Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Innovative Data Management and Planning Strategies for TMDL Compliance
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
DC’s Phase III WIP: Targeting, Engaging and Leveraging
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Funding from the Local Perspective
Local Planning Process…
Chesapeake Bay Program
Watershed Implementation Plan
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
Appendix C New Administration General Assembly Session
GIS Data Management for SHA’s Bay Restoration Program
Funding from the Local Perspective
Funding from the Local Perspective
Water Quality Credit Trading
Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Commonwealth of Virginia
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Funding from the Local Perspective
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Approach to Setting Local Planning Goals
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP Introductory Webinar for Federal Facilities Located in the District of Columbia May 24, 2018

Chesapeake Bay TMDL, WIPs and Federal Facilities Katherine Antos Branch Chief Partnering & Environmental Conservation Branch Department of Energy & Environment @DOEE_DC

Source: Chesapeake Bay Program Office 3 @DOEE_DC

Bay TMDL Adaptive Management Framework Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 4 @DOEE_DC

Nitrogen Phosphorus ~90% load wastewater Approaching E3 Wastewater flow and load will increase over time Phosphorus Dual function of city and state Over 90% load from wastewater Virtually all load covered by BP and MS4 permits Largely built out. CBP estimates 89% of growth by 2025 will be infill; we think it’s higher Growth improves water quality TREE CANOPY: Mayoral mandate for 40% Canopy Cover by 2032,  - 2011: 35%. currently 39% New MS4 permit: 33,525 trees in MS4 in next 5 years (6,705 per year) DDOT is primary tree planting agency (~80%), DOEE awards & manages tree-planting grants (non-profits) What are the unique characteristics of your jurisdiction as it relates to the challenge of effectively engaging local governments in your Phase III WIP development?  For example,  What is the relative importance of local government in achieving pollutant reduction targets in your jurisdiction? What do you need from local governments during WIP development and implementation? What information do local government officials and staff need to be effective partners in WIP development? Implementation? What is your timeline for communication and engagement? Enter jurisdiction name 5 @DOEE_DC

Nitrogen Phosphorus ~90% load wastewater Approaching E3 Wastewater flow and load will increase over time Phosphorus Dual function of city and state Over 90% load from wastewater Virtually all load covered by BP and MS4 permits Largely built out. CBP estimates 89% of growth by 2025 will be infill; we think it’s higher Growth improves water quality TREE CANOPY: Mayoral mandate for 40% Canopy Cover by 2032,  - 2011: 35%. currently 39% New MS4 permit: 33,525 trees in MS4 in next 5 years (6,705 per year) DDOT is primary tree planting agency (~80%), DOEE awards & manages tree-planting grants (non-profits) What are the unique characteristics of your jurisdiction as it relates to the challenge of effectively engaging local governments in your Phase III WIP development?  For example,  What is the relative importance of local government in achieving pollutant reduction targets in your jurisdiction? What do you need from local governments during WIP development and implementation? What information do local government officials and staff need to be effective partners in WIP development? Implementation? What is your timeline for communication and engagement? Enter jurisdiction name 6 @DOEE_DC

Nitrogen Phosphorus ~90% load wastewater Approaching E3 Wastewater flow and load will increase over time Phosphorus Dual function of city and state Over 90% load from wastewater Virtually all load covered by BP and MS4 permits Largely built out. CBP estimates 89% of growth by 2025 will be infill; we think it’s higher Growth improves water quality TREE CANOPY: Mayoral mandate for 40% Canopy Cover by 2032,  - 2011: 35%. currently 39% New MS4 permit: 33,525 trees in MS4 in next 5 years (6,705 per year) DDOT is primary tree planting agency (~80%), DOEE awards & manages tree-planting grants (non-profits) What are the unique characteristics of your jurisdiction as it relates to the challenge of effectively engaging local governments in your Phase III WIP development?  For example,  What is the relative importance of local government in achieving pollutant reduction targets in your jurisdiction? What do you need from local governments during WIP development and implementation? What information do local government officials and staff need to be effective partners in WIP development? Implementation? What is your timeline for communication and engagement? Enter jurisdiction name 7 @DOEE_DC

