -things that are amenable to businesses and pedestrians alike, well organized to manage -why volume instead of weight -review plan A, B, C (C is most common) -fee structure to support source reduction

Thank You! Rachael Budowle rbudowle@blacksburg.gov (540) 961-1806 www.blacksburg.gov/recycling -put everything to work that we’ve learned—value of measurement and reporting -MP, Commingles, Organics -things that are amenable to businesses and pedestrians alike, well organized to manage -why volume instead of weight -review plan A, B, C (C is most common) - Why volume as opposed to weight