HLPs and Practice Based Teacher Education: Why? What? How?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Advertisements

Purpose of Instruction
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Using Evidence Based Practices to Reform Teacher and Leader Education: Useful Tools and Resources in Action U.S. Department of Education, H325A
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
CEEDAR Cross State Convening Overview: Innovation Configurations Course Enhancement Modules H325A
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Partnerships and Change Strategies for Ensuring High Quality, Clinical Placements that Promote Teacher and Leader Collaboration Collaboration for Effective.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Reflections from a Teacher Educator Benjamin Lignugaris/Kraft Utah State University.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
Dr. Marty Hougen, CEEDAR Center
Teacher Education Division Conference Tempe, AZ November 6, 2015
U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003
Stephanie L. Craig, M.Ed. University of Kansas
Missouri Breakout Session
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Leaders for All Learners: Reforming Leadership Preparation in Oregon
Georgia State University
U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003
Exceptional Education Department
Cross-Institutional Collaboration for Sustainability
Guidance on Construction
Department of Lifespan Development & Education Sciences
Snaptutorial ESE 697 Help Bcome Exceptional/ snaptutorial.com
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
HLPs High Leverage Practices as a Tool for Teaching and Teacher Education CEEDAR/IRIS Convening H325A
Practice-Based Approaches to Improving Teacher Education
Improving Teaching Practices through the Use of Video-Case Analysis
Sharpening Instruction Through High Leverage Practices
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Practice-Based Approaches to Improving Teacher Education
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Hello. Welcome to “What Does it Really Take
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
How are HLPs used? Components of HLP identified.
Purposeful Literacy Leadership for Administrators: Start a Movement
High-Leverage Practices
How Shall we prepare teachers for deeper community partnerships?
Improving your instruction: High leverage practices that work!
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
The Wicked Problem of Measuring the Impact of Teacher Preparation: Increasing Rigor in Documenting Preparation Practices Larry Maheady, Buffalo State University.
NJCU College of Education
Lesson study: A practice-based approach for increasing preservice teachers’ instructional and collaborative skill for inclusive teaching.
Ohio Dean’s Compact Meeting September 14, 2018 ceedar.org
Some Considerations for Developing & Implementing Clinical Experiences
Mary T. Brownell, Director
Integrating Practice and coursework
Ohio Dean’s Compact Conference January 23-25, 2019 ceedar.org
High-Leverage Practices in Special Education
The Heart of Student Success
Ohio Presentation Building Ohio’s Community of Practice to Meet the Needs of All Learners.
Integrating Quality Practice-based Opportunities within Campus-based Coursework and Field Experiences H325A
Essential Questions How can states, districts, and educator preparation programs work together to ensure equitable outcomes for diverse learners? What.
Multiple background possibilities
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

HLPs and Practice Based Teacher Education: Why? What? How? James McLeskey Presentation at the University of Memphis Memphis, TN October 20, 2017 H325A120003

Disclaimer This content was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Award No. H325A120003. Bonnie Jones and David Guardino serve as the project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or polices of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service, or enterprise mentioned in this website is intended or should be inferred.

Agenda Why High Leverage Practices and Practice Based Teacher Education? What are HLPs for K-12 SPE teachers? How are HLPs integrated into teacher preparation?

Why? Less than desirable student outcomes Research on development of expertise Current structure and content of teacher preparation programs

Student Outcomes Outcomes for students with disabilities and many students who struggle in school are less than desirable Best way to address this is to improve teacher practice

Student Outcomes Effective practices have been identified to improve student outcomes Graduates of preparation programs do not often use these practices in their classrooms

Student Outcomes The question--Can teacher preparation better prepare candidates to use effective practices?

How do professionals develop expertise? Learn from other professions Development of expertise Anders Ericsson—Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise (Ericsson & Pool, 2016)

Professions have in common Step 1--identify essential practices Step 2—systematically train novices to use these practices before entering the profession Can’t develop expertise unless identify essential practices. Most professions identify specific essential practices. Must be able to perform before entering the profession.

