Philadelphia Infant Toddler Early Intervention

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 30 Early Intervention Overview Rationale for early intervention services Principles of early intervention Services and supports available for early.
Advertisements

Provider Onboarding Series 1 By: Brenda Amos-Moss and Donna DeSanto
Team Meetings in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 4 By: Brenda Amos-Moss and Donna DeSanto.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Family Centered Approach Hussain Ali Maseeh, Psy.D. Director of SEDIC.
NEW YORK CITY EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAM FAMILIES AS PARTNERS.
Providing Primary Provider Early Intervention Services Shining Stars Creating Connections July 2012.
EARLY INTERVENTION, NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS, PART C, IFSP ECSE 672 Seminar #1 September 2, 2014.
DALE ELLENBERG MS, OTR/L OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST Using A Coaching Model for Sensory Processing Strategies With Learning Coaches And Their School Aged Students.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
Kacie Wittke LEND Fellow April 30, “Interdisciplinary practice involves the interaction and collaboration of professionals from more than one discipline.
An Introduction to The SCERTS ® Model Collaborators- Barry Prizant, Ph.D. Amy Wetherby, Ph.D. Emily Rubin, MS Amy Laurent, Ed.M, OTR/L Copyright 2010-
Service Delivery and Teaming Presented by
Module 1 - Rationale for Consultation in Itinerant ECSE Service Delivery Project DIRECT 2007 Defining Itinerant Roles for Early Childhood Teachers Project.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
SPED 537: ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities/ Sensory Impairments Class 2, February 6-7, 2006 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge.
Teaming and Team Meetings. Objectives To understand the characteristics of team based early intervention To understand who is on the early intervention.
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Special Education in Context: People, Concepts, and Perspectives
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATIVE CONSULTATION MODEL(CCM) SY Early Learning Programs Birth through Five.
‘PARENT’S IN PARTNERSHIP’ Carol Cuffe Disability Manager Kildare West Wicklow.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Goals of Transition Plans  To ensure continuity of services  To minimize disruptions to the family system by facilitating adaptation to change  To ensure.
Integrated Specialized Services 2005 Inclusion Institute Chapel Hill, NC Peggy Freund, Ph.D. National Individualizing Preschool Inclusion Project Center.
Children Learn through Incredible Amounts of Practice! The amount of a toddler’s experience with walking is the only predictor of improved proficiency.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Assessment -
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Clinton County RESA Early On ® Training & Technical Assistance Higher Education Introduction to: Developing Functional IFSP Outcomes to Meet the Unique.
EI/ECSE 101: Understanding the Basics of Early Intervention Under IDEA Part C Kathleen Mankinen, M. Ed. FSDB Outreach Department Parent Infant Program.
1 Setting the Stage Carl Dunst, Robin McWilliam,Mary Beth Bruder, Julianne Woods, Pip Campbell, Dathan Rush, M’lissa Sheldon, Jack Neisworth, Stephen Bagnato,
OSEP Project Director’s Conference State Deaf Blind Projects Meeting July 24, 2008.
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
F irst C onnections home and community-based early intervention for families of infants and toddlers birth to the third birthday DDS-Children’s Services.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
Coaching in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 3
Infants & Toddlers with HL Chapter 14
Team Meetings in Early Intervention
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Provider Onboarding Series 1 By: Brenda Amos-Moss and Donna DeSanto
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Transdisciplinary Team Approach
Cross-Discipline Team Practices in Early Intervention and Schools: An Exploratory Study in Connecticut Chelsea Pansé, M.A., Special Education and Hannah.
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Family-Guided Routines-Based Intervention Introduction Module
Making Connections: Vermont’s Early Intervention Partnerships
Linking Standards, IFSPs and Service Delivery
Nevada County INFANT PROGRAM
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
DB Summit 2016 Early Identification/Referral Session
Danna Conn, Tennessee Deaf-Blind Project
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Transdisciplinary Team Approach
Using Data for Program Improvement
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Early Childhood Special Education
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Using Data for Program Improvement
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Presentation transcript:

Philadelphia Infant Toddler Early Intervention The Transdisciplinary Team Approach

Our Plan and Purpose Support for transdisciplinary team approach in legislation, research and recommended practice Describe the prevalence of the transdisciplinary team approach Define the transdisciplinary team approach in Philadelphia

Support for the Transdisciplinary Team Approach

IDEA 2004 Congress finds that there is an urgent and substantial need— to enhance the development of infants and toddlers with disabilities, to minimize their potential for developmental delay, and to recognize the significant brain development that occurs during a child's first 3 years of life to enhance the capacity of families to meet the special needs of their infants and toddlers with disabilities

(Dunst, Brookfield & Epstein, 1998) Supporting Research “The delivery of [decontextualized skill-based therapy and educational services] in a child’s home increased reports of negative well-being.” “The more [decontextualized, skill-based] services the child and family received, the less satisfied the respondents were with early intervention.” (Dunst, Brookfield & Epstein, 1998)

Supporting Research Preliminary survey data of a parent report of the helpfulness of early intervention providers indicate that 96% of the parents having one provider rated him/her as helpful, 77% of the parents having two providers rated them as helpful, and 69% of parents having three or more providers rated them as helpful (p<.001). (Dunst & Bruder, 2004)

In Practice Therapy Associations: AOTA: http://www.aota.org/-/media/Corporate/Files/Practice/Children/AOTA-Advisory-on-Primary-Provider-in-EI.pdf APTA: http://www.pediatricapta.org/consumer-patient-information/pdfs/Service%20Delivery.pdf ASHA: http://www.asha.org/policy/gl2008-00293.htm

A Recommended Practice DEC: Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices Key Principle: “The families priorities, needs and interests are addressed most appropriately by a primary provider who represents and receives team and community support” Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments (November, 2007) Mission and principles for providing services in natural environments. OSEP TA Community of Practice-Part C Settings. http://www.nectac.org/topics/families/families.asp

Definition of Transdisciplinary Approach The exchange of information and strategies across disciplines.

How prevalent is this approach?

22 Primary Provider Approach 3 Transdisciplinary Team States Identified as Endorsing or Using a State Approach to Early Intervention Service Delivery 22 Primary Provider Approach 3 Transdisciplinary Team Consultative Model 5 Developing a Primary Service Provider Model 19 No named model (Pletcher, 2009)

Why the Transdisciplinary Team Approach? We need a method that emphasizes how children really learn We need a plan that’s unified around the family’s functional needs We need to capitalize on families’ forming close relationships with a primary service provider We need to use our limited resources most effectively (McWilliams, 2004)

Early Intervention Team Approaches Multidisciplinary Interdisciplinary Transdisciplinary separate assessment integration of findings and recommendations typically is left to the family plan is carried out by professionals independently separate or collaborative assessment formal channels of communication to share findings and discuss individual results plan is carried out by professionals independently with collaboration of family may include collaborative assessment professionals teach others activities or intervention strategies that do not require the expertise of the therapist plan is carried out by family and one team member designated as primary service provider

The Transdisciplinary Team Approach in Philadelphia

Key Elements of Philadelphia’s Transdisciplinary Team Approach The family is central to the Early Intervention team. A primary service provider (PSP) is identified for each child with an IFSP by determining what type of professional can best help the child and family/caregivers achieve the IFSP outcomes. The PSP supports and coaches the family to learn strategies and use adaptations and resources that promote their child’s learning and development.

Key Elements of Philadelphia’s Transdisciplinary Team Approach The other professional service providers on the transdisciplinary team function as consultants to the family and PSP, and may suggest additional strategies, interventions, adaptations and resources to address the IFSP outcomes. When an agency picks up a child for PSP, they are agreeing to also provide the accompanying consultation if it is requested at a later point in the delivery of IFSP services.

Team Member Roles Role of the Family/Caregiver Work directly with the child as PSP observes and coaches parent/caregiver to use strategies and adaptations to address the IFSP outcomes. Work with the PSP to help the child learn and participate in the family’s activities. After each visit by the PSP, try the suggestions written in the Session Note. Update the PSP on successes and challenges with suggested strategies, adaptations and resources. Be present with the PSP and the consultant when consultation is given and actively participate in the consultation. Use the suggested strategies, adaptations and resources from the consults to promote the child’s participation in the family’s typical activities and routines.

Team Member Roles Role of the Primary Service Provider (PSP) Start services and visit the family with the greatest frequency. Help the family to use strategies, adaptations and resources to achieve the child’s IFSP outcomes. Review interventions and progress data with their supervisor when: a child is not making progress PSP needs guidance about the use of additional strategies, adaptations and resources.

Team Member Roles Role of the Primary Service Provider (PSP) Coordinate with the parent and other team members to assess the need and scheduling of consultations. Be present and participate along with the family at the consult. Be coached and trained by the consultant. Prepare the service support plan to reflect the strategies and adaptations recommended by the consultant. Collect and share the visual representation of progress at the quarterly review meeting and at consultations.

Consultation

Team Member Roles Role of the Service Coordinator At the initial IFSP, explain the trandisciplinary team approach to families and answer questions that they may have. Facilitate quarterly reviews and annual IFSP meetings with the caregiver and PSP and consultants (when assigned) to review the progress on outcomes and any additional concerns.

Team Member Roles Role of the Service Coordinator When the team makes a request for consultation or a change in PSP as part of the quarterly review or annual IFSP meeting, the SC will make the needed referrals. When the team requests a team meeting outside of the quarterly or annual review process to discuss a change in the PSP or adding or increasing consultation, the SC will receive a completed Request for Team Meeting form from the PSP that has been approved by the PSP’s supervisor.

Choosing the Primary Service Provider To select the PSP, the team asks: Who is the best person to help the child and family achieve the outcome based on the family’s priority needs?

Choosing the Primary Service Provider During the IFSP meeting, and whenever new outcomes are being formed (e.g., quarterly review), the team discusses priority needs of the family and desired outcomes for the child. As a team, the family and the professionals choose an Early Interventionist who will be the primary service provider (PSP).

Choosing the Primary Service Provider Although nearly 75% of children in Philadelphia Infant Toddler Early Intervention receive a Special Instructor on their service delivery team, the team may determine that another service profession (e.g., Occupational Therapy) should be the child’s PSP.

Choosing the Primary Service Provider The team can use the guidelines developed for speech, physical therapy, occupational therapy, teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing, and vision teachers to help them determine the PSP and any needed consultation.

References American Speech-Language, Hearing Association. (2008). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in early intervention: Guidelines [Technical Report]. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved from: http://www.asha.org/policy/gl2008-00293.htm Buysee, V. & Wesley, P.W. (2005). Consultation in early childhood settings. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing. Dunst, C.J., Brookfield, J. & Epstein, J. (1998, December). Family centered early intervention and child, parents and family benefits: Final Report. Ashville, NC: Orlena Hawks Puckett Institute. Dunst, C.J. & Bruder, M.B. (2004). Findings from National Survey of Service Coordination in Early Intervention. Research and Training Center on Service Coordination. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, Part C (2004).

References McWilliam, R. A. (2004). Enhancing services in natural environments. A web enhanced conference call series, sponsored by OSEP Part C Settings Community of Practice. PowerPoint presentation retrieved from: http://www.ectacenter.org/~pdfs/calls/2004/partcsettings/mcwilliam.pdf Pilkington, K.O. (2006). Side by side: Transdisciplinary early intervention in natural environments. Retrieved from: https://www.cdd.unm.edu/ecspd/portal/docs/tta/AOTA%20Side%20by%20Side_Transdisciplinary%20EI.pdf Pletcher, L.. (March 2009). Survey of Part C Coordinators. Personal communication. Sandall, S., Hemmeter, M.L., Smith, B.J., & McLean, M.E. (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education. Longmont, CA: Sopris West. Vanderhoff, M. (2004). Maximizing your role in early intervention. Retrieved from: http://www.cdd.unm.edu/ecln/FIT/pdfs/APTA%20%20Maximizing%20Your%20Role%20in%20EI.pdf Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments. (November 2007). Mission and principles for providing services in natural environments. OSEP TA Community of Practice-Part C settings. Retrieved from: http://ectacenter.org/~pdfs/eco/Finalmissionandprinciples3_11_08.pdf