8 @DOEE_DC

Bottom Line District cannot achieve planning targets without federal facilities EPA expects federal facilities to participate in Phase III WIP development Today’s webinar and May 31 training kickoff process for coordination between DOEE and federal facilities within the District to develop Phase III WIP by March 1, 2019 (draft) and June 28, 2019 (final) 9 @DOEE_DC

Expectations for Federal Facilities Greg Allen Chesapeake Bay Program Office @DOEE_DC

Federal Facility Planning Targets Jeff Sweeney Chesapeake Bay Program Office @DOEE_DC

What is C.A.S.T.? Jeff Sweeney (CBPO) Aaron Waters (DOEE) @DOEE_DC

Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool (CAST) is a web-based nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment load estimator tool that streamlines environmental planning. Users specify a geographical area, and then select Best Management Practices (BMPs) to apply on that area. CAST builds the scenario and provides estimates of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment load reductions. 13 @DOEE_DC

Step One Step Two Source: cast.chesapeakebay.net 14 @DOEE_DC

The District of Columbia’s Stormwater Database (SWDB) Matthew Espie SWDB Administrator Department of Energy & Environment @DOEE_DC

Stormwater Database The Stormwater Database (http://doee.dc.gov/swdb) is the District’s tool to track and report on BMPs in the District All regulated and voluntary BMPs should be submitted to the Stormwater Database DOEE exports NEIEN-compliant XML to report all BMPs in the District, and can filter for federal BMPs 16 @DOEE_DC

Process to submit to the Stormwater Database Regulated BMPs Project Engineer Submit Stormwater Management Plan, including BMP data Person Responsible for Maintenance Signs Agreement to maintain the project DOEE approves Stormwater Management Plan Project is built. DOEE Final Construction Inspection “activates” BMPs within the database for reporting Voluntary BMPs Stormwater Management Plan may be submitted for approval prior to construction BMP is built BMP data is submitted to DOEE on spreadsheet template (unless a Stormwater Management Plan was submitted) DOEE uploads data to the database (unless a Stormwater Management Plan was submitted) 17 @DOEE_DC

When is a BMP regulated? Major Land Disturbing Activity: At least 5,000 square feet of land disturbance Major Substantial Improvement Activity: Renovation for which the cost is at 50% of the pre-project assessed value Combined footprint of structure and land disturbance is at least 5,000 square feet 18 @DOEE_DC

Next Steps Aaron Waters @DOEE_DC

Important Dates Register for CAST (cast.chesapeakebay.net) Register for SWDB (http://doee.dc.gov/swdb) Attend Training on May 31st, 2018 at DOEE Comments on Planning Targets due by June 29th, 2018 Check-ins with DOEE: August 31st, 2018: Review 1st draft scenario November 30th, 2018: Review 2nd Draft of Scenario January 15th, 2019: Review Final Draft of Scenario 20 @DOEE_DC

Questions? Katherine Antos Greg Allen, Ph.D. Jeff Sweeney Aaron Waters Branch Chief katherine.antos@dc.gov (202) 574-7606 Aaron Waters Chesapeake Bay and Regulatory Program Specialist aaron.waters@dc.gov (202)535-2239 Luke Cole Chesapeake Bay Data Coordinator luke.cole@dc.gov (202) 724-5348 Matthew Espie SWDB Administrator Matthew.Espie@dc.gov (202) 715-7644 Greg Allen, Ph.D. allen.greg@epa.gov 410-267-5746 Jeff Sweeney jsweeney@chesapeakebay.net 410-267-9844 Renee Thompson rthompso@chesapeakebay.net Olivia Devereaux olivia@devereuxconsulting.com 301-325-7449

Preliminary Federal Facility Planning Targets 22 @DOEE_DC