Learning from Other Professions Plumber Airline Pilot Physician Nurse Cosmetologist All have routines of practice that they are trained to do before entering the profession.

Step 1—Identify Essential Practices--Pilots Conduct pre-flight inspection Perform normal and cross-wind approaches and landings Execute straight turns and climbing turns Perform effective visual scanning Avoid a runway incursion AND SO FORTH Can’t develop expertise unless essential practices are explicitly identified. Must be able to perform these practices before entering the profession. These are routines of practice.

Step 2—Gaining Expertise Not gained by reading or talking about practices Gained through well-structured opportunities to practice particular skills in authentic settings with support and feedback Complex practices across professions are not learned by simply reading about them in a book or listening to someone talk about the practice or watching a video with someone using the practice. Rather, expertise in professions is gained through well-structured opportunities to practice particular skills in authentic settings with support and feedback.

Expertise Opportunities to learn Address specific identified practices Well structured Authentic settings Support (scaffolding, models) Feedback (coaching, reflection) Expertise in professions is gained through well-structured opportunities to practice particular skills in authentic settings with support and feedback. LOOKS much like high quality PD. Also looks a lot like what effective SPE teachers do.

Expertise Cannot develop expertise unless essential practices are identified One of the major barriers to improving the practice of special educators and other teachers is that we have not identified the most important practices they should learn to use.

Expertise Step 1—Identify essential practices Step 2—Systematically train candidates to use these practices

Structure and Content of Teacher Preparation

Issues with Current Structure (NCATE, 2010) Most preparation occurs in settings remote from practice Loose connections between coursework and field experiences

Issues--Current Structure Fragmentation between theory and practice Focus mostly on conceptual underpinnings of practice Candidates know about practices, but we do not prepare them to use practices

Current Structure How do candidates learn to use practices? Learn from field experiences/internship Cooperating teacher has skill in using certain practices No systematic control over what practices are learned Practices learned are largely left to chance

Issues--Current Structure Most teacher preparation programs are not structured to prepare candidates to use practices (NCATE, 2010) Recommended that teacher preparation should be ‘turned upside down’ and centered in clinical practice

Discussion--Current Content Take five minutes to discuss Do teacher preparation programs have too much content to cover? If so, where does the content come from? Why does it have to be covered? Does most of this content improve teacher practice? Does so much content make teacher preparation a mile wide and an inch deep?

Current Content One of the major barriers to improving the practice of teachers is that we have not identified the most important practices they should learn to use to improve student outcomes.

Current Content The HLPs were developed to Identify essential practices Provide more focus for teacher preparation Core curriculum of practice for teacher preparation

HLP Writing Team James McLeskey, Chair, University of Florida Mary-Dean Barringer, Council of the Chief State School Officers and First CEC Teacher of the Year Bonnie Billingsley, Virginia Tech Mary Brownell, University of Florida Dia Jackson, American Institutes for Research Tim Lewis, University of Missouri Michael Kennedy, University of Virginia Larry Maheady, SUNY-Buffalo State Jackie Rodriguez, College of William and Mary Mary Catherine Scheeler, Pennsylvania State University Judy Winn, University of WI – Milwaukee Deb Ziegler, CEC

Criteria to identify HLPs Effective in improving student outcomes Used frequently by teachers Broadly applicable across content areas (e.g., reading, math) Fundamental to effective teaching

Criteria to identify HLPs Novices can learn to use in practice Can be taught during teacher preparation Limited in number

High Leverage Practices (HLPs) “A set of practices that are fundamental to support…student learning, and that can be taught, learned, and implemented by those entering the profession.” (Windschitl, Thompson, Braaten, & Stroupe, 2012, p. 880)

What are HLPs for SPE Teachers? Collaboration Assessment Social Behavior Instruction First identified critical areas of practice for improving student outcomes for special education teachers. Collaboration—work with others to improve student achievement. Assessment—monitor student progress—data based decision maker. Social Behavior--manage and support student behavior across tiers Instruction—provide instruction across tiers

What are HLPs for SPE Teachers? Collaboration (3) Assessment (3) Social Behavior (4) Instruction (12) Then identified essential practices related to each. Initially almost 40 practices. Through focus group interviews, presentations at conferences, online feedback, presentation to the CEC Representative Assembly for feedback, ended up with 22. HLP writing team all agreed on some of these practices, a majority supported all of them.

What are HLPs for SPE Teachers? Collaboration Collaborate with professionals Run meetings Collaborate with parents

What are HLPs for SPE Teachers? Assessment Formative assessment (HLP6) Collaborate regarding assessment data Comprehensive learner profile

What are HLPS for SPE Teachers? Social Behavior Consistent, organized, respectful learning environment Feedback Teach Social Behaviors FBA/BIP

What are HLPs for SPE Teachers? Instruction Identify Learning goals Design instruction toward goals Adapt curriculum/tasks for specific learning goals Teach strategies to support learning Scaffold instruction Use explicit instruction

What are HLPs for SPE Teachers? Instruction Flexible grouping Strategies to support engagement Assistive and Instructional technology Intensive instruction (small groups) Support generalization Positive and constructive feedback

Discussion For the most part are these HLPs relevant for ALL teachers who teach students with disabilities and other students who struggle? Which are especially relevant?

How are HLPs Integrated into Teacher Preparation

Transition in Curriculum Development and Practice in Teacher Preparation emphasis on a broad and not very deep curriculum for teacher preparation that focuses on what teachers need to know ABOUT effective practices emphasis on ensuring that candidates can USE essential practices in classroom settings

Practice-based Teacher Education Turn teacher preparation upside down Wrap relevant coursework around clinical practice candidates would engage in more practice-based teaching opportunities learn to use a set of essential practices (HLPs) receive feedback and support Turning teacher prep upside down. Integrating coursework into practice.

Pedagogical Challenges To develop fluency, novices need multiple opportunities to use HLPs and receive feedback and support opportunities can occur across variety of settings, from university to P-12 classrooms

Pedagogical Challenges Infrastructure to support novices, teachers, and program Identify ways to teach practices Provide on campus and school-based support for implementation Continuum of practice based opportunities

A Continuum of Options for Developing Practice Any of these methods may improve practice High Impact High Effort Low Impact Low Effort Assign readings, discussion, application papers In class simulations, role-plays, & micro-teaching Early clinical experience with integrated coursework Internship Clinical year & coaching

Organizational Challenges Teacher educators and their partners must agree on a set of core practices around which to organize learning of candidates Implementation may require creating, reorganizing, or adapting structural arrangements on campus & in practice sites

Where to Begin? “The important thing is not where you begin or what practices are used. The important thing is to begin preparing candidates to USE practices in classrooms”

Where to Begin? Entire program redesign Select a cluster of HLPs to address

Where to Begin—Entire Program? Funding often needed Strong support from Dean and Department Chairs Strong support from an influential, core group of faculty Strong relationship with partner schools

Where to Begin—Cluster of HLPs? Instruction (perhaps in content area) Behavior Select critical HLPs that are complex, and thus complemented/supported by other HLPs Tiers (RtI/MTSS)

Where to Begin—Cluster of HLPs? Complex HLPs Collaborate with other professionals (HLP 1) Formative assessment (HLP 6) Establish learning environment (HLP 7) Flexible grouping (HLP 17) Intensive, small group instruction (HLP 21)

RTI/MTSS 325T Grant to University of Florida Restructuring and Improving Teacher Education (Project RITE)

RTI/MTSS Summer—Tier 3 reading Summer reading program Field experiences and coursework fully integrated Focus--assess, identify, and solve complex reading problems

RTI/MTSS Full year internship On-line coursework integrated with field experiences On-site and distant supervision Fall Semester-–Tier 2/3 instruction Formative assessment—progress monitoring Data-based decision making Behavior/Classroom management

RTI/MTSS Spring Semester-–Tier 1/2 instruction Explicit strategies for teaching writing Explicit strategies for teaching math Collaborating with professionals to support student learning in inclusive classrooms

Questions? Comments?