Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 772-786 (November 2017) What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review Tamsin Drake, Nikolaos Grivas, Saeed Dabestani, Thomas Knoll, Thomas Lam, Steven Maclennan, Ales Petrik, Andreas Skolarikos, Michael Straub, Christian Tuerk, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Kemal Sarica European Urology Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 772-786 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016 Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Forest plot (stone free rate of included intergroup studies). CI=confidence interval; NRS=nonrandomised studies; QRCT=quasi-randomised controlled trial; RCT=randomised controlled trial; SWL=shock wave lithotripsy; URS=ureteroscopy. European Urology 2017 72, 772-786DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016) Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Forest plot (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3 reported complications in intergroup studies).CI=confidence interval; NRS=nonrandomised studies; QRCT=quasi-randomised controlled trial; RCT=randomised controlled trial; SWL=shock wave lithotripsy; URS=ureteroscopy. European Urology 2017 72, 772-786DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016) Